--- Comment #18 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-12-10 13:46 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4
are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 13
--- Comment #14 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-12-10 12:46 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj_bc for 4.3 and 4.4
are binary incompatible but have the same SONAME
rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
>> Look at the exported symbols in the old version of libgcj_bc.so.
>
--- Comment #18 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-03 15:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
> --- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11
--- Comment #24 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 16:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> You shouldn't call that function. Instead, you should set
> DECL_STATIC_{
--- Comment #27 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 18:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dje dot gcc at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #25 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 18
--- Comment #31 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 23:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
> --- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11
--- Comment #36 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-05 14:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote:
> After rebuilding jc1 and rerunning the libjava testsuite on
> alp
--- Comment #15 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-02-09 16:46 ---
Subject: Re: Undocumented java programs
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-09 16:20
> ---
> Would the Java maintainers accept a patch
--- Comment #27 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-04 21:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ecj1 linked against both
-lgcj and -lgcj_bc
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how can a pr like this one be "UNCONFIRMED"?
Insanity is the only expl
--- Comment #5 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-20 08:48 ---
Subject: Re: [arm] libjava build failure due to missing
thread synchronization primitives
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 05:58
> ---
--- Comment #7 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-20 15:44 ---
Subject: Re: [arm] libjava build failure due to missing
thread synchronization primitives
>> I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do.
>>
>> What did you change to support arm-ea
--- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2009-04-22 17:33 ---
Subject: Re: 16 symbolic register names generates error:
more than 30 operands in 'asm'
> 0) I will build gcc-4.4 and try that. I will also make the 1 line patch to it
> to try increasing the number of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from
--- Comment #37 from aph at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 17:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava
testsuite on arm-linux
On 04/13/2010 05:52 PM, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote:
>> Is it maybe the case that "Compact model 1" unwinder data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-30 08:58 ---
Ah, thanks. It was a causalty of a hard disk crash I had.
I'll do it once 4.0 is thawed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21428
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22460
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-08-08 17:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh:
Argument list too long"
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
>
> Andrew, is a backport fine with you?
Yes. Go
--- Comment #3 from aph at redhat dot com 2010-01-23 23:18 ---
Subject: Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be
overloaded
On 01/22/2010 11:43 AM, mathieu dot malaterre at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from mathieu dot malaterre at gmail dot com 201
--- Comment #8 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 13:38 ---
Subject: Re: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
Rainer Emrich writes:
> The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
> LIBICONV
> which is
> LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/L
--- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 15:41 ---
Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
Rainer Emrich writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew Haley schrieb:
> > Rainer Emrich writes:
> &
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 10:44 ---
OK, I'm looking at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:09 ---
Failure during bootstrap:
./xgcc -B./ -B/home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem
/home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/home/aph/gcc4/install/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/home
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 11:34 ---
I think you want mark_stmt_necessary (stmt, true)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2005-06-06 13:15 ---
With that change, passes bootstrap with c/c++/java, perfect i686-pc-linux-gnu
libgcj test result.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21847
--- Additional Comments From aph at redhat dot com 2004-10-11 09:11 ---
Subject: can't build GNU Classpath
I think I'm going to have to give up on this bug. If I can't
duplicate the problem myself and you can't duplicate the propblem on
any machine to which I
27 matches
Mail list logo
