--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-13
18:10 ---
Subject: Re: 4.1.0 doesn't build in 64bit on PA-RISC
> As development perl was unable to complete it's testsuite with the installed
> 4.1.0/64, I went back to 4.0.3, where all works wel
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-13
21:30 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> > r108425 | law | 2005-12-12 19:59:16 + (Mon, 12 Dec 2005)
> What I suspect is goin
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-18
17:57 ---
Subject: Re: [hppa64] Bad dwarf output using non-preserved base register
> --- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-18 17:31
> ---
> I thought this was fixed for
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-19
17:09 ---
Subject: Re: gcc generates unreachable branch
> --- Comment #3 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-19 15:52 ---
> I think this is a bit different, the bit of code that causes the prob
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-22
18:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
> I bet this was caused by the IA64 scheduler improvements on 2006-03-16.
That's probably a good c
--- Comment #21 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-23
17:49 ---
Subject: Re: 4.1.0 doesn't build in 64bit on PA-RISC
> stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/pa20_64/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -g -O2
> -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototype
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-26
15:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect handling of -B by gfortran driver
I've attached details of the linking.
Dave
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-26
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-26
21:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect handling of -B by gfortran driver
> Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran
> -B/test/gn
> u/gcc-4.1/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../
> /test
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-29
19:53 ---
Subject: Re:
../../../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/AbstractMethodGenerator.java:1:
fatal error
> There are 2 parts to this bug.
>
> First, there's no reason to buil
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-31
15:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871
> --- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 15:04
> ---
> Breakpoint 1, make_decl_
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-04-05
23:08 ---
Subject: Re: g++ (3.3): ...Error: Field out of range (optimisation pb)
>What|Removed |Ad
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-03 02:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols
> I'm waiting for feedback here; because this is a port-specific proble I can't
> test fixes on my own. Patch in b
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-03 22:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
> 18:24 ---
> (In reply to c
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-03 22:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied symbols
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
> 01:33 ---
> I'm waiting for
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-15 17:38 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
> > FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
>
> FWIW, the IA64 version of this was bug 19888. Bac
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-15 17:45 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20031215-1.c compilation, -O2
> I already filed this as bug 21541 when it started failing.
Forgot.
Bug 21541 isn't tagged to the hppa target. G
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-15 20:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
> The arena_size size change by itself is not sufficient. However,
> backporting the 4.0 changes fixes the fail.
I just re
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-05-19 23:10 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/eoshift.f90 -O0 execution test
> > I have no idea why it would only fail at -O0 though, the .original dump on
> > i586-linux looks fine, and the
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-04 20:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04
> 20:29 ---
> Very related to PR 218
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-05 14:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3
> --- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-05
> 11:17 ---
> The bootstrap failure on
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-06 14:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3
> I will need someone with accesss to hppa to binary search the miscompiled file
> from stage2 and send me a .i file.
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-06 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:00:57PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia
--- Additional Comments From dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
2005-06-09 21:53 ---
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: SIZE() matters?
Sorry, I'm away just now. I'll be back in the office on
Monday 13th June 2005
and will read your message then.
If the matter
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-11 16:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in stage3
> This is most likely the same as PR 22018 which has a reduced testcase but
> since I don't have access to
> hpp
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-17 23:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] intrinsic.c:2044: error: insn does not satisfy
its constraints
> This should have been fixed by:
> 2005-06-17 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-18 00:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612
internal error
> To me this looks like a binutils bug.
Quite possibly. However, I wanted a heads up until
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-18 02:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.91 20050612
internal error
> > To me this looks like a binutils bug.
>
> Quite possibly.
The link doesn't f
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-18 15:48 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90
> On linux, this code outputs 22 (EINVAL), while on freebsd it outputs 0. I
> suppose the reason of the failure is similar for other platform
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-06-18 16:52 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/dev_null.f90
> The redhat system that I checked, identifies /dev/null as "a
> special file" in null(4). The ftruncate man page specifically
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-16 01:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisf
Steve,
> CC||sje at cup dot hp dot com
Until this problem is looked at, I am using
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-16 14:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] crappy code (gcc.c-tortur
> cft: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01174.html
>
> --
>What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-17 01:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] crappy code (gcc.c-tortur
> On hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, we don't get as far:
>
> /test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/gfortran -B/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-18 15:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisf
> Fixed.
Thanks very much.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18897
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-19 04:27 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-19 03:35
> ---
> I don't believe libiberty had ever prop
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-19 06:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap
> A patch to ignore --disable-static is posted at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01371.html
Saw it.
> BT
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-19 22:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture
> I think you are thinking of a different test as
> gcc.c-torture/compile/20020210-1.c only a compile only
> and has no reference to l
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-19 22:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap
> Can you try this patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01400.html
>
> on AIX?
Worked for me.
Da
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-23 02:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memor
> --- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23
> 01:54 ---
> what release of gcc is used for
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-24 04:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memor
> If running stage1 genattrtab compiled without optimization requires more
> memory,
> then it requires more memory.
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-24 05:00 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build/genattrtab: out of memor
> If running stage1 genattrtab compiled without optimization requires more
> memory,
> then it requires more memory.
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-25 15:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] configure: Could not load
> Please try this patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7824&action=view
This fixes the problem on
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-27 20:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __c
> Would you mind retesting with this patch? I think it will fix the problems,
> but I'm not 100% sure.
Will do.
Dave
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-01 16:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Tree loop optimiza
> Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02156.html>.
Fixes the testsuite failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. No re
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-01 23:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: rtl_verify_flow_info
> - emit_insn_after (seq, get_insns ());
> + emit_insn_after (seq, entry_of_function ());
That looks better.
Dave
--
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-02 00:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert, at fold-co
> I get a different error at -O0:
> /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/vax-ultrix/libstdc++-v3/include/complex:522:
> internal
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-05 02:01 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
> Can you please give this a spin? The library used int where the compiler
> used
> INTEGER*4 in a few cases. I'm current
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-05 22:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
> Can you test this please?
>
> 2005-01-05 Tobias Schlueter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR fortran/19194
&
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-06 04:36 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
> Could you please try this patch to trans-io.c instead of the previous one?
>
> 2005-01-05 Tobias Schlueter <[EMA
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-06 23:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __c
> Dave, would you mind testing with this revision to the patch?
I'll try this evening. It's taken some time but I bel
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-08 17:39 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alias-2.c (test for excess er
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
> 17:35 ---
> I have a fix for this, the p
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-08 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execu
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
> 19:06 ---
> Can you manually test this test in
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-08 22:34 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alias-2.c (test for excess er
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
> 17:35 ---
> I have a fix for this, the p
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-12 02:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] MAX_OFILE_ALIGNMENT on PA HP-UX
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12
> 02:32 ---
> Hmm, I think pa abose of
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-15 16:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execu
> --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
> 12:39 ---
> Why is this a middle-end bug? Is
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-16 16:13 ---
Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16
> 16:08 ---
> This is now fixed right?
Shoul
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-16 23:17 ---
Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints
> > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16
> > 16:08 ---
> > This
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-18 01:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1
> I'll fix this bug, but you guys should understand that you aren't going to
> get
> sane debug info under stabs
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-30 15:22 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c: Unsatis
> For hpux, is this simply because we don't link against libm?
No, only copysign and copysignf are available under hpux up
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-02 15:28 ---
Subject: Re: wide character strings don't work on HP-UX
> --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-02 13:30
> ---
> > I have unsuccesfull tested: gcc
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-11 02:07 ---
Subject: Re: PCH largefile test fails on various platforms
> --- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11
> 01:54 ---
> Also fails on ia64-hpux.
Th
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-12 18:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault compilin
> > > Does not matter as it only effects only Ada so it qualifies and Mark
> wrote:
> > > "which affect o
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-12 19:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault compilin
> Although the lack of a milestone only indicates that fixing this bug
> isn't a target for any release of GCC, I pers
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-12 19:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault compilin
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Also note that it was a new feature introduced for C99 compliance
> > that caused the
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-13 02:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] g++.dg/abi/inline1.C fails on hp
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> > Looking at the testsuite results, this regression app
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-02-15 01:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] g++.dg/abi/inline1.C fails on hp
> > 3) I'm concerned that the proposed fix requires a linker fix. There won't
> >be a fix for HP-UX
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-11
16:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_in
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11
> 15:55 ---
> /* Verify the counts of basic block
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-11
18:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_in
> Here is a C example which is almost equivalent to the objective-C example:
> struct d
> {
> int a;
> };
> void abort(void);
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-18
13:17 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE at /cgraphunit.c:2907
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-18
> 04:31 ---
> I see that this looks fixed
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-27
02:14 ---
Subject: Re: make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 after buildin
> Was this done with -j2 or above?
No. However, I think I inadvertantly messed up the source with a
build in the source tree.
D
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-30
19:33 ---
Subject: Re: ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-operands.c:1
> Mine, I posted a patch for this already:
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02688.html>.
What about the garbled warn
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-30
19:45 ---
Subject: Re: ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-operands.c:1
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-30
> 19:37 ---
> if you are talking about how the quotes
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-10-31
18:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.0 Regression] ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefin ed symbol: typeinfo
for int
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 01:21:22PM -0500, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> On systems that do
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-01
01:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: in schedule_in
> Call for testing,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg2.html>.
I have a test going now on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. I w
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-01
03:08 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fa
>What|Removed |Ad
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-01
15:24 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] New libstdc++ testsuite fa
> Dave, do you have time to work out what patch is causing the problem? If
> not,
> please let me know, and I'll try to d
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-07 17:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-07
> 16:45 ---
> This testcase failure look like the
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-07 17:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-
>What|Removed |Ad
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-16 01:00 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 only] [hppa] try-catch program fails when
> > Which exception model (sjlj or dwarf2) are you using?
>
> sjlj for gcc-3.3. now that you mention it, i see that my 3.4
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-27 04:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function
> --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27
> 00:53 ---
> I'm going to guess that one
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-28 23:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function
> Do you think we could canonicalize only when
> we compare a function pointer to a function pointer
> (rather than when co
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-11-30 03:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function
> Do you think we could canonicalize only when
> we compare a function pointer to a function pointer
> (rather than when co
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-04 02:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] lib2funcs.vis:1: Error: un
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
> 03:35 ---
> Sounds like libgcc/./lib2funcs.vis
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-04 02:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] lib2funcs.vis:1: Error: un
> > Sounds like libgcc/./lib2funcs.vis is wrong and should not have .hidden in
> > it.
>
> Yup:
>
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-04 03:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] lib2funcs.vis:1: Error: un
> Does -fvisibility=hidden work on hppa-hpux?
No.
With 3.4.3:
-bash-2.05b$ gcc -fvisibility=hidden -S main.c
cc1: error: unrecogni
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-05 03:48 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] basic block reorder
>What|Removed |Ad
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-05 21:55 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05
> 21:43 ---
> Was this before or after RTH app
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-05 22:01 ---
Subject: Re: testsuite_performance.h:63: error: redefini tion of 'struct
mallinfo'
> To wit, can you test the attached? Thanks.
I haven't had a chance to test your change bu
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-05 22:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function
Nathanael,
> Do you think we could canonicalize only when
> we compare a function pointer to a function pointer
> (rather
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-06 17:52 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] 8 tests fail: SIGSEGV for
> Most probably already fixed, but waiting for the confirmation.
>
> --
>What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-10 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE at cgraphunit.c:2907
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10
> 03:25 ---
> Do you see this any more?
No. Ple
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-10 04:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisf
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09
> 04:16 ---
> I think this was caused by:
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-11 21:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisf
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09
> 04:16 ---
> I think this was caused by:
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-12 22:02 ---
Subject: Re: Testsuite fails due to duplicate symbols
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17242
I have a fix in testing.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17242
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2004-12-13 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] missed jump opt
> Dave, does the current mainline fix the problem you are seeing?
> The mainline should propagate constants more aggressively
> and
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-22
16:18 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O0 (ICE)
> --- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-10-19 18:09 ---
> Well, I found that the TImode is g
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-31
03:45 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/unexpected1
cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
> I think these all are caused by bugs in binutils after the following patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-31
15:38 ---
Subject: Re: jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of
708630224 bytes
> > jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 708630224 bytes
> >
>
> sim
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-04
15:47 ---
Subject: Re: jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of
708630224 bytes
> > > jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 708630224 bytes
> > >
> >
&
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-04
15:53 ---
Subject: Re: s-osinte.adb:86:13: warning: function "To_Target_Priority" is not
referenced
> > ll s-osinte.adb
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dave dave 53 Nov 3 02:33 s-osinte.adb ->
> /home/dav
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-04
22:07 ---
Subject: Re: jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of
708630224 bytes
> Except that all of these were fixed in the followup patch and a later
> typo fix, *including* the memory usag
1201 - 1300 of 1352 matches
Mail list logo
