--- Comment #1 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-05 19:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=13659)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13659&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31743
--- Comment #2 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-05 20:09 ---
The macro invocation "TYPE_MODE (type)" causes the ICE when tree checking is
enabled because TREE_CODE_CLASS (type) is ERROR_MARK. Checking for this before
checking the tree and returning NULL_TREE allows the c
--- Comment #3 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-05 20:11 ---
Typo (sorry!)
"4.2 and 4.3" above should be "4.1 and 4.2"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31743
--- Comment #6 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-07 15:48 ---
As Andrew Pinski has noted, 4.2.0 rejects the code with a proper error message.
The latest trunk does the same. The change which fixes this is
2006-08-20 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++
--- Comment #7 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-07 15:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=13665)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13665&action=view)
Proposed Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29704
--- Comment #5 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-08 15:41 ---
OK, I've looked into this a bit more. For inspiration I looked into where the
error is generated when an incomplete struct is used instead of an unsized
array. I found it in:
cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic call
--- Comment #7 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-08 15:46 ---
Small optimization. We need only call complete_type_or_else once we know it's
an array type.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31743
--- Comment #6 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-08 15:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=13667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13667&action=view)
New proposed patch
--
brolley at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-06-08 15:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13668)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13668&action=view)
Improvement on previous patch
--
brolley at redhat dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #1 from brolley at redhat dot com 2007-07-05 20:05 ---
I've worked on this a bit and just realized that it's assigned to Mark
Mitchell. However, here's what I've learned, in case it helps...
The segfault occurs in convert_for_initialization because the
10 matches
Mail list logo
