[Bug middle-end/51442] New: volatile bitfields broken on arm

2011-12-06 Thread bconoboy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442 Bug #: 51442 Summary: volatile bitfields broken on arm Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/51442] volatile bitfields broken on arm

2011-12-06 Thread bconoboy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442 --- Comment #1 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-06 21:02:22 UTC --- This bug is in reference to the patch that Diego Novillo accepted into 4.7 about 10 months ago: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01477.html The issue is still present i

[Bug middle-end/51442] volatile bitfields broken on arm

2011-12-06 Thread bconoboy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442 --- Comment #2 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-06 21:12:46 UTC --- Created attachment 26010 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26010 Only use BLKmode for volatile accesses which are not naturally aligned. Per Julian Brown's origina

[Bug middle-end/51442] volatile bitfields broken on arm

2011-12-09 Thread bconoboy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51442 --- Comment #4 from Brendan Conoboy 2011-12-10 01:49:25 UTC --- FYI, I've checked out svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_6-branch revision 182172, run and rerun the complete testsuite before and after this patch (As well as the patch Richar