http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42857
Andrew Ayer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs at mm dot beanwood.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56692
Bug #: 56692
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [C++11] Segmentation fault when
calling static/non-static overloaded function from
lambda
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at mm dot beanwood.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41332
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41332&action=e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42857
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Ayer ---
Any word on if this will be fixed in GCC? To summarize, GCC's current behavior
is wrong because:
* Underflowing after ignoring the requested number of bytes could block
forever, breaking applications.
* The