[Bug debug/47498] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsched2-use-superblocks

at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-31 10:16:10 UTC --- Mine. Patch reverted in revision 169429, testing revised patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02260.html

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-31 11:03:11 UTC --- Revised patch under testing, posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02264.html

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/45130] -fcompare-debug failure with -Os -fsched-spec-load -fschedule-insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45130 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 04:31:41 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 04:31:35 2011 New Revision: 169513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169513 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/47498 PR debug/

[Bug debug/47501] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -Os -fmodulo-sched

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47501 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 04:31:40 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 04:31:35 2011 New Revision: 169513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169513 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/47498 PR debug/

[Bug debug/47498] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47498 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 04:31:40 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 04:31:35 2011 New Revision: 169513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169513 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/47498 PR debug/

[Bug debug/45136] -fcompare-debug failure with -Os -fschedule-insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45136 --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 04:31:41 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 04:31:35 2011 New Revision: 169513 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169513 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/47498 PR deb

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 --- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 04:53:05 UTC --- It appears to me that one possible solution is to add the -shared flag to liblto_plugin_la_LDFLAGS. This will cause libtool to fail the link if it can't create a dynamic library, s

[Bug debug/45136] -fcompare-debug failure with -Os -fschedule-insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45136 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47498] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47498 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47501] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -Os -fmodulo-sched

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47501 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 05:44:44 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 05:44:38 2011 New Revision: 169514 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169514 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 05:44:44 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 05:44:38 2011 New Revision: 169514 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169514 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 06:18:07 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 06:18:01 2011 New Revision: 169515 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169515 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * t

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 06:18:07 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 06:18:01 2011 New Revision: 169515 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169515 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * t

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 06:28:26 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 06:28:22 2011 New Revision: 169516 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169516 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 06:28:26 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Feb 2 06:28:22 2011 New Revision: 169516 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169516 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 --- Comment #18 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-02 07:31:42 UTC --- Created attachment 23210 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23210 Patch that exposes the problem at an earlier point Like this...

[Bug tree-optimization/45122] [4.6 Regression] -funsafe-loop-optimizations causes FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr27285.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122 --- Comment #18 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-03 06:01:43 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Feb 3 06:01:40 2011 New Revision: 169781 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169781 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimizati

[Bug debug/43092] [4.5 Regression] Wrong debuginfo with VTA and -fomit-frame-pointer/-mno-accumulate-outgoing-args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43092 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-03 06:04:07 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Feb 3 06:04:04 2011 New Revision: 169782 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169782 Log: PR debug/43092 PR rtl-optimizati

[Bug rtl-optimization/43494] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Overlooked dependency causes wrong scheduling, wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494 --- Comment #31 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-03 06:04:07 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Thu Feb 3 06:04:04 2011 New Revision: 169782 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169782 Log: PR debug/43092 PR rtl-optimizati

[Bug tree-optimization/45122] [4.6 Regression] -funsafe-loop-optimizations causes FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr27285.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/43494] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Overlooked dependency causes wrong scheduling, wrong code

||FIXED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #32 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-03 06:07:58 UTC --- Fixed

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #40 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-11 15:02:20 UTC --- Created attachment 23307 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23307 Patch that detects whether liblto_plugin.la was built as a shared library This ought to fix

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 --- Comment #41 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-12 12:02:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 12 12:02:24 2011 New Revision: 170070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170070 Log: ChangeLog: PR lto/47225 * Makefile.

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-12 13:05:10 UTC --- Created attachment 23317 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23317 Patch that fixes the bug Here's a patch that fixes the problem. Jakub, is it easy for you to test

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug bootstrap/47630] [4.6 regression] ICE in queue_insn, at haifa-sched.c:1322 compiling 64-bit libjava/java/lang/natString.cc

||DUPLICATE AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-12 13:49:55 UTC --- It most certainly is. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 47620 ***

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-14 11:26:44 UTC --- Mine

[Bug tree-optimization/47415] -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fpredictive-commoning -fno-tree-fre

||2011.02.14 11:26:59 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-14 11:26:59 UTC --- Mine

[Bug tree-optimization/47415] -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fpredictive-commoning -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-14 12:24:03 UTC --- Already fixed in revision 170050, with correct ChangeLog entry in revision 170051.

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:23 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:16 2011 New Revision: 170185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170185 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tre

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:35 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:31 2011 New Revision: 170186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170186 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tre

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:48 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:44 2011 New Revision: 170187 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170187 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:34 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:31 2011 New Revision: 170186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170186 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tre

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:37:01 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:56 2011 New Revision: 170188 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170188 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 *

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:21 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:16 2011 New Revision: 170185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170185 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tre

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:37:01 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:56 2011 New Revision: 170188 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170188 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 *

[Bug bootstrap/47402] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47402 --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 18:36:48 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Feb 15 18:36:44 2011 New Revision: 170187 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170187 Log: PR debug/47106 PR debug/47402 * tree-

[Bug c/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-15 21:51:26 UTC --- Mine

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-16 00:53:18 UTC --- Created attachment 23358 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23358 Patch that fixes the problem The problem is that we lost track at the first padding bit within a w

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23317|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-18 20:44:52 UTC --- Sorry, #c1 is a false alarm, git bisect pilot error. The failure is caused by r170260.

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 --- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 20:59:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 20:59:23 2011 New Revision: 170324 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170324 Log: PR debug/47620 PR debug/47630 * haifa

[Bug bootstrap/47630] [4.6 regression] ICE in queue_insn, at haifa-sched.c:1322 compiling 64-bit libjava/java/lang/natString.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 20:59:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 20:59:23 2011 New Revision: 170324 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170324 Log: PR debug/47620 PR debug/47630 * haifa

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 21:02:39 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:02:35 2011 New Revision: 170325 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170325 Log: PR tree-optimization/46620 * gcc.dg/p

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 21:15:09 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:15:01 2011 New Revision: 170328 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170328 Log: PR tree-optimization/46620 * tr

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 21:14:53 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:14:49 2011 New Revision: 170327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170327 Log: PR tree-optimization/46620 * gcc.dg/p

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-19 21:08:51 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:08:40 2011 New Revision: 170326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170326 Log: PR tree-optimization/46620 * gcc.dg/p

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-20 02:19:42 UTC --- Patch is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00981.html Deferred to 4.7.

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47858] [4.5/4.6 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-02-24 13:50:18 UTC --- I think it would make sense to model this call-site SRA as partial inlining. It wouldn't get us perfect debug info, but it would at least give us something sensible at the inlined e

[Bug target/58067] ICE in GFortran recog.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58067 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/58067] ICE in GFortran recog.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58067 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- As Andrew says, the problem with -mtls-dialect=gnu (the default) is lack of TLS support. The tls_get_addr calls expanded by tls_global_dynamic_64_ are not recognized by the corresponding insns because the c

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-19 15:50:04 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Oct 19 15:50:00 2011 New Revision: 180194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180194 Log: PR debug/49310 * var-tracking.c (loc

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20 16:46:29 UTC --- On it. FWIW, I don't get these failures with rev 180136, with or without the patch, and I can't trigger them at 180194 either. Can you get more info on what the failure is (say, de

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20 19:15:51 UTC --- Just tried with ld.gold instead, still no failure.

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20 19:57:41 UTC --- What kind of error are you getting from gdb 7.3? Since 7.2 is getting the correct info, that's the bug report that ought to be submitted to GDB.

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20 21:45:42 UTC --- Err, that doesn't seem to tell what errors you're getting from gdb. I know older GDB might cause tests to be skipped, but that's not the case here. I'm getting the expected 48 pass

[Bug debug/50799] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20 22:52:54 UTC --- Yep. That, or some other difference in the compiler's assembly output, that I asked for in comment 1.

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-25 04:05:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25605 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25605 Patch that restores earlier behavior, hiding the problem This patch restores the cselib/vta expans

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25605|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-25 04:14:15 UTC --- Steve, forgot to ask you to give the latest patch a try and let me know how it goes. I'm not sure yet why we don't trigger this problem on x86*. TIA,

[Bug middle-end/50770] limits-fndefn.c times out on ARM; runs 22 x faster with -fno-var-tracking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50770 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-25 04:38:34 UTC --- Michael, please fill in the target and any other configure options you used, and attach a preprocessed version of the source that exposes the problem, if the patch in r180194 didn't

[Bug tree-optimization/50693] Loop optimization restricted by GOTOs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693 --- Comment #23 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-25 04:48:24 UTC --- Yup. We don't even need a new debug stmt type, methinks. Say, emit the debug stmt with the LABEL_DECL, decay that to a debug stmt in cfgexpand, and turn that into a NOTE_INSN_DELE

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26 08:52:13 UTC --- Thanks. FTR, the reason we get this on PA64 and not on x86* (and probably not on PA32) is that pa_internal_arg_pointer sets up a pseudo to hold r29+offset. The pseudo is fwpropped i

[Bug debug/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26 13:32:57 UTC --- Nice, a testsuite run detected gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c -Os -g on i686-linux-gnu gets a debug stmt referencing a user variable using a debug temp as the address. Sadly, that exposes

[Bug debug/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26 13:47:56 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Oct 26 13:47:48 2011 New Revision: 180525 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180525 Log: PR debug/50826 * var-tr

[Bug debug/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26 13:55:25 UTC --- Shouldn't the testcase contain: // { dg-require-sched-yield "" } ? I'm getting a failure because this_thread::yield is not defined, and 30_threads/this_thread/2.cc contains this

[Bug debug/50869] [4.7 Regression] ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-27 17:18:46 UTC --- On it

[Bug debug/50869] [4.7 Regression] ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-27 20:46:12 UTC --- Created attachment 25638 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25638 Patch that fixes the bug, testing Here's a patch that fixes the bug. We don't want cselib to expa

[Bug debug/50869] [4.7 Regression] ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-11-01 02:09:04 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Nov 1 02:09:00 2011 New Revision: 180725 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180725 Log: PR debug/50869 *

[Bug debug/50869] [4.7 Regression] ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

||2012-04-30 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-04-30 12:11:08 UTC --- Mine. 1. I have vague

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-04-30 12:15:44 UTC --- Created attachment 27267 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27267 Proposed patch to fix the problem (testing) Here's the patch. It's much larger than needed, but s

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-11 13:27:15 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri May 11 13:27:03 2012 New Revision: 187404 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187404 Log: PR c++/53209 * pt.c (tsubst_decl): Bai

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-11 13:25:38 UTC --- Mine

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-11 13:52:00 UTC --- Fixed

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-15 04:25:40 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue May 15 04:25:25 2012 New Revision: 187497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187497 Log: PR c++/53209 * pt.c (tsubst_decl): Bai

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||49888 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oli

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-23 09:30:29 UTC --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01546.html

[Bug debug/48866] gcc hangs when -g is set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48866 --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 20:42:00 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jun 13 20:41:55 2012 New Revision: 188527 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188527 Log: PR debug/52983 PR debug/48866

[Bug rtl-optimization/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 20:42:00 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jun 13 20:41:55 2012 New Revision: 188527 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188527 Log: PR debug/52983 PR debug/48866

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 21:43:24 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jun 13 21:43:19 2012 New Revision: 188530 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188530 Log: PR debug/47624 * var-tr

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 21:43:54 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jun 13 21:43:51 2012 New Revision: 188531 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188531 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/49888 * var-tr

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 21:49:09 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. I'm going to look into backporting it.

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-13 21:57:39 UTC --- Fixed in mainline. Is there interest in a backport?

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

||2012-06-15 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-15 20:20:13 UTC --- I see the drap and some of

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-18 09:50:01 UTC --- It's a bit surprising, but I guess it makes sense. I'd reorder the initializers too, so that we release stuff in the reverse order of allocation.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >