https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
according with Vector ABI vectorized variant in AVX ISA of
#pragma omp declare simd notinbranch
void callee(double, double*);
expects ymm0 filled with 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80481
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Senkevich ---
Reload phase adds insn 1817 (1)
(insn 856 855 1817 136 (set (reg:V16SI 22 xmm1 [orig:985 vect__72.36 ] [985])
(unspec:V16SI [
(mem:V16SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 39 r10 [orig:206 vectp.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Senkevich ---
(In reply to amker from comment #13)
> We should create another PR for additional copy instructions after my patch
> and close this one. IMHO they are two different issues.
I agree, currently there are
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41242
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41242&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Hi,
as was found in pr78116 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Senkevich ---
Created pr80481.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Senkevich ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #8)
> > I think we should follow here declarations from icc headers to be compatible
> > with it.
> Okay. Could yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Senkevich ---
Hi,
are these intrinsics needed to be backported?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82459
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
Created attachment 34340
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34340&action=edit
reduced test
Hi,
compilation failed with the following code in log.c:
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64421
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64421
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.senkevich at gmail
dot co
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
-bash-4.2$ cat ./test_vlen8.c
#include
extern __m512d _ZGVeN8v_func (__m512d);
double func_vlen8 (double x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #11 from Andrew
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andrew.n.senkevich at gmail dot com
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
We shouldn't turn
call foo@plt
into
load foo@plt into %eax
call *%eax
We should keep
call/jmp *foo@GOT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67215
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Senkevich ---
-bash-4.2$ cat test.c
extern int proc2(int);
int proc( void)
{
int i = proc2( 3);
return i;
}
gcc test.c -S -pie -fpie -o test.1.S
gcc test.c -S -pie -fpie -fno-plt -o test.2.S
-bash-4.2$ cat test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67215
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Senkevich ---
-bash-4.2$ cat test.c
extern char* mem(int);
char* arr[32];
void proc(void)
{
int i;
for (i=0;i<32;i++)
arr[i] = mem(128);
}
gcc -pie -fpie -fno-plt -O2 -S test.c -o test_32.S -m32
gcc -pie -fp
22 matches
Mail list logo
