http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54684
Bug #: 54684
Summary: bootstrap broken with --disable-checking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Tobler 2011-12-20
15:57:36 UTC ---
Seems to work. At least in stage one, compiling gcc.
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Tobler 2011-12-30
10:59:03 UTC ---
Works too:
+sed = "s/\\[\\[noreturn\\]\\]/__attribute__((__noreturn__))/";
+test_text = "#define _Noreturn __attribute__((__noreturn__))";
Looks less cryptic, iow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Tobler 2011-12-30
18:06:27 UTC ---
Neither bash nor GNU sed is installed on this machine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Tobler 2011-12-30
18:54:53 UTC ---
On another machine:
egrep "SED|SHELL" *
config.log:SED='/usr/local/bin/gsed'
config.log:SHELL='/bin/sh'
Works too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Tobler 2012-01-06
15:57:51 UTC ---
Bootstrap in progress with the below.
Additions:
- Jakub's recent comment on c_fix_arg.
- extend mach to match FreeBSD10.* to FreeBSD19.* (Should give some time...)
+ * g++ -std=c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
--- Comment #34 from Andreas Tobler 2012-01-09
20:32:00 UTC ---
Just to double check, shall I leave the backslash in this line?
c_fix_arg = "__attribute__\(\(__noreturn__\)\)";
And more important, do we have an ok for a commit of this patch?
||
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #45 from Andreas Tobler 2012-01-11
07:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 26297
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26297
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #46 from Andreas To
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Tobler 2012-01-11
16:23:57 UTC ---
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:23:48 2012
New Revision: 183096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183096
Log:
2012-01-11 Bruce Korb
Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89125
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Tobler ---
I can confirm this finding with the attached patch.
There is an improvement in the gcc results but no improvement/degradation in
the other results. Tested on yesterday's trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89125
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Tobler ---
where ever we place it, it'll be an improvement. Make sense to place it in
config/freebsd.c, then it is FreeBSD only.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Apr 27 19:14:05 2018
New Revision: 259722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259722&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-04-27 Andreas Tobler
Maryse Levavasseur
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
A recent commit (260054) broke bootstrap on FreeBSD. The reason is an undefined
reference to 'backtrace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37073
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |andreast at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |andreast at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-02-08 00:00:00 |2018-4-1
--- Comment #3 from Andreas To
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler ---
I can do a backport w/o an open PR' right? If so, then the PR can be set to
resolved.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Tobler 2012-11-17
12:36:16 UTC ---
Just for clarification, the following commits (after #14) in this PR did not
resolve the bootstrap issue. I was on r193501 when I first encountered the
comparison failure and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
PowerPC FreeBSD does not support 128-bit floating point yet.
Bootstrap on this target is broken because of undefined
at gcc dot gnu.org |andreast at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler ---
patch request is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00242.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Feb 3 22:15:21 2016
New Revision: 233111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-03 Andreas Tobler
PR bootstrap/69611
* config/rs60
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Thu Feb 16 21:23:51 2017
New Revision: 245520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-16 Andreas Tobler
PR sanitizer/79562
* sanitizer_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Feb 17 19:21:39 2017
New Revision: 245546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245546&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Andreas Tobler
Backported from mainline
2017-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Feb 17 19:23:28 2017
New Revision: 245547
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245547&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Andreas Tobler
Backported from mainline
2017-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Tobler ---
Could you please tell us the FreeBSD version and arch you run on?
uname -ra
at gcc dot gnu.org |andreast at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Tobler ---
For the record, in gcc5 this one went in:
md_unwind_header=i386/freebsd-unwind.h
Before we had no MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR.
Will investigate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Tobler ---
Will soon commit a fix, for gcc6/7/8 on FreeBSD > 9.3. Older gcc's and OS
releases will not be supported by this fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Tobler ---
The gcc5 branch is closed, so I can not commit there. In the ports tree we're
on gcc6 as default gcc. We still can build gcc5. I certainly can talk to Gerald
to make an exception or whatever and patch the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Sat Nov 4 19:40:23 2017
New Revision: 254411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-04 Andreas Tobler
PR libgcc/82635
* config/i386/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Sun Nov 5 19:30:41 2017
New Revision: 254431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-05 Andreas Tobler
Backport from mainline
2017-11-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Sun Nov 5 19:33:44 2017
New Revision: 254432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254432&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-05 Andreas Tobler
Backport from mainline
2017-11-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82635
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Tobler ---
Here a native build seems to succeed, right now in stage three with sources
from today.
[tritium:head/objdir/gcc] andreast% grep -i fbsd_major *
Makefile:tm_defines= LIBC_GLIBC=1 LIBC_UCLIBC=2 LIBC_BIONIC=3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Tobler ---
Btw, cool bug ID ;) 0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Tobler ---
Unfortunately the build fails with:
/usr/local/bin/ld: libbackend.a(tree-diagnostic.o): bad reloc symbol index
(0x1 >= 0x39) for offset 0x3ee6 in section `.debug_info'
libbackend.a: error adding symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Tobler ---
Here my patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00839.html
I do not like to hardcode a version number. Would mean to update when needed..
The important thing here is, if you build a cross com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Apr 17 17:50:46 2015
New Revision: 222192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65535
* config.gcc: Exit with a comment when we do not have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
Bug 47093 depends on bug 47123, which changed state.
Bug 47123 Summary: *freebsd configurations configure, but don't build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47123
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Tobler ---
I see the same failures on sparc-solaris 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Tobler ---
For the record from my side:
sparc-solaris and arm*-*-freebsd* are also affected. Applying the line from #6
cures the bootstrap on arm. But sparc-solaris is still broken, 66252 is the
pointer there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2015-04-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Tobler ---
FreeBSD/amd64 is back to normal too, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg03141.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63699
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Tue Dec 1 20:15:35 2015
New Revision: 231128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-01 Andreas Tobler
PR libffi/65726
* Makefile.def (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Tobler ---
I will wait until gcc5 opens again and then I back-port this patch to gcc5 and
gcc49.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Dec 4 19:51:35 2015
New Revision: 231301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-04 Andreas Tobler
Backport from mainline
2015-12-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Fri Dec 4 20:25:13 2015
New Revision: 231305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-04 Andreas Tobler
Backport from mainline
2015-12-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68617
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-21
11:34:32 UTC ---
This was my fault. I have in mind that my breakage happened between 4.2 and
4.3. (And you write that 4.2.4 is ok, right?)
Unfortunately we can not update/downgrade to this revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-21
15:46:44 UTC ---
svn diff -r 122895:122896 m68k.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
14:16:13 UTC ---
I need some time to bisect. I'll let you know asap which version is the
breaking one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
16:56:53 UTC ---
Ok. The breaking revision is 121736.
If you add this to m68k/netbsd-elf.h it compiles.
#undef STRICT_ALIGNMENT
#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 0
I had to disable libgomp too since this n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #26 from Andreas To
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
20:38:28 UTC ---
Unfortunately the issue is not solved yet. I was informed that 68010 needs
STRICT_ALIGNMENT. So I have to think about how to solve this.
Afaik, netbsd has 68010 machines (Sun?).
Lea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #32 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
22:15:28 UTC ---
The last build was successful with commenting BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT and adding
PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY 32.
I'll continue later.
Thanks Andreas!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #33 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-28
16:58:53 UTC ---
I was able to build a cross gcc with the patch below.
But I do not know if this correct. Especially I do not know if we can lower the
BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT. If not, I do not know how to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Tobler ---
Hi Tobias,
on FreeBSD-12.1, the ld is from binutils 2.17, a really old one.
Try to configure with '--with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld
'. Prerequisite is the installation of the binutil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler ---
First, excuse me Thomas, I was focused on 'Tobias' from the description text.
It seems to pass bootstrap with /usr/bin/ld on FreeBSD-13. The test suite will
tell more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler ---
Any news on this? Or can we close this PR?
TIA,
Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler ---
Regarding comment #10, Steve is right with his guess, configure doesn't find
the fenv functionalities needed. The reason is pretty simple, for aarch64 and
powerpc, they are not public. A quick trial showed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Tobler ---
I try to find some spare cycles to look into. But I can only investigate the
aarch64 part. The powerpcs are gone here.
78 matches
Mail list logo