[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

2013-03-26 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #9 from Ami Tavory 2013-03-26 21:40:03 UTC --- Great, many thanks!

[Bug c++/24054] New: std::tr1::unordered_map's erase does not seem to return a value

2005-09-25 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: atavory at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24054

[Bug c++/24061] New: Documentation in /tr1/hashtable proposes possibly misleading change

2005-09-25 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
ignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: atavory at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24061

[Bug libstdc++/24064] New: tr1::unordered_map seems to seg-fault when caching hash values

2005-09-26 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
nordered_map seems to seg-fault when caching hash values Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug libstdc++/24061] Documentation in /tr1/hashtable proposes possibly misleading change

2005-09-26 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From atavory at gmail dot com 2005-09-26 22:22 --- (In reply to comments #2 and #3: Actually, on second thought, I'm not sure we should give up consistency so easily only because the it = t.erase(it) idiom cannot be meaningfully used together with unor

[Bug libstdc++/56170] New: Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

2013-01-31 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 Bug #: 56170 Summary: Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

2013-02-01 Thread atavory at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #6 from Ami Tavory 2013-02-02 07:24:16 UTC --- Hi Paolo (again) and Jonathan, Thanks for offering to add the missing functionality, Jonathan. I was wondering if there might be an interest to add _AllocatorConcept to