[Bug tree-optimization/47004] New: missed optimization in comparison

2010-12-18 Thread bosch at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47004 Summary: missed optimization in comparison Product: gcc Version: 4.5.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unass

[Bug tree-optimization/47004] missed optimization in comparison

2010-12-18 Thread bosch at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47004 Geert Bosch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bosch at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/47411] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86-64/Darwin

2011-01-22 Thread bosch at gcc dot gnu.org
||2011.01.22 12:08:12 CC||bosch at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Geert Bosch 2011-01-22 12:08:12 UTC --- I've confirmed that reverting Richard's patch to tree-ssa-ccp.c restores

[Bug ada/51483] [4.7 regression] cstand.adb:Register_Float_Type makes invalid assumptions about FP representation

2012-01-09 Thread bosch at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483 --- Comment #5 from Geert Bosch 2012-01-10 02:55:46 UTC --- If I understand correctly, you're changing the interface to pass the object size (Esize) instead of the precision (RM_Size). That is not correct. Right now, we have the assumption that