http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359
Bug #: 54359
Summary: [C++0x][N3282] decltype in member function's trailing
return type when defined outside of class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
Bug #: 55032
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: in
strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52739
Bug #: 52739
Summary: [c++0x] Segfault because of nested lambda member
capture inside member template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51847
Bug #: 51847
Summary: incorrect primitive array initialization in generic
methods
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bruno-gcc at defraine dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47005
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47005&action=edit
Test case
Consider the example in attachment, where we use a toy al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92023
--- Comment #2 from Bruno De Fraine ---
Thanks Richard, for explaining that gcc is optimizing the comparison between
the address of a static object and a pointer to dynamic memory returned by
operator new[]. I realized something was special about
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bruno-gcc at defraine dot net
Target Milestone: ---
GCC raises an error when the argument of an (unknown) C++ attribute contains an
undeclared identifier. Tested with -std=c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221
Bruno De Fraine changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno-gcc at defraine dot net
