[Bug target/66428] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump original "_ZGVZ3foovE1x & 1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libstdc++/66438] libstdc++ 5.1 broke binary compat with old code using std::error_category

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66442] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors)

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: vries at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 65443 Target Milestone: --- Target: m68k-*-* $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/66442] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66442] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Fixes the test case on m68k.

[Bug testsuite/66497] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66497 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andreas S

[Bug target/66428] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/aarch64_guard1.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump original "_ZGVZ3foovE1x & 1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66428 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||singhai at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab --- > I don't really see why the trouble making the mental connection from the > void cast with the coder's intent do discard that result. Could it mean > anything else really? The C language doesn't define an

[Bug libgomp/66518] New: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-42.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 output pattern test, is , should match \[[0-9a-fA-FxX]+,256\] is

...@linux-m68k.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/lib-42.c -Bx86_64-linux/libgomp/ -Bx86_64-linux/libgomp/.libs -Ix86_64-linux/libgomp -I../gcc/include -I../gcc/libgomp -fopenacc

[Bug rtl-optimization/66351] [6 regression] r223883 miscompiles stage2 compiler on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66351 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Yes, it does.

[Bug c/29192] gcc will delete the c_source_file.c without any alarm!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29192 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yongjin.ohn at lge dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/66532] Source file deleted when we use gcc compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- If a and b are side-effect-free, pure-boolean expressions then `a && b' and `a & b' are completely equivalent and there is no reason to generate different code for them.

[Bug fortran/66534] Compilation error of gfortran building on YDL6.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] New: [6 regrssion] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: amker at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 62173 Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc64-*-* $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|[6 regrssion] FA

[Bug c++/66651] altivec.h + c++11 r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66651 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- stwx 10,8,9 -> *(int*)(r8+r9)=r10

[Bug tree-optimization/66739] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/subs.c scan-assembler subs\tw[0-9]

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/66739] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/subs.c scan-assembler subs\tw[0-9]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66739 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- fd425e6293fb8306af74b3048352d97e1d67b922 is the first bad commit git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@225249 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

[Bug tree-optimization/66739] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/subs.c scan-assembler subs\tw[0-9]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66739 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- This also breaks gcc.target/powerpc/405-nmacchw-2.c and gcc.target/powerpc/440-nmacchw-2.c.

[Bug tree-optimization/66767] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c execution test

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc-*-*, powerpc64-*-* $ gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/66767] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66767 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66739] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/subs.c scan-assembler subs\tw[0-9]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66739 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug target/66778] [6.0 Regression] PPC 405 and 440 nmac failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66778 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/66773] sign-compare warning for == and != are pretty useless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66773 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- It's always the boundary cases that matter most for security.

[Bug c/66773] sign-compare warning for == and != are pretty useless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66773 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- A cast is seldom a good solution, but even equality tests have the potential to go wrong with C's composite type rules.

[Bug rtl-optimization/66087] Invalid narrowing of MEM with containing POST_INC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66087 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- I think combine should reject this.

[Bug target/66840] [5/6 Regression] plugins fail to build on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66840 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Add it to TM_H.

[Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- On m68k: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46309.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests a_[0-9]*.D. -.1, 1. and -.3, 3.[\n\r]* into" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46309.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range te

[Bug fortran/66860] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66860 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Stack overflow?

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- > past a few statements Huh??

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- > (past a few statements) Huh? @@ -158,10 +158,6 @@ go_langhook_init_options_struct (struct gcc_options *opts) @@ -295,6 +291,11 @@ go_langhook_post_options (const char **pfilename

[Bug target/66885] trunk/gcc/config/mcore/mcore.c:1656: poor code order ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66885 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66926] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org, ysrumyan at gmail dot

[Bug tree-optimization/66926] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66926 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66926] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66926 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- See . The sources are available in .

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #44 from Andreas Schwab --- This breaks gcc.dg/pr43300.c on aarch64. $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43300.c ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43300.c: In function ‘foo’: ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43300.c:8:1: internal compiler

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #45 from Andreas Schwab --- It also breaks a lot of tests on m68k, eg: $ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr17957.c ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr17957.c: In function ‘vadd’: ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr17957.c:6:1: internal compi

[Bug testsuite/67203] New: [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times fre2 "free" 10

NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-* Broken

[Bug tree-optimization/67227] New: [6 regression] stage2 ada compiler miscompiled

: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 64164, 66978, 66983, 67000, 67034, 67035 Target Milestone: --- Target: ia64

[Bug target/67246] MIPS: lw (load word) is generated for byte bitfield, leading to unaligned access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67246 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67227] [6 regression] comparison failure in ada/par.o

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67227 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 regression] stage2 ada |[6 regression] comparison

[Bug tree-optimization/67284] [6 regression] libgo fails to build on trunk r227015 / *-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67284 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu, |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,

[Bug middle-end/67389] New: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-11.c (test for excess errors)

Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org Target Milestone: --- After r227207: FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-11.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: builtins-11.c:(.text+0x52): undefined reference to

[Bug tree-optimization/67390] New: [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr64312.C -O1 (test for excess errors)

: memory-hog Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 67283 Target Milestone

[Bug tree-optimization/67390] [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr64312.C -O1 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67390 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug testsuite/48238] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr47939-0.c scan-assembler on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48238 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2011-03-22 15:28:56 UTC --- You should avoid .* because that can result in multi-line matches. Use [^\n]* instead.

[Bug c++/48525] -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/48550] configure script help doesn't describe -enable-languages option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48550 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-11 10:00:11 UTC --- $ ./configure --help=recursive | grep enable-languages --enable-languages=LIST specify which front-ends to build

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-19 09:24:05 UTC --- What are the differences?

[Bug target/48690] gcc-4.3.5 fails for target m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690 --- Comment #30 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-22 20:38:45 UTC --- The real problem appears to be that netbsd-elf redefines STACK_BOUNDARY to 32, but leaves PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY at the default 16.

[Bug target/48690] gcc-4.3.5 fails for target m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690 --- Comment #31 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-22 21:40:00 UTC --- Also BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT is bigger than (PREFERRED_)STACK_BOUNDARY.

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwa

[Bug c/48758] gcc miscompiles Emacs by incorrectly substituting memcpy for memmove

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48758 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48793] Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dewar at gnat dot com Host

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-01 07:54:16 UTC --- That's not a problem because all pointer values are also returned in %d0 for compatibility.

[Bug target/48690] gcc-4.3.5 fails for target m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690 --- Comment #34 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 13:05:45 UTC --- Changeing BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT changes the ABI.

[Bug target/47955] gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c fails on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47955 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/42754] ICE on building libgcc.c __mulvdi3.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42754 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47672] math-68881.h does not support C99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47672 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 17:20:40 UTC --- I'd rather remove that file.

[Bug rtl-optimization/12871] ICE building gnat for native m68k-linux on i486-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12871 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/12089] m68k-coff-gcj segmentation fault on array initilisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12089 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/12871] ICE building gnat for native m68k-linux on i486-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12871 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-02 18:09:39 UTC --- But see also bug 48835

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-03 16:20:35 UTC --- 0 is a valid null pointer constant in C. If you want to use NULL as a sentinel you must always cast it.

[Bug ada/48942] [gcc-4.6.0] opt.adb compiled error while multilib enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48942 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-10 09:18:43 UTC --- *** Bug 48943 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ada/48942] [gcc-4.6.0] opt.adb compiled error while multilib enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48942 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/48943] [gcc-4.6.0] opt.adb compiled error while multilib enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48943 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48968] incorrect warning about longjmp/vfork clobbering a local (-W -O2, x86-64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-12 11:00:16 UTC --- That function doesn't actually call setjmp.

[Bug ada/49005] New: gnattools/Makefile hardcodes gnatmake/gnatbind/gnatlink

Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org When building a cross compiler with Ada enabled you usually need a native compiler of the same version. Toplevel allows overriding CC, GNATMAKE, GNATBIND, but gnattools/Makefile

[Bug rtl-optimization/49080] Wrong register allocation for even register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-20 16:01:04 UTC --- FWIW, the copy of longlong.h in glibc is slightly out of date, it lacks support for zarch, which uses a different definition of smul_ppmm.

[Bug web/49109] bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-22 17:45:27 UTC --- There should really be an option to disable the patch viewer, I find it completely useless.

[Bug target/40414] gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.0 Target Milestone|4.5.2

[Bug web/45811] New: bugzilla: editing search loses host/target/build

: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org Editing a search involving the host/target/build custom fields loses the search string in those fields. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/query.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDE

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2010-09-30 11:33:54 UTC --- -1 works for any integer type, ~0 only works for unsigned (int|short|char).

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/46005] Don't allow "auto" as the simple-type-specifier of a typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2010-10-13 15:12:13 UTC --- I'm getting 'error: ‘autot’ does not name a type' with both current trunk and 4.5. 4.4 gives "error: conflicting specifiers in declaration of ‘autot’" which is the better error messa

[Bug c++/46005] [C++0x] Don't allow "auto" as the simple-type-specifier of a typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Don't allow "auto" as the |[C++0x] Don't allow "auto"

[Bug c++/30745] Undefined static const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30745 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rarrum at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/46054] Linker cannot resolve a pointer to a static member of a class in an anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46054 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46054] Linker cannot resolve a pointer to a static member of a class in an anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46054 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46191] New: Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: ja...@redhat.com Target: powerpc*-*-linux*,powerpc*-*-gnu*,arm*-*-linux-*eabi,h ppa*-*-linux* The libgcc_s.so linker script (as used by targets using t-slibgcc-libgcc) contains non-absolute

[Bug target/46191] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2010-10-27 08:33:07 UTC --- The parts may not be installed in the same directory and relative names may break in the presence of symbolic links.

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2010-10-27 08:41:05 UTC --- The invalid address is generated by output_move_double.

[Bug target/46346] New: [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: meiss...@gcc.gnu.org Target: powerpc*-*-linux FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fma-1.c scan-assembler-times xvmadd 4 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fma-1.c scan-assembler-times xsmadd 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc

[Bug target/46353] New: [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: meiss...@gcc.gnu.org Target: powerpc*-*-linux FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fma-1.c scan-assembler-times xvmadd 4 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fma-1.c scan-assembler-times xsmadd 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc

[Bug target/46191] [4.5/4.6 regression] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/46395] New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc execution test

: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: r...@gcc.gnu.org Target: m68k-*-* Created attachment 22345 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi

[Bug rtl-optimization/46395] [4.6 regression] FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46395 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug driver/46410] [4.6 Regression] Linker options no longer accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46410 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2010-11-10 13:09:31 UTC --- > biosdevname:gcc: error: unrecognized option '-all-static' This is only a libtool option.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46395] [4.6 regression] FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46395 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2010-11-14 21:11:14 UTC --- That appears to be a bug in postreload in that it does not take exceptions into account. The change in rtl-opt/33721 just modifies the order how automatic variables are allocated and

[Bug rtl-optimization/46395] [4.6 regression] FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/pod/2.cc execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46395 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46460] warn for shifting more than the bits in the (promoted) type is undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46460 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lepinat at free dot fr --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c/46517] Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46517 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46672] Problem with fork and buffer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46672 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46766] Type 'void' is treated differently if used as return value or as parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46766 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46766] Type 'void' is treated differently if used as return value or as parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46766 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2010-12-02 17:10:15 UTC --- If you want the standard to be changed then this is the wrong place.

<    9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >