https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80488
Andreas Reischuck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arbmind at gmail dot com
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: arbmind at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Please take a look at my constexpr experiment.
http://goo.gl/T7h3Qg
GCC 5.2.0 and 5.1.0 has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68074
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Reischuck ---
Fixed some issues in my example.
http://goo.gl/Rxq7TP
The ranged for loops now compile on clang. The problem is not the loop, but the
address calculation.
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: arbmind at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 61619
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61619&action=edit
Code to reproduce
GCC seems to generate wrong types for non-
