https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94530
--- Comment #6 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
yeah I noticed that too while testing the backport.
This should solve the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/543816.html
Thanks
Andrea
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As discussed here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
bare-metal (newlib) aarch64-none-elf build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
--- Comment #50 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
I've opened a dedicated bug for the discussed build issue:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94694
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
--- Comment #52 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah sorry
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
GCC invoked as 'gcc foo.c --save-temps -o foo.out' produces an assembly
file named 'foo.out-foo.s'.
AFAIU this is consequence of "1dedc12d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375
--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 48968
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48968&action=edit
pr96375 lob tests patch
Hi Christophe,
The following patch does the job for me. Would you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96968
--- Comment #3 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirm this was introduced by:
0d7e5fa655e59c99035bf94a46c912e369bb9fa0
"aarch64: Add 64 bit setter getter fpsr fpcr"
I'll have a look as soon as I have a slot of time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97075
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: akrl
Date: Thu Oct 3 12:39:55 2019
New Revision: 276507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/91928
* ipa-cp.c (ipa_cp_c_finalize):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91928
--- Comment #2 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: akrl
Date: Sat Oct 5 09:02:25 2019
New Revision: 276625
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276625&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR jit/91928
gcc/ChangeLog
2019-10-05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141
--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi all,
this is so far my understanding of what is going on here:
While in expand the vector builder is trying to build to determine elt number 3
of a vector of POLY_INT_CST.
To do that the step
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97092
--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi all,
I can't reproduce this on current master (76a1719f0ff), I guess has been
fixed in the meanwhile?
Andrea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97727
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97104
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96968
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49928
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49928&action=edit
reproducer
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #12 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Right LE is 4 bytes, good catch thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #13 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted here:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565044.html>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50205
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50205&action=edit
reproducer
Hi all,
to reproduce with the attached:
=
$ gcc libgccjit_repro.c -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99723
--- Comment #3 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A fix was proposed here:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602349.html>
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hi all,
In GNU Emacs we use (in order to have all callee saved registers pushed on the
stack before entering in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115132
--- Comment #2 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Richard,
thanks, yes I tried that already, the trouble is that our code looks more like
this:
=
extern void flush_stack_call_func1 (void (*func) (void *arg), void *arg);
extern void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58416
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
29 matches
Mail list logo
