[Bug ipa/89330] IPA inliner touches released cgraph_edges

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89330 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug ipa/91302] tree-ssa-sccvn.c:7308:1: internal compiler error: in speculative_call_info, at cgraph.c:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91302 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Fixed by r273910.

[Bug ada/87100] FAIL: gnat.dg/config_pragma1.adb execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug c++/91335] False positive "unused variable" warning with variable initialized in 'if' condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91335 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Or add a conversion to bool that does the right thing?

[Bug target/91386] New: open-iscsi iscsiadm miscompiled by LTO on aarch64

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* This is the start of main from iscsiadm: 8fe0: d13003ffsub sp, sp, #0xc00 8fe4

[Bug target/91386] open-iscsi iscsiadm miscompiled by LTO on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91386 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 46681 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46681&action=edit Preprocessed sources with Makefile, part 1

[Bug target/91386] open-iscsi iscsiadm miscompiled by LTO on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91386 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 46682 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46682&action=edit Preprocessed sources with Makefile, part 2

[Bug target/91386] open-iscsi iscsiadm miscompiled by LTO on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91386 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 46683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46683&action=edit Preprocessed sources with Makefile, part 3

[Bug target/59230] __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 missing from libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59230 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 46808 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46808&action=edit Missing __divtf3@@GCC_4.4.0 on ia64

[Bug go/91764] [10 regression] libgo build broken with Solaris grep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91764 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- That should use grep -E and ERE.

[Bug driver/81358] libatomic not automatically linked with C11 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- See also bug 84568 and bug 86005.

[Bug target/91779] New: [9 regression] Unbalanced stack manipulation

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: i586-*-* Created attachment 46887 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46887&action=edit Preprocesse

[Bug target/91779] Unbalanced stack manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91779 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9 regression] Unbalanced |Unbalanced stack |sta

[Bug driver/81358] libatomic not automatically linked with C11 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- All these failure modes can already be observed on riscv-linux, where -pthread implies -latomic.

[Bug go/91781] [10 regression] r275691 breaks go test "reflect"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91781 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- For reflect to work there needs to be support for go closures in libffi.

[Bug target/91779] Unbalanced stack manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91779 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91779] Unbalanced stack manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91779 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46892|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/91779] Unbalanced stack manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91779 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91855] [8/9 Regression] OpenJDK Zero VM segfaults on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91855 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- SIGBUS probably means unaligned access. What is the executed code?

[Bug target/91970] arm: 64bit int to double conversion does not respect rounding mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91970 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Don't you need #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS?

[Bug go/91992] gcc/testsuite/go/index0-out.x SEGV and spinlock during testsuite run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91992 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- On aarch64, I see *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-ibm-aix*|powerpc-ibm-aix*, ia64-*-* --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab --- #c18 fixes the ICE on m68k which had the same problem as ia64.

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #27 from Andreas Schwab --- On ia64, even after applying all patches, there is still an ICE: configure:4279: /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/l

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #28 from Andreas Schwab --- Reduced testcase for #c27: int f1 (int); int f2 (int); int foo (int f) { return f1 (f) || f2 (f) != 0; }

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #36 from Andreas Schwab --- /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/local

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #41 from Andreas Schwab --- /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/local

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #42 from Andreas Schwab --- Reconfigured with --without-buildconfig: / -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-suse-linux/l

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #44 from Andreas Schwab --- Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort (file=0x43d15300 "../../gcc/haifa-sched.c", line=5465, function=0x43d164b8 "move_insn") at ../../gcc/diagnostic.c:1500 1500 internal_error ("in %s,

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #45 from Andreas Schwab --- Starting program: /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-gcc/cc1plus -quiet -nostdinc++ -I /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/ia64-suse-linux -I /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/prev-ia64-

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #51 from Andreas Schwab --- The try_ready ICE from #c45 is still present with the patch from #c47.

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #52 from Andreas Schwab --- In fact, both ICEs are still present, so #c47 isn't any better.

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #54 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, just the patch from #c47 on top of master.

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #56 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 42877 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42877&action=edit c-typeck.ii ./xg++ -B./ -fno-PIE -S -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-common

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #57 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 42878 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42878&action=edit c-warn.ii ./xg++ -B./ -fno-PIE -S -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-common c

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #71 from Andreas Schwab --- Bootstrap on ia64 with #c61 ended up with comparison failures. gcc/cp/name-lookup.o differs gcc/cp/parser.o differs gcc/bb-reorder.o differs gcc/build/genrecog.o differs gcc/gcov.o differs gcc/wide-int.o d

[Bug bootstrap/83396] [8 Regression] Bootstrap failures with Statement Frontiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396 --- Comment #73 from Andreas Schwab --- I was using --without-build-config.

[Bug target/83466] New: Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* $ cat tls.c __thread int ti; int f (void) { return ti; } $ gcc -S -fPIC tls.c -mabi=ilp32 adrpx0, :tlsdesc:ti ldr x1, [x0

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Pasted the wrong sample: adrpx0, :tlsdesc:ti ldr w1, [x0, #:tlsdesc_lo12:ti] add w0, w0, :tlsdesc_lo12:ti .tlsdesccallti blr x1 mrs x1

[Bug c/83539] [8 regression] several test case failures starting with r255947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83539 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/83547] [8 Regression] (statement-frontiers) error: void value not ignored as it ought to be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83547 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Note that POSIX requires such casts to work (for dlsym).

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- -pedantic is not designed to reject all programs that are not strictly conforming, but to enable emitting all _required_ diagnostics. I don't think a conversion between function and object pointer type req

[Bug c/83597] Compilation error reg multiple declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83597 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83632] New: pdt_26.f03:29:0: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* $ gcc/gfortran -Bgcc/ ../../gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg

[Bug target/83632] pdt_26.f03:29:0: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/83632] pdt_26.f03:29:0: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Nope, the bug is older, that was just when the test was added.

[Bug target/83466] Wrong TLS GD sequence for ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83466 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- This also fixes the original failure: miscompiled efl that causes python3-efl to fail to build.

[Bug c++/83710] Unsigned with Signed multiplication followed by right shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83710 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/67632] explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 83766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/83766] Bug 67632 not fixed yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83766 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/83909] Make doesn't report TCL errors in summary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83909 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Just because someone added a broken test should not break the whole testsuite run. It is more important to run as many tests as possible.

[Bug target/83632] pdt_26.f03:29:0: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andreas S

[Bug target/82964] gfortran.dg/class_array_1.f03 regression since r254388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82964 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/89264] Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89264 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 89265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/89265] Incorrect bitfield type in -Wconversion warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89265 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89269] RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89269] RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89269] RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89269] RISC-V stack variable as global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89269 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug go/89171] FAIL: go/build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- There are prebuilt images in that are set up to execute via qemu linux-user emulation.

[Bug c/89379] -Wformat is supposed not to give warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89379 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/89380] Multiple items in brace not working on nested macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89380 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- You can do dirty things with hiding the comma behind a macro, but don't do this at home, kids.

[Bug go/89171] FAIL: go/build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- How can I build and run a single libgo test?

[Bug go/89171] FAIL: go/build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|riscv64-*-* | --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --

[Bug go/89171] Wrong default for GOROOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89171 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: go/build |Wrong default for GOROOT --- Comment #6

[Bug target/89627] New: Miscompiled constructor call

Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: wilson at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: riscv64-*-* $ cat bind2nd.cc #include #include int main () { auto b = std::bind2nd (std

[Bug target/89627] Miscompiled constructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89627 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- FWIW this has been extracted from the swig testsuite. https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory:RISCV/swig/standard/riscv64 [ 3650s] ["/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/swig-3.0.12/Examp

[Bug target/89627] Miscompiled constructor call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89627 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Here are the test results with the patch: .

[Bug c/89716] Bogus warning -Wformat= in printf with __uint64_t argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89716 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Why do you think that __uint64_t is not long unsigned int?

[Bug c/89716] Bogus warning -Wformat= in printf with __uint64_t argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89716 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Why do you think that long unsigned int should be 32 bit?

[Bug lto/89896] -flto=4 is confused by presence of 'all.c' in a local directory. -flto=1 is not.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89896 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Just make the target .PHONY.

[Bug target/89954] missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Doesn't aarch64 always implicitly zero-extend when the dest is a 32-bit reg?

[Bug target/89955] riscv.h improperly defines STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89955 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- In which way is STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC interfering with sysroot? The sysroot is expected to use the standard layout, and the directories in STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC are prefixed with the sysroot before being us

[Bug bootstrap/89980] [9 Regression] bootstrap failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89980 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- It fails everywhere.

[Bug preprocessor/90034] gcc hangs on wait4 after vfork after opening tmp file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90034 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- You get the resolve part for free by opening it.

[Bug c/90081] stdint constant macros evaluating to wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90081 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/90110] [9 Regression] libgo fails to build against glibc 2.19

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90110 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- What is the condition i > 0x7fff for? Shouldn't that test val instead?

[Bug inline-asm/90181] Feature request: provide a way to explicitly select specific named registers in constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90181 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- x86 doesn't support this either. It just happens to have a few register classes that consist of a single register, but only because of ISA constraints.

[Bug c++/90205] Wformat-signedness detects %d and suggests %d fixit hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90205 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- %f is correct for double.

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Probably dup of bug 87281.

[Bug c++/87249] Undefined reference within a header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87249 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug testsuite/90318] New: Non-constant test names in libphobos.shared

: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org Target Milestone: --- Some tests in libphobos.shared include $srcdir in the test name (via the second argument of dg-runtest), causing unnecessary

[Bug fortran/90355] New: Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The second argument of gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc is not fully

[Bug middle-end/90435] gcc generate infinite loop code when using -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90435 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/88828] Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- ../../gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c: In function 'bool simplify_vector_constructor(gimple_stmt_iterator*)': ../../gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c:2107:14: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'tree_node* [2]'

[Bug c++/90617] GCC 9 miscompiles Qt4 "foreach" macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90617 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- According to [stmt.for] the expression is supposed to be evaluated in the scope of the inner loop.

[Bug middle-end/90713] New: [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc64-*-* Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --build

[Bug middle-end/91042] New: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:218

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: armv7l-*-* Created attachment 46538 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46538&action=edit Test case $ g++ -w -O2 -c skcms.ii during R

[Bug other/91085] New: fixincludes breaks

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-linux* fixincludes applies a bad change to from glibc 2.30. @@ -26,7 +35,7 @@ /* Use "" to work around incorrect macro expansion of the __has_include argument (GC

[Bug c/91092] Error on implicit function declarations by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- What about cmake, metaconfig, meson, scons, ...

[Bug other/87695] Arduino: ICE with avr and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- Since you know how to reproduce the issue, you can help by providing the requested information.

[Bug c++/86400] New: [8 regression] set::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86400 Bug ID: 86400 Summary: [8 regression] set::set #include #include void foo1 () { static char root[2] = {"/"}; std::set> d (&root, &root + 1); bool b = d.find ("/") != d.end (); assert (b); } void foo2 () { stati

[Bug bootstrap/78251] config/gettext.m4 and config/iconv.m4 contaminate CPPFLAGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78251 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- If configure tests are nested then that's a bug in the way the tests are written.

[Bug target/86340] GCC 8.1 produces broken code for m68k with optimization levels above -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86340 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug tree-optimization/86435] -fsemantic-interposition does not appear to have any effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86435 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- But the assembler is allowed to resolve the reference directly without the possibility for interposition.

[Bug c++/86482] arm vector instruction requiring allignment uses non alligned input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86482 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- If you have configured the compiler for the AAPCS ABI then the stack is required to be 64-bit aligned.

[Bug fortran/86566] The preprocessor cpp6 loses line concatenation on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86566 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86668] mixing ansi prototype with K&R definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86668 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80645] FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_3.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80645 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |m68k-*-*, ia64-*-*, |

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >