[Bug c++/64948] Lambda reference capture initialization in template function creates segmentation fault

2015-02-09 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948 Andrea Azzarone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrea.azzarone at canonical dot c

[Bug c++/64948] Lambda reference capture initialization in template function creates segmentation fault

2015-02-09 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Azzarone --- (In reply to Andrea Azzarone from comment #1) > Created attachment 34705 [details] > Proposed fix to allow the use of enable_if for UDLs. Sorry this patch was for a different bug report. Please delete it i

[Bug c++/64959] SFINAE in UDLs

2015-02-09 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64959 Andrea Azzarone changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrea.azzarone at canonical dot c

[Bug c++/65047] New: [c++17] Add support for nested namespace defintions.

2015-02-12 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com Gcc should support nested namespace defintions as per N4230. Basically it allows to do stuff like this: namespace A::B { ... }

[Bug c++/65047] [c++17] Add support for nested namespace defintions.

2015-02-12 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Azzarone --- Created attachment 34745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34745&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug c++/65047] [c++17] Add support for nested namespace defintions.

2015-02-13 Thread andrea.azzarone at canonical dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Azzarone --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Patches should go to the gcc-patches list not bugzilla (it's not a bug that > we have incomplete support for an incomplete draft standard) Ok, thanks. Actual