https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Jenner ---
Sorry for my lack of communication on this. Realistically, it doesn't look like
I'm going to be able to get the powerpcspe port to the appropriate state by the
GCC 8 rc1, so please feel free to deprecate or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
Andrew Jenner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #43312|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #52 from Andrew Jenner ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #51)
> Absolutely. Where should I test the patch? Natively on powerpcspe? On
> x86_64? Or anything else? We have a wide range of architectures available
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #58 from Andrew Jenner ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #57)
> Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch?
>
> It doesn't fully apply for me.
Acknowledged. I will try to get to that late
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #61 from Andrew Jenner ---
Sorry, once again I have been totally swamped by other work. It's now looking
like I should have some time to work on this in early July.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Jenner ---
Sorry for the lack of comment from me - I only just saw this bug (I was not
receiving email from bugzilla but hopefully I have fixed this now).
I am part-way through the cleanup. I will commit what I have so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Jenner ---
I have been reading gcc-patches and keeping a list of the rs6000 changes that I
will need to port. I will go through the svn log for rs6000 as well to make
sure I haven't missed anything. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Jenner ---
Created attachment 43312
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43312&action=edit
Patch in progress so far
at gcc dot gnu.org |andrewjenner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Jenner ---
I've got most of the major chunks removed now as you can see from my
work-in-progress patch, but I'm still working through a long list of little
things I've noticed that need cleaning u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Jenner ---
I have committed a patch to the .opt files:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00114.html
I have also submitted a patch to the documentation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00115.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Jenner ---
I have committed another small patch to the .opt files:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00247.html
and updated my docs patch per Joseph's feedback:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Jenner ---
I'm still actively working on it. The patch is close to ready for commit now, I
think - I'm going to try to get it committed by the end of the week.
||andrewjenner at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Jenner ---
Fixed on mainline and OG13. I will apply the commit to GCC 13 after the grace
period.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 110415, which changed state.
Bug 110415 Summary: (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic
variable from allocatable polymorphic function result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415
14 matches
Mail list logo
