http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55024
Bug #: 55024
Summary: cse_process_notes_1/equiv_constant: missing mode check
for hardware registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55025
Bug #: 55025
Summary: reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine/get_last_value: missing
mode check for hardware registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53303
Bug #: 53303
Summary: Reload/RA issue on paradoxical subreg of subword
regsiter for big endian targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53303
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-05-24 07:43:39 UTC ---
This bug is very annoying for me. I can't really work around it.
Let me know if there is something I can do to help fixing it...
Cheers,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53303
Aurelien Buhrig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Reload/RA issue on |Reload/RA issue on word
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #9 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-03-20 16:22:52 UTC ---
Do you need additional information about this bug?
Any comment about the provided patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831
Bug #: 52831
Summary: extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from
target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-04-02 09:42:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 27062
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27062
Fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831
Aurelien Buhrig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.6.3
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Buhr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Bug #: 51893
Summary: Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1
on BIG_ENDIAN targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Aurelien Buhrig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-01-20 09:00:38 UTC ---
After modifying this patch for 4.6.1 this patch doesn't work (bitfld-3.c
testcase).
It doesn't affect the value subword offset computation (wordnum) when calling
operand_subword_for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #6 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-01-20 10:32:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > After modifying this patch for 4.6.1 this patch doesn't work (bitfld-3.c
> > testcase).
>
> What do you mean exactly? That gnat.dg/bitfld-3.c fails wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #8 from Aurelien Buhrig
2012-01-23 08:27:22 UTC ---
It seems the problem occurs with big endian targets when value is at least 4
times bigger than a word.
Example:
bitsize=40, value = reg:DI sub words-->HI. So wordnum = 3.
The for lo
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: aurelien.buhrig.gcc at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40619
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40619&action=edit
patch
In simpl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79279
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Buhrig ---
Patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02265.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79279
Aurelien Buhrig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
17 matches
Mail list logo
