On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 14:28, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> In that case the obvious solution is for the NetBSD configuration to start
> using that one function from ieee754-df.S. (I checked that the
> implementations in GCC of __float* already had corresponding
> implementations of _
On 18/10/2019 19:43, AlwaysTeachingable . wrote:
> The following C code:
> unsigned int wrong(unsigned int n){
> return (n%2) ? 0 : 42;
> }
>
> should return 42 when n is odd and 0 when n is even.
No. Your code returns 42 when n is even.
It's equivalent to "return ((n%2) != 0) ? 0 : 42;"
Now i
You would probably be better of discussing this on gcc-help. gcc-bugs
is rather full of bugzilla traffic and normal mails are easily missed.
Have you tried setting CONFIG_SHELL in the environment? Also, when
running the build use something like
make SHELL=/bin/bash
R.
On 03/11/14 20:22, Micha
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:28, opensource at artnaseef dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From opensource at artnaseef dot com 2004-12-13
> 15:28 ---
> Subject: Re: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on
> ARM due to missing frames
>
> Two things
>
> 1. Why do you not thin
On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
>>
>> --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
>> I'm not sure how relevant the netbsd-elf port is these day
On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 04.07.2018 20:55, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383
>>
On 10/07/18 10:57, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>>
te:
>>> On 06.07.2018 15:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/18 12:11, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>>> On 06.07.2018 12:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/07/18 11:32, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04.0
On 09/08/18 21:08, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86904
>
> Bug ID: 86904
>Summary: Column numbers ignore tab characters
>Product: gcc
>Version: unknown
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>
On 02/11/16 11:57, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
>
> --- Comment #52 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> (In reply to wilco from comment #51)
>>
>> Indeed, that's the reason behind the existing check. However it disables all
>> profitable bswap
10 matches
Mail list logo
