[Bug lto/95846] New: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following program demonstrates this problem: ==< test

[Bug lto/95846] Combination of LTO and -Wl, --defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95846 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reported to binutils bugzilla: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163

[Bug target/61551] [NEON] alter costs to allow use of post-indexed addressing modes for VLD{2..4}/VST{2..4}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 --- Comment #3 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Tue Feb 9 18:47:55 2016 New Revision: 233251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233251&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR68532: Fix up vuzp for big endian gcc/C

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 --- Comment #4 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Tue Feb 9 18:49:05 2016 New Revision: 233252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233252&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR68532 Fix up vzip recognition for big end

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/69770] New: [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When compiling with -mlong-calls and -pg, calls to the __gnu_mcount_nc function are not generated as long calls. extern

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm*-*-* Status

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00881.html

[Bug target/68802] seg fault when non-main thread calls std::current_exception ARMv7-A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68802 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/60609] [4.8 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #9 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Thu May 8 17:06:04 2014 New Revision: 210227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210227&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-08 Charles Baylis Backport from

[Bug target/60609] [4.8 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Thu May 8 17:06:01 2014 New Revision: 210226 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210226&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-08 Charles Baylis Backport from

[Bug target/60609] [4.8 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Thu May 8 17:06:01 2014 New Revision: 210226 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210226&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-08 Charles Baylis Backport from

[Bug target/60609] [4.8 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/61411] New: [NEON] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Target: aarch64-oe-linux Created attachment 32890 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32890&action=edit Reduced test ca

[Bug target/61551] New: [NEON] alter costs to allow use of post-indexed addressing modes for VLD{2..4}/VST{2..4}

Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi Created attachment 32967

[Bug ipa/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 --- Comment #5 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Committed to trunk http://gcc.gnu.org/r227407 and gcc/ChangeLog corrected in http://gcc.gnu.org/r227534

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #11 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Wed Nov 11 01:05:16 2015 New Revision: 230142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230142&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR63870 Add qualifiers for NEON builtins 20

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #12 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Wed Nov 11 01:08:43 2015 New Revision: 230143 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230143&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR63870 Mark lane indices of vldN/v

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #13 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Wed Nov 11 01:11:20 2015 New Revision: 230144 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230144&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR63870 Remove error for invalid lane numbe

[Bug ipa/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 --- Comment #7 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am backporting the fix to GCC 5 now. I'll close it once committed.

[Bug ipa/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 --- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Mon Nov 16 15:01:01 2015 New Revision: 230427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230427&root=gcc&view=rev Log: backport of fix for PR67280 (r227407) 2015-11-16

[Bug ipa/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #6 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is still a lot to do. I have patches in progress for Aarch64 loads and stores. Aarch64 shifts still need doing, and everything for ARM.

[Bug rtl-optimization/44404] auto-inc-dec generates an invalid assembly instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44404 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gilles.chanteperdrix@xenoma

[Bug middle-end/38674] When storing in a register the address of a value contained in the same register, gcc 4.3.2 on ARM clobbers the register before saving its content on the stack.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38674 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/65304] New: [4.9] [ARM] incorrect "asm operand has impossible constraints" error

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf Created attachment 34940 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3494

[Bug rtl-optimization/65304] [4.9] [ARM] incorrect "asm operand has impossible constraints" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65304 --- Comment #1 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34941 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34941&action=edit automatically reduced test case

[Bug target/63870] New: [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON instrinsics are reported incorrectly

: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org CC: alan.lawrence at arm dot com Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi, aarch64-linux-gnu Created attachment 33972 --> ht

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Thu Nov 20 16:26:54 2014 New Revision: 217885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217885&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/63870 * config/aarch64

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/49423] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #29 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Sat Jul 5 11:58:06 2014 New Revision: 212303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212303&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/49423 2014-07-05 Charle

[Bug target/49423] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

[Bug target/61948] New: [ARM] [4.9 regression] ICE with DImode shift by 1 bit (in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1)

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf Created attachment 33202 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33202&

[Bug target/61948] [ARM] [4.9 regression] ICE with DImode shift by 1 bit (in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/61948] [ARM] [4.10 regression] ICE with DImode shift by 1 bit (in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Thu Jul 31 14:27:58 2014 New Revision: 213376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213376&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61948 gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-07-29 Charle

[Bug target/61948] [ARM] [4.10 regression] ICE with DImode shift by 1 bit (in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 --- Comment #6 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- git bisect points to r211625 as the revision which fixes/hides this bug on trunk. 2014-06-13 Richard Biener * tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children

[Bug target/63277] ARM - NEON excessive use of vmov for vtbl2 / uint8x8x2 for shuffling data unnecessarily around

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63277 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/49423] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #33 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Mon Sep 29 16:47:31 2014 New Revision: 215685 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215685&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-29 Charles Baylis Backp

[Bug target/49423] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #34 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Mon Sep 29 17:07:47 2014 New Revision: 215686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215686&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-29 Charles Baylis Backp

[Bug target/49423] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #14 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Mon Nov 30 17:11:16 2015 New Revision: 231077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231077&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2015-11-30 Charle

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/68532] [ARM] Incorrect code result on arm big endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68532 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01644.html

[Bug target/68802] seg fault when non-main thread calls std::current_exception ARMv7-A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68802 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #42 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- While we're suggesting fixes to the kernel, wouldn't it be better if CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 forced the kernel to be built with the linker workarounds if the kernel is

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #8 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted to the mailing list https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00799.html

[Bug target/63870] [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON intrinsics are reported incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870 --- Comment #9 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cbaylis Date: Wed Jul 22 10:44:16 2015 New Revision: 226059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-07-22 Charles Baylis

[Bug target/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Minimum optimisations to reproduce this are -O1 -fipa-icf-functions -fipa-sra. These options also allow the bug to be reproduced on trunk (with -O2 the bug is latent, I haven't investigate

[Bug target/67280] [5 Regression] wrong C++11 code generated on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280 --- Comment #3 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01791.html