[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100948] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:9069

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Setting a breakpoint in gfc_simplify_len, it appears that the substring length is not properly set: (gdb) p e->ref->type $4 = REF_SUBSTRING (gdb) p *e->ref->u.ss.start->value.integer._mp_d $15 =

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50967 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50967&action=edit Tentativ fix This patch would fix the testcase. It is inspired by code in primary.c, match_string_

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50967|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The variant with typespec and non-constant length is incorrectly rejected: program p integer :: n = 2 print *, [character(n) :: 'a', 'b'] end All versions since at least gcc-7 give: pr1009

[Bug fortran/100970] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/101069] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC

[Bug fortran/79524] [9/10/11/12 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment

[Bug fortran/101084] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101084 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/101084] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101084 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why on Earth would somebody really want to combine legacy MAX0 with IMPLICIT INTEGER*4 and -fdefault-integer-8? Reduced testcase: SUBROUTINE TEST IMPLICIT INTEGER*4 (I-N) MAXMN

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Untested potential fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c index 73b0bcc9dea..e578449995a 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/tran

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug middle-end/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/95501] ICE in gfc_match_pointer_assignment, at fortran/match.c:1422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/101123] [11/12 Regression] Invalid code for MAX0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101123 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/100283] [11/12 Regression] Call to MIN0 with integer(8) arguments raises an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100283 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/108336] Repeatable random_numbers with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108336 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is one flaw with the testcase: when OMP_NUM_THREADS > n1, array elements threadval(n1+1:OMP_NUM_THREADS) are filled with undefined values. When I replace the line if(omp_get_thread_num(

[Bug fortran/108131] [10/11 Regression] Incorrect bound calculation when bound intrinsic used in size expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > > + > > + mpz_clear (do_start); > > + mpz_clear (do_end); > > + mpz_clear (do_step); > >

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug fortran/108369] FM509 Fails to compile with error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108369 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/107508] Invalid bounds due to bogus reallocation on assignment with KIND=4 characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107508 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm regtesting the following patch which fixes both cases: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc b/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc index 711e9178ad4..33794f0a858 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/iresolve.cc +++ b

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108421] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108421 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/107214] [13 Regression] ICE: base pointer cycle detected since r13-2661-gb57abd072dd319a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107214 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107397 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|

[Bug fortran/106731] ICE on automatic array of derived type with DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106731 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 fro

[Bug fortran/108454] ICE in gfc_trans_common, at fortran/trans-common.cc:1385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108454 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-18 Statu

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-23 Keyword

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 54330 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54330&action=edit Patch for the ICE in get_expr_storage_size

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, |ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-23 Statu

[Bug fortran/108501] [13 Regression] ICE in get_expr_storage_size, at fortran/interface.cc:2941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108501 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108434] [12/13 Regression] ICE in class_allocatable, at fortran/expr.cc:5000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108434 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The reported issue should be fixed for gcc-13 and on 12-branch. There is another potential issue (see comment#1) which might be related to this one or not. Keeping this PR open until the finaliz

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-24 Statu

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > This fixes all testcases. These two helper functions can indicate > a problem occurs, so instead of asserting on (a->ts.type != BT_INTEGER) > return the CMP_

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch in comment#2 regtests cleanly. I can package it and submit if you agree.

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Assignee|unas

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.5.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108528] [13 Regression] ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108528 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I played a little and found a variation of testcase pr96102.f90 that was silently accepted but is rejected by Intel, NAG, Cray, NVidia: module m type mytype integer :: i end type type(m

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108544] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.cc:6135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108544 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/103506] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:4039 since r10-2798-ge68a35ae4a65d2b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-29 Ever confirme

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108609] New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-31 Statu

[Bug fortran/108651] Array Constructor with [type-spec:: fails to apply to all values, eg x = [integer(int64):: 1,2,3,4]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108651 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/108453] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:5361 since r6-3704-g2b3f52a2d0fb22ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108453 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108529] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in transformational_result, at fortran/simplify.cc:478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108529 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108420] [13 Regression] ICE in check_charlen_present, at fortran/iresolve.cc:98 since r13-4394-g3832c6f7e672e76b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108420 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/108502] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.cc:1295

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.5 Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/103259] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in resolve_common_vars, at fortran/resolve.c:956 since r11-3866-g4d2a56a0f7135469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/103259] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in resolve_common_vars, at fortran/resolve.c:956 since r11-3866-g4d2a56a0f7135469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/108693] Update shared character array inside OpenMP critical section causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108693 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/69636] ICE(s) on using option -fmodule-private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/69636] ICE(s) on using option -fmodule-private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- A slightly reduced & rewritten variant of the code in comment#6: module m implicit none private public :: cx, operator(+) private :: cx_plus_int! <- why does this make a differenc

[Bug fortran/69636] ICE(s) on using option -fmodule-private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/70817] Internal compiler error coarrays -finit-real=snan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70817 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/103779] ICE in gfc_convert_chartype, at fortran/intrinsic.c:5400

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103779 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103779] ICE in gfc_convert_chartype, at fortran/intrinsic.c:5400

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103779 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/103259] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in resolve_common_vars, at fortran/resolve.c:956 since r11-3866-g4d2a56a0f7135469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103259 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug tree-optimization/108757] We do not simplify (a - (N*M)) / N + M -> a / N

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108757 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I am not sure this can be done in the normal case unless you know the range > of a to be [64...INF] . > The wrap around case might be an issue ... > B

[Bug fortran/108527] [13 Regression] ICE in compare_bound_int(): Bad expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108527 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|10.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/108609] New test case gfortran.dg/pr108527.f90 in r13-5479-g22afa4947584c7 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108609 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 95107, which changed state. Bug 95107 Summary: ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/95107] ICE in hash_operand, at fold-const.c:3768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/103475] ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/103475] ICE in gfc_expr_attr, at fortran/primary.c:2782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/105167] ICE in gfc_set_default_type, at fortran/symbol.cc:298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105167 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/104321] Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > I think it is not only dead code but it should be also removed: > > Glancing at the code, the 'data = NULL;' does not make sense (cf. > 'memcpy(lhs,

[Bug fortran/104346] Problem with overloaded assignment when LHS is allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104346 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|U

[Bug fortran/104554] ICE in check_assumed_size_reference, at fortran/resolve.cc:1650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104554 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/103608] ICE in do_intent, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:3035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/103608] ICE in do_intent, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:3035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >