http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Emmanuel Thomé changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
gcc 8.1.0 here.
The following simple code expectedly fails to compile with -std=c++98 because
of the do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86733
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Thomé ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Presumably the handling for the pragma just turns the option on without
> considering the current cxx_dialect.
It seems to me that it is not consistent with t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86733
--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Thomé ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Emmanuel Thomé from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> > > Presumably the handling for the pragma just turns the opti
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44477
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44477&
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
Hi.
The following code should cause a warning.
#include
void what(mpz_t a, mpz_t p, gmp_randstate_t rstate)
{
mpz_urandomm(a,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62294
--- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Thomé ---
Thanks.
E.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
In the code below, gcc version 4.8.4, 4.9.3, and 5.2.0 fail to resolve the
expression temp != a->x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67418
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Thomé ---
ok thanks. Indeed it's more an enhancement request then.
