[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #21 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 36142 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36142&action=edit Configure gold with split stack based on binutils version This is an updated version of the p

[Bug go/67198] [5/6 Regression] change of type of syscall.RawSockaddr.Data on ppc64 breaks compilation of existing programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67198 --- Comment #2 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- I was asked to make this fix to gccgo. A corresponding Docker fix is needed which is described here https://github.com/docker/libcontainer/pull/625. It is unfortunate it introduces an

[Bug go/67198] [5/6 Regression] change of type of syscall.RawSockaddr.Data on ppc64 breaks compilation of existing programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67198 --- Comment #4 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- I'll admit I'm not familiar with how this field could ever be used. But you are saying that no code will ever try to do a compare with this field when has a value greater than 127? If i

[Bug go/67198] [5/6 Regression] change of type of syscall.RawSockaddr.Data on ppc64 breaks compilation of existing programs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67198 --- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- I am working with our Docker team to provide a source change that will compile with old and new gccgo.

<    1   2