[Bug java/17733] class read for the second time

2004-09-30 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17733

[Bug java/17733] class read for the second time

2004-09-30 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-30 15:40 --- I can't duplicate this. I get: gcj -g -c jipsi-gcj.jar de/lohndirekt/print/attribute/ipp/printerdesc/defaults/NumberUpDefault.java:0: error: cannot find file for

[Bug java/17733] class read for the second time

2004-09-30 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-30 15:42 --- Um, hold on that class is in the jarfile. Weird. I'm investigating. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17733

[Bug libgcj/18036] Bad interaction between interpreter and Class.forName()

2004-10-18 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

2004-10-18 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-18 16:13 --- I can't duplicate this problem, nor can anyone else duplicate it on any machine to which I have access. -- What|Removed |

[Bug java/12760] Binary Compatibility: moving a method into a superinterface

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 15:58 --- Job done. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 12725 depends on bug 12760, which changed state. Bug 12760 Summary: Binary Compatibility: moving a method into a superinterface http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12760 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug libgcj/13606] need extra runtime verification of compiled code

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 15:59 --- Job done. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libgcj/13603] [meta-bug] Java security model tracking PR

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 13603 depends on bug 13606, which changed state. Bug 13606 Summary: need extra runtime verification of compiled code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13606 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug java/12725] [meta-bug] gcj does not conform to Binary Compatibility specification

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 12725 depends on bug 13606, which changed state. Bug 13606 Summary: need extra runtime verification of compiled code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13606 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug java/12759] Binary compatibility: rip out -fno-assume-compiled

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 16:02 --- This is fairly low priority because it doesn't really affect anything. However, removing no-assume-compiled could cause considerable lossage. For the time being, we could simply remove the command line o

[Bug java/12757] Binary Compatibility: overlap between constant pool and tables

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12757

[Bug libgcj/13604] AccessController unfinished

2004-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 16:16 --- Is there any special reason why this patch is unreviewed? Might it make things worse? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604

[Bug libgcj/16481] Wrong stack trace in conjunction with custom ClassLoaders

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:22 --- AFAICS it's the same bug as 18036. In any case, it now works correctly on the trunk i686-pc-linux-gnu. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18036 *** -- What|Re

[Bug libgcj/18036] Bad interaction between interpreter and Class.forName()

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:22 --- *** Bug 16481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/12457] jc1 -femit-class-files without -fsyntax-only segfaults.

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:37 --- I don't know that this is a bug at all. jc1 will do random weird things if invoked on the command line with random weird arguments. But jc1 should only be invoked in the way that the driver invokes it

[Bug java/5537] Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:40 --- We're merging the new verifier on the gcj-abi-2-dev-branch. Once that is done, this bug should be fixed. -- What|Removed |

[Bug java/13468] [4.0 Regression] interpret.cc should register ffi closure stubs

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:41 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18036 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/18036] Bad interaction between interpreter and Class.forName()

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 13:42 --- *** Bug 13468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18036

[Bug java/17574] [meta-bug] gcj and libgcj 4.0 tracking PR

2004-10-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 17574 depends on bug 13468, which changed state. Bug 13468 Summary: [4.0 Regression] interpret.cc should register ffi closure stubs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13468 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug java/17845] can't build GNU Classpath

2004-10-27 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 19:14 --- Does this mean that you've actually been able to duplicate the bug? Can you at least let me have a backtrace? Surely it's better to fix the bug than install a workaround in Classpath.

[Bug libgcj/14070] gij and -jar argument should set the manifest Class-path recursively

2004-10-29 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

2004-11-28 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 12:59 --- I can't do anything with this bug because there's no instructions for reproducing it. Please provide a step-by-step way to demonstrate the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18697

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

2004-12-02 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug java/18812] New: [4.0 Regression] ICE in catalina/common/lib/naming-resources.jar

2004-12-03 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: java AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug java/18812] [4.0 Regression] ICE in catalina/common/lib/naming-resources.jar

2004-12-03 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03 18:24 --- So? I fixed it. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/18811] [4.0 Regression] rhug build problem, regression?

2004-12-03 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03 18:28 --- Is junit.runner.Sorter$Swapper in the path? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18811

[Bug java/18868] Interface containing anonymous class breaks gij

2004-12-07 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|konqueror at gmx dot de |unassigned at gcc dot gnu ||dot org Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug java/18811] [4.0 Regression] rhug build problem, regression?

2004-12-08 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug java/18811] [4.0 Regression] rhug build problem, regression?

2004-12-08 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18811

[Bug libgcj/30076] New: Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-05 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30076

[Bug libgcj/30076] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-05 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 18:54 --- Created an attachment (id=12749) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12749&action=view) . Expected output: class pp: @A1(enumF=ACE, doubleF=99.0, stringF=A1, arrayF=[1, 2], intF=0, class

[Bug libgcj/30076] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-05 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 19:08 --- The cause of this bug is that libgcj sorts fields so that static fields come first, followed by instance fields. Any annotation indexes that refer to a field will be wrong after this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-05 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 20:12 --- Created an attachment (id=12750) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12750&action=view) . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30076

[Bug testsuite/30119] libjava testsuite output is erratic and unhelpful

2006-12-08 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 11:46 --- It's not necessary to do any I/O redirection when byte compiling: just execute the command itself without the "2>" etc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30119

[Bug testsuite/30119] libjava testsuite output is erratic and unhelpful

2006-12-08 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 15:20 --- Run it with the libjava/gij PR18699.class -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30119

[Bug testsuite/30119] libjava testsuite output is erratic and unhelpful

2006-12-08 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 16:45 --- Set the classpath gij -classpath : PR18699 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30119

[Bug testsuite/30119] libjava testsuite output is erratic and unhelpful

2006-12-13 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 13:42 --- You wrote ../gij -classpath PR18699.class:../libgcj-4.3.0.jar PR18699.class But I wrote: ../gij -classpath .:../libgcj-4.3.0.jar PR18699 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30119

[Bug testsuite/30119] libjava testsuite output is erratic and unhelpful

2006-12-15 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-15 11:21 --- OK, so it looks like this is not a testsuite problem: the problem really is with the program being tested. The next thing to do is run the program with GDB and find out where the SEGV occurs. -- aph at gcc dot gnu

[Bug java/28090] incorrect implementation of expand_java_arraystore

2006-12-21 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 15:09 --- I fixed PR19505 in July. Should not this patch go in? This is the last bug blocking 28067... -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/28754] [4.2 regression] java.lang.nullPointerException while accessing final static members of an interface

2007-01-03 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-03 14:24 --- Subject: Bug 28754 Author: aph Date: Wed Jan 3 14:23:48 2007 New Revision: 120396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120396 Log: 2007-01-03 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libgcj/30424] [4.3 regression] revision 120632 failed to build on ia64

2007-01-10 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 16:51 --- That patch is fine. -- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/26792] [4.2 Regression] need to use autoconf when using newly-added libgcc functions

2007-01-19 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-19 15:25 --- Subject: Bug 26792 Author: aph Date: Fri Jan 19 15:25:34 2007 New Revision: 120968 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120968 Log: 2006-07-21 Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

<    1   2   3   4   5