http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54356
Bug #: 54356
Summary: ICE in output_pic_addr_const
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54357
Bug #: 54357
Summary: ICE in output_pic_addr_const
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54358
Bug #: 54358
Summary: ICE in output_pic_addr_const
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54358
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Adam 2012-08-23 11:46:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 28072
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28072
original source file with comments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54358
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Adam 2012-08-23 13:49:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes, definitely invalid. With PIC p is not correct constraint for any code
> label, address of a variable etc., all that requires adding some offset to the
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: alexander.adam at informatik dot tu-chemnitz.de
Created attachment 32956
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32956&acti
