[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Aldy Herna

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/95653] [11 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_bb (gimple.h:1847) with -ftree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-scev-cprop

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95653 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug tree-optimization/95662] [11 regression] ICE at gimple-expr.c:87 since r11-1146

2020-06-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- This is likely a duplicate of pr95649 (see my note there), but I cannot verify as I don't have access to the spec2006 sources.

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-16 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez --- Hmmm, previous code propagating into PHI args had: - if (vr->singleton_p (&val) && may_propagate_copy (arg, val)) - propagate_value (use_p, val); We seem to have lost the check for consta

[Bug tree-optimization/95649] [11 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll since r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

2020-06-16 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/96397] GCC Fails to exploit ranges from overflow tests

2020-07-31 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96397 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/96430] internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

2020-08-03 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- Mine. Confirmed.

[Bug tree-optimization/96430] internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

2020-08-03 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96430 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/96540] gcc fails to build on Darwin 19.6.0

2020-08-10 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Does this patch fix the problem? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551660.html

[Bug c/96540] gcc fails to build on Darwin 19.6.0

2020-08-10 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/96813] [11 Regression] Broken bootstrap-lto-lean profiled bootstrap since r11-2883-gbf19cbc9cea6161f3deb63040601090828c44c53

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/96818] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 at -O since r11-2883

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/96822] [11 regression] Starting with r11-2833 ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96822 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||96818 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernande

[Bug middle-end/87798] EH lowering is creating a gimple_switch statement with type-incompatible index and case labels

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87798 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/96818] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 at -O since r11-2883

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/87798] EH lowering is creating a gimple_switch statement with type-incompatible index and case labels

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87798 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- And a C version: int a, b, c; void d() { unsigned short e; while (b) ; e = (e + 5) / 0; switch (e) case 0: case 3: c = a; }

[Bug tree-optimization/96823] ice from irange::irange_intersect

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- This is a duplicate of 96818. We're trying to intersect incompatible ranges because the switch control variable type is not the same as the label

[Bug tree-optimization/96818] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 at -O since r11-2883

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/96818] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 at -O since r11-2883

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernan

[Bug tree-optimization/96818] [11 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 at -O since r11-2883

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/96813] [11 Regression] Broken bootstrap-lto-lean profiled bootstrap since r11-2883-gbf19cbc9cea6161f3deb63040601090828c44c53

2020-08-27 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/96967] [11 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

2020-09-08 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96967 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/96967] [11 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984

2020-09-08 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96967 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/92131] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect assumption that (ao >= 0) is always false

2019-10-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92131 --- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Oct 17 12:38:38 2019 New Revision: 277107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277107&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/92131 * tree-vrp.c (value_range_bas

[Bug tree-optimization/92111] [10 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dom

2019-10-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92111 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Please include any flags that were used in building things. For example, it looks like it needs at least -std=c++17 to work. I can't reproduce with a ./cc1plus -O2. I also can't reproduce with -flto: ./x

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

2013-02-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

2013-02-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

2013-02-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #9 from Al

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

2013-02-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom

2013-02-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-02-07 CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-07 16:11:34 UTC --- Isn't this a duplicate of PR 52272? That is, fixing 52272,

[Bug middle-end/55943] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx

2013-02-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-02-07 CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-07 21:13:06 UTC --- Confirmed with a cross to --target=ia64-linux-gnu.

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-07 22:44:17 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-07 23:24:42 UTC --- Further reduced testcase, reproducible on both C and C++: float farg; unsigned val; void __attribute__((optimize("O"))) test() { val = __builtin_ceilf(farg); }

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-09 19:07:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29404 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29404 untested patch Untested proposed patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom

2013-02-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52868 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regression of 410.bwaves on x86.

2013-02-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-09 19:15:15 UTC --- *** Bug 52868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

2013-02-11 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

2013-02-12 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/56290] [4.8 Regression] ICE building OpenFOAM in in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

2013-02-12 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-02-12 CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-12 17:13:18 UTC --- Confirmed with OpenFOAM 2.1.1. I'll see if I can narrow this down.

[Bug middle-end/56290] [4.8 Regression] ICE building OpenFOAM in in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

2013-02-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-13 17:14:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29441 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29441 testcase Preprocessed testcase reproducible with ./cc1plus -O3

[Bug middle-end/56290] [4.8 Regression] ICE building OpenFOAM in in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

2013-02-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56265] [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

2013-02-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

2013-02-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/56140] GCC inlines incorrect function in __transaction_relaxed

2013-02-15 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56140 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

2013-02-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-19 00:04:59 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Feb 19 00:04:49 2013 New Revision: 196129 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196129 Log: PR target/52555 * genopinit.c

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

2013-02-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

2013-02-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

2013-02-20 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-20 15:43:34 UTC --- Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00947.html

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

2013-02-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-02-21 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Ever Confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

2013-02-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-21 20:16:34 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Feb 21 20:16:26 2013 New Revision: 196213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196213 Log: PR middle-end/56108 * trans-me

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

2013-02-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56140] GCC inlines incorrect function in __transaction_relaxed

2013-02-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56140 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

2013-02-22 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-22 14:54:32 UTC --- Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg01058.html

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

2013-02-26 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-26 12:40:36 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Feb 26 12:40:27 2013 New Revision: 196282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196282 Log: PR c++/56419 * semantics.c (be

[Bug c++/56419] [4.8 regression] transactions in for-loops disappear

2013-02-26 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.7/4.8/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.7/4.8/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-28 15:49:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29555 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29555 proof of concept: untested

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

2013-03-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2013-03-05 CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|Compiler ICE when compiling |[4.8 Regression] Compiler

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

2013-03-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-05 16:24:35 UTC --- Created attachment 29588 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29588 reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-05 18:00:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29590 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29590 WIP: proposed patch special casing constant phi arguments Ian. Sure, I can handle SSA_

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-06 16:11:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29599 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29599 do not set overflow on [+-]INF This is Richi's suggestion from comment 10. The problem i

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-06 16:28:12 UTC --- Oh, no worries Ian. I totally agree. I just wanted to put all this out there, since I'm unfortunately about to drop it. We should probably close this as a WONTFIX, or perh

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

2013-03-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-06 17:54:41 UTC --- This is ICEing here: /* ?? If this fails, we should temporarily restore the default target first (set_cfun (NULL) ??), do the rest of this function, and then res

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

2013-03-06 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-06 23:01:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created attachment 29601 [details] > Tentative patch > > How about this patch? Only lightly tested. It fixes the testcase > and the pr43564.c f

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

2012-08-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-08-21 17:46:26 UTC --- My bad... I'm on this.

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

2012-09-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

2012-09-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-05 22:43:03 UTC --- Created attachment 28137 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28137 proposed patch Proposed patch using the simulate-thread harness.

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

2012-09-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-07 16:00:18 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Sep 7 16:00:07 2012 New Revision: 191079 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191079 Log: PR testsuite/54184 * gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c: D

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

2012-09-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

2012-09-07 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-09-07 CC||amacleod at redhat dot com AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Aldy

[Bug middle-end/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

2012-09-11 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-11 12:28:11 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Sep 11 12:28:02 2012 New Revision: 191179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191179 Log: PR middle-end/54149 * tree-ssa-loo

[Bug middle-end/54149] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model

2012-09-11 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

2012-09-12 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12 19:52:55 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

2012-09-12 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12 19:52:55 UTC --- I'll take a look. --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-12 19:53:30 UTC --- I'll take a look.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

2012-09-14 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-14 21:20:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28195 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195 reduced testcase Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.

[Bug middle-end/52173] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly caused by itm

2012-09-19 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-09-21 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-21 20:11:43 UTC --- Mine.

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-21 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-21 20:12:55 UTC --- Created attachment 28245 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28245 proposed patch being tested

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-25 18:47:40 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Sep 25 18:47:35 2012 New Revision: 191742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191742 Log: PR middle-end/53850 * trans-me

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46480] [trans-mem] Uninstrumented code path is missing

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-09-25 CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug c++/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

2012-10-11 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

2012-10-11 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-10-11 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-11 20:29:13 UTC --- Created attachment

[Bug tree-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

2012-10-14 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-14 12:51:15 UTC --- Created attachment 28444 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28444 reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

2012-10-14 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

2012-10-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-17 20:59:43 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Oct 17 20:59:40 2012 New Revision: 192548 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192548 Log: PR rtl-optimization/54900 * if

[Bug middle-end/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

2012-10-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-17 21:18:21 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Oct 17 21:18:16 2012 New Revision: 192549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192549 Log: PR middle-end/54893 * tran

[Bug middle-end/54893] unable to access volatile variable within relaxed transaction

2012-10-17 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54906] write introduction incorrect wrt the C++11 memory model (case with atomic accesses)

2012-10-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-18 23:44:01 UTC --- resolved with patch to 54900.

[Bug rtl-optimization/54900] write introduction incorrect wrt the C11 memory model (2)

2012-10-18 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-18 23:46:04 UTC --- I am leaving this PR open while I address the corner case presented by Jakub somewhere in this thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01763.html ...though te

[Bug c/46480] [trans-mem] Uninstrumented code path is missing

2012-11-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46654] [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

2010-12-20 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46941] [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

2010-12-22 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46941] [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

2010-12-23 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-12-23 16:19:12 UTC --- Patrick. You will find out that when hacking on GCC, everything is intrusive in non-obvious ways :). What I had in mind was something simple like this, since push_cp_library_fn() on

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >