--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10503)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10503&action=view)
Patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 18:30 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00548.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25121
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 14:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25121
Author: aph
Date: Wed Dec 21 14:56:00 2005
New Revision: 108905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108905
Log:
2005-12-21 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 25121
Author: aph
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:52:13 2005
New Revision: 108914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108914
Log:
2005-12-21 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 17:27 ---
I'd like to apply this patch to 4.0, but it's too different.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
stems
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ppc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 17:16 ---
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(javax.rmi.CORBA.Stub.class);
}
}
This fails with a SEGV on PPC 64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 18:34 ---
Subject: Bug 25535
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 22 18:34:01 2005
New Revision: 108961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108961
Log:
2005-12-22 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #20 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 17:25 ---
This breaks java on s390.
# LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/s390/pr13212.so /bin/echo
/bin/echo: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgcj.so.7: undefined symbol:
__data_start
This is because pr13212.so
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 15:51 ---
Subject: Bug 25535
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:51:42 2006
New Revision: 109748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109748
Log:
2006-01-16 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #24 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 09:01 ---
Subject: Bug 19505
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jul 18 09:00:29 2006
New Revision: 115547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115547
Log:
2006-07-18 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #26 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 15:07 ---
Subject: Bug 19505
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jul 18 15:07:48 2006
New Revision: 115554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115554
Log:
2006-07-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28423
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 11:39 ---
Works for me.
$ ~/gcc/gcj-eclipse/obj-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/jc1
/tmp/LightweightRedirector.class -fhash-synchronization
-fno-use-divide-subroutine -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call-exceptions
-fkeep-inline-functions
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 09:43 ---
No, my java.lang.Class does not contain Class$0. Please attach yours.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28458
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 10:00 ---
I recompiled everything. Still:
Reading .class from
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava/libgcj-4.2.0.jar(java/lang/Class.class).
Magic number: 0xcafebabe, minor_version: 0, major_version: 49.
Access flags: 0x31 public
--- Comment #23 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 10:56 ---
QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic already uses the algorithm in Numerical Recipes.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #83 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 10:56 ---
*** Bug 16825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-07 09:54 ---
Sure, we should import the change.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug 8923
Author: aph
Date: Thu Aug 10 19:35:07 2006
New Revision: 116069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116069
Log:
2006-08-10 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 11:14 ---
This one wiil get fixed with the merge of the ecj branch.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 17:35 ---
I need a test case. Please attach the .class of .jar to this PR.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 17:37 ---
If you can generate this failure with just the class files, please supply those
instead of the whole jar.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1305
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 16:54 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 16:55 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 16:56 ---
Should be fixed on trunk.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 16:57 ---
This will be fixed with ecj.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 10:08 ---
OK, I'm working on this. It looks like a regression from 4.1.1 -> 4.1.2.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 10:37 ---
OK, here it is:
old:
14: invokevirtual
17: checkcast
20: areturn
new:
14: invokevirtual
17: areturn
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 14:05 ---
class Psupersuper
{
}
class Psuper extends Psupersuper
{
}
class P extends Psuper
{
Psupersuper barf()
{
return new P();
}
}
class PR28663
{
static Psuper arse ()
{
return (P)new P().barf
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 15:06 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg01085.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 13:58 ---
-findirect-dispatch doesn't work with Java source. Compile to.class first.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 09:01 ---
I don't understand why this bug has been reported.
Are you using an up-to-date libiberty to do the demangling? When I try c++filt
--format java, I get
Hello.main(java.lang.String[])void
which is correct.
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 08:27 ---
I don't think this bug has anything to do with excess precision. Valgrind
shows that, when compiled at -O2, we are reading from uninitialized memory.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28096
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:39 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:42 ---
I'm closing this bug. It never was reproducible: I think it was just a
one-off.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21900
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 16:59 ---
I'm guessing this is either because of more aggressive alalysis or perhaps
we're now compiling unit-at-a-time. In any case, I don't think "Java" is the
correct component.
--
ht
at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30638
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 11:37 ---
'Twas brillig, and the sithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the Wabe.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30638
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 17:10 ---
Typo'd, darn it.
Il brilgue: les to^ves lubricilleux
Se gyrent en vrilant dans le guave.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30638
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 17:44 ---
It doesn't mean anything in English, either. Kinda sorta...
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:12 ---
>From the Valgrid log I would say that this is a bug in my code.
If I can duplicate the problem in a test case, I can fix it.
If you can duplicate the problem when compiling with -findirect-dispatch then
we won
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:44 ---
Give me your jarfile.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 11:24 ---
I sent you email but I don't know if you received it.
Send the jar to aph at redhat.com
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:34 ---
Subject: Bug 30641
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 1 14:34:11 2007
New Revision: 121462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121462
Log:
2007-02-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:38 ---
Subject: Bug 30641
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 1 14:37:54 2007
New Revision: 121463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121463
Log:
2007-02-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:39 ---
Fixed.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-09 17:05 ---
I can't reproduce this with trunk or any of the Red Hat test builds.
zebedee:/tmp/Fail $ gij -cp main.jar F
class Z
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zebedee:/tmp/Fail $ gij --version
java version "1.5.0"
gij (GNU
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 11:01 ---
Definitely a 32-bit only issue:
zorro:/tmp/Fail $
~/gcc/trunk/obj-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libjava/gij
-cp main.jar F
class Z
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zorro:/tmp/Fail $
~/gcc/trunk/obj-x86_64-unknown
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 11:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=13029)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13029&action=view)
It's a patch!
This is the correct patch. The key here is that it is never correct for one
VMStackWalk
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 14:23 ---
Subject: Bug 30742
Author: aph
Date: Sat Feb 10 14:22:54 2007
New Revision: 121798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121798
Log:
2007-02-10 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 14:36 ---
Subject: Bug 30742
Author: aph
Date: Sat Feb 10 14:36:28 2007
New Revision: 121799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121799
Log:
2007-02-10 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-21 13:38 ---
I don't understand what this is supposed to be testing.
Can you please explain what your expected behaviour is?
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 15:19 ---
I can't see anything in the Java Language Standard that suggests that your test
case must terminate. Garbage collection is not deterministic, and may not
collect all objects.
When I tried your test case one objec
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-27 09:34 ---
I think we're going to have to change this to a WONTFIX for the 4.1 branch.
If we can get a 4.3 backtrace that will be interesting.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20495
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-01 11:56 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-01 11:57 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 15:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=13232)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13232&action=view)
Failing routine
A stripped-down test case that demonstrates the failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 15:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=13233)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13233&action=view)
.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31264
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 16:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=13234)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13234&action=view)
.class file
Compile this with gcc/trunk/install/bin/gcj MathLib.class -c -O2
--
aph at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 12:45 ---
Subject: Bug 31264
Author: aph
Date: Tue Mar 20 12:45:19 2007
New Revision: 123085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123085
Log:
2007-03-19 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 16:47 ---
I don't have an Alpha to test, but I can see read_barrier() in HEAD:
inline static void
read_barrier()
{
__asm__ __volatile__("mb" : : : "memory");
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 17:14 ---
I don't know what you're asking. It's fixed in HEAD, and it's fixed in Fedora
development.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30424
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-20 15:11 ---
Do you have copyright assignment?
If you do, please submit these patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-20 15:15 ---
Actually, forget that last message. Most of these patches seem to be gcc 4.2
based and the libffi and gij patches are already done.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31325
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 15:06 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jul 31 15:05:52 2007
New Revision: 127093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127093
Log:
2007-07-30 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #17 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 12:02 ---
Re comment #16: I've tested this, and it seems to work. What failures do you
expect?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31325
--- Comment #20 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 14:33 ---
Please post patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please provide a ChangeLog.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31325
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 12:48 ---
Subject: Bug 32843
Author: aph
Date: Mon Aug 6 12:48:07 2007
New Revision: 127241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127241
Log:
PR testsuite/32843
* src/x8
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 12:53 ---
> The 32bit psABI specifies Integral Arguments as 'Functions pass all
> integer-valued
> arguments as words, expanding or padding signed or unsigned bytes and
> halfwords as needed'. For return
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 13:35 ---
In addition: I suspect that this bug also is manifested on x86 Darwin, but my
patch should not affect that system at all, and therefore I suspect that this
bug is still manifested on that system.
--
http
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 08:48 ---
I've seen this in a few different contexts now.
Looks like the dataflow merge broke _Unwind_fallback_frame_state_for.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #21 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:44 ---
I've created abranch for this work at
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-eabi-branch
It's mostly done, but there are still some bugs. I'll post the patches to the
gcc list when they&#x
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 11:44 ---
Is this with -fno-strict-aliasing?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32758
--- Comment #16 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 14:00 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Sep 4 14:00:06 2007
New Revision: 128082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128082
Log:
2007-09-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #17 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 17:55 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Sep 4 17:54:56 2007
New Revision: 128094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128094
Log:
2007-09-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #18 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 17:58 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Sep 4 17:57:52 2007
New Revision: 128097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128097
Log:
2007-09-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #19 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:00 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:00:31 2007
New Revision: 128098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128098
Log:
2007-09-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #22 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 19:14 ---
Done.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 17:19 ---
Should be fixed now on EABI.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
.
--
Summary: gcj generates assembler errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 13:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33639
Author: aph
Date: Wed Oct 3 12:59:57 2007
New Revision: 128981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128981
Log:
2007-10-03 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 13:02 ---
Fixed.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20104
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 15:05
---
The failure is here:
package org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.impl;
public class CompilerOptions ...
{
void updateSeverity(long irritant, Object severityString) {
if (ERROR.equals
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 15:23
---
Ok, so the file was generated by ecj, but was ecj precompiled or interpreted?
What VM was ecj running on?
Does ecj generate this same bogus file for
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.impl.CompilerOptions
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 16:04
---
Forget that, second arg is a long. My mistake.
The compiled code is OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20104
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 14:06
---
Try it now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:07
---
Created an attachment (id=8264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8264&action=view)
patch
Try this patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:32
---
Please put the jars and .so files somewhere I can see them.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
||dot org
Status
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 18:46
---
.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
101 - 200 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
