http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-14
18:18:07 UTC ---
Properly fixed here; awaiting approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01003.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-20
14:30:50 UTC ---
Vincent, this is bug 47340. I will be looking at this today.
||2011.01.25 15:13:02
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47340
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47520
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47554
Summary: [trans-mem] expand_expr_addr_expr_1 ICE
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassi
||2011.01.31 17:42:35
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-31
17:42:35 UTC ---
Created attachment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47554
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-31
17:43:11 UTC ---
./cc1plus b.C -O0 -fgnu-tm -fdump-tree-all -fdump-ipa-all -quiet
b.C: In member function 'list list::_M_get_Tp_allocator() const':
b.C:14:38: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_
||2011.01.31 18:21:35
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-31
18:21:35 UTC ---
Fixed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02325.html
||2011.02.03 16:20:05
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-03
16:20:05 UTC ---
Awaiting approval
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47573
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47492
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-04
15:31:14 UTC ---
Patrick. It's already on my TODO. I'm working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-04
18:40:09 UTC ---
Patrick, the reason memory allocated by the C++ new operator does not get
optimized by the TM-memopt pass is not because of a missing ECF_MALLOC
attribute, but because the alias orac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47554
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-04
20:16:07 UTC ---
Yes, this is an improvement, because once has to figure out why the unadultered
new operator is not handled specially by the alias oracle. You are welcome to
file a PR as an enhance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47554
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47611
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-11
14:42:35 UTC ---
Awaiting approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00742.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-11
18:18:11 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Feb 11 18:18:09 2011
New Revision: 170057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170057
Log:
PR 46567
* trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-15
15:37:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 23351
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23351
further reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47689
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-16
15:21:49 UTC ---
*** Bug 47689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47747
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-16
16:23:33 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Feb 16 16:23:28 2011
New Revision: 170213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170213
Log:
PR 47690
* trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_exe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-21
22:49:36 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Feb 21 22:49:34 2011
New Revision: 170377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170377
Log:
PR 47746
* trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_ins
at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-23
19:32:53 UTC ---
Patrick.
Ok, in that case we have two bugs. Your original testcase ICEing on valid
code, and my incorrectly reduced testcase which is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23243|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-24
19:08:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 23459
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23459
Additional ICE on incorrect code
At -O0 we get a correct diagnosis for this incorrect snippet:
b.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47905
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47905
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-28
23:25:00 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Feb 28 23:24:57 2011
New Revision: 170578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170578
Log:
PR 47905
* trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47905
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50076
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-09-19
15:37:37 UTC ---
I will be contributing a testing harness that is back-end agnostic, so it won't
depend on scanning the assembly. Stay tuned.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50964
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
|middle-end
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-05-22
16:40:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Aldy,
>
> Actually the problem is different that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-05-25
17:14:31 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri May 25 17:14:25 2012
New Revision: 187887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187887
Log:
PR middle-end/53008
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-05-30
22:13:48 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed May 30 22:13:43 2012
New Revision: 188030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188030
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-05-25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-05-31
19:46:49 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu May 31 19:46:43 2012
New Revision: 188081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188081
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52558
* cfg.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-01
16:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 27543
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27543
Proposed patch by Richard Henderson-- untested
This is an old, untested patch from rth that attempt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rth at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
15:51:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27556
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27556
propsed patch being tested
Whoops, sorry Patrick. I already have a patch I am testing :). If you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:08:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 27303 [details]
> RBTree microbenchmark test case
>
> I believe that I'm seeing this in the RSTM suite's RBTree microbenchmark as
> well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:51:33 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:51:24 2012
New Revision: 188190
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188190
Log:
PR middle-end/47530
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-04
16:52:55 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Jun 4 16:52:47 2012
New Revision: 188191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188191
Log:
PR middle-end/47530
* trans-mem.c (expand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51997
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #21 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-14
19:22:54 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Jun 14 19:22:48 2012
New Revision: 188631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188631
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52558
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-14
21:15:10 UTC ---
FYI, backported to 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #23 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-07-02
18:25:42 UTC ---
BTW, for anyone still stuck on this, you need to use the following when
compiling the testcase:
--param allow-store-data-races=0
Eventually, this will be the default for C++1x, or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52047
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-06
14:42:11 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Feb 6 14:42:07 2012
New Revision: 183936
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183936
Log:
PR middle-end/52047
* trans-mem.c
||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-06
14:44:31 UTC ---
fixed on trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-09
16:23:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26622
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26622
proposed (untested) patch
This is a first stab at the problem. It is untested, and there are defin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-14
15:15:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 26659
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26659
proposed patch
Actually Richard (rth), the restriction is less strict than that. We are
currently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-15
00:29:10 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Feb 15 00:29:06 2012
New Revision: 184251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184251
Log:
+ PR middle-end/52142
+ * ipa-inline.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-20
23:43:35 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Feb 20 23:43:31 2012
New Revision: 184417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184417
Log:
PR middle-end/52141
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-22
20:00:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> That's (essentially) independent of the target, as it's a pure testsuite
> issue.
> Tests that require linking with -litm should go in libitm/testsuite ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-02-28
20:08:44 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Feb 28 20:08:39 2012
New Revision: 184638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184638
Log:
PR middle-end/51752
* gimple.h (gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-03-05
18:38:56 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:38:47 2012
New Revision: 184949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184949
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
* trans-mem.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-03-06
14:38:00 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 6 14:37:54 2012
New Revision: 184991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184991
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
* trans-mem.c (tm_regi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-03-06
14:44:31 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 6 14:44:27 2012
New Revision: 184992
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184992
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
* trans-mem.c (tm_regi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548
Bug #: 52548
Summary: missed PRE optimization when function call follows
to-be hoisted variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
||2012-03-12
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
||amacleod at redhat dot com,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-03-12
15:29:06 UTC ---
> No, we don't want to fix this for 4.7 as this is not a regression.
>
> Yes, LIM only avoids introducing traps, not data-races. This was discussed
> in the past already, btw, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-04-10
17:07:22 UTC ---
Richard G., or perhaps another aliasing expert. I am working on a patch for
this problem. Could you pontificate as to why no optimization pass has been
able to figure out that g_2_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-04-11
13:37:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Both value-numbering (FRE/PRE, that do not run after store motion :/) and
> DOM should figure this out. DOM only in theory, but at least in this simple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-14 00:00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
FWIW, also works on 4.8.
||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Duplicate, according to comment by Patrick Marlier.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56572 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
*** Bug 56573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Well, we could tweak the inliner cost model, thus causing the early inliner to
inline the nested transactions earlier. With the attached patch, f() gets
inlined into g() early enough so that pass_ipa_tm sees
||2013-12-12
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Mine.
Proposed patch:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Dec 13 17:50:18 2013
New Revision: 205967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59149
* calls.c (flags_from_decl_or_type): Fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51163
Bug #: 51163
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/alias-1.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
||2011-11-16
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rth at gcc dot gnu.org,
||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
101 - 200 of 1818 matches
Mail list logo
