[Bug c++/44380] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44380

[Bug c++/44381] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44381

[Bug c++/44383] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44383

[Bug c++/44387] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44387

[Bug c++/44388] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44388

[Bug c++/44389] New: [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
tedBy: avenikov at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 GCC target triplet: x86-64, Linux 2.6.18 (Suse 11.0), gcc 4.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44389

[Bug c++/44380] [C++0x]: result_of broken for functor references.

2010-06-02 Thread avenikov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from avenikov at gmail dot com 2010-06-02 15:36 --- Sorry, I've just noticed that I messed up. I was clicking the "refresh" button to see the status of the bug and apparently that was creating new bug report every time. Sorry for that. -- http://gcc.g