https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Did you mean ptrdiff_t?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68007
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20151024/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c:10:1: error: bogus
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_15.f03 -O0 execution test
At line 38 of file
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151028/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_15.f03
Fortran runtime error: Attempting to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
../../gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c: In function 'void
maybe_optimize_range_tests(gimple*)':
../../gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3193:8: error: 'operand_entry_t' was not declared
in this scope
operand_entry_t oe
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68265
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yaghmour.shafik at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68262
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68267
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Which target? This is probably BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT.
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: ia64-*-*
Both -O and -fno-split-wide-types are required to trigger the ICE.
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*, ia64-*-*
Started with r230098.
For example on aarch64:
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Did you set GREP_OPTIONS?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When building with --enable-checking=release:
../../gcc/gcc/cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68361
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68424
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68466
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68466
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68466
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Did you mean gcc-5.1.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: g++.dg/pr67876.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:23:8: error:
redefinition of 'struct S'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64470
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
It is using truncsiqi2, but that pattern hasn't been adjusted for coldfire.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The easiest fix is to disable the three trunc patterns for the coldfire.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64417
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The glibc sources never contained such an array of incomplete type. The
example in bug28865#c3 has nothing to do with glibc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64567
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
This transformation is incorrect if the lvalue may be pointing to a read-only
object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
According to http://golang.org/cmd/cgo/ cgo isn't supposed to be called
directly, but only via go tool cgo. But the version suffix will probably break
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why does libbacktrace need debug info? All required unwind information is
included in the binary. Glibc's backtrace can do that too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
But it shouldn't crash the app if you don't have the full information.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64681
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64703
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
A conversion between an integer type and a pointer type is
implementation-defined, not undefined.
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Created attachment 34520
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34520&action=edit
Testcase
>From the glibc testsuite.
$ gcc-4.9 -O2
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Created attachment 34519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34519&action=edit
Testcase
>From the glibc testsuite.
$ gcc-4.9 -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64714
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 64714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
The original test case is already using the equivalent of &a.buf1[4], without
any intermediate variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
How often does that occur in real life?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64800
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64808
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||friend1992friend1992@yandex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64862
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
glibc has this in :
extern int wprintf (const wchar_t *__restrict __format, ...)
/* __attribute__ ((__format__ (__wprintf__, 1, 2))) */;
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c -mcpu=power7
-O2 -S -m64 -o atomic-p7.s
$ grep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
c9f03f9b6e7a888a270638c07190513189f8c33d
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hjl at gcc dot gnu.org, rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -B gcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
This works as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
It doesn't bootstrap though:
ada/ali.o: In function `ali__alis__reallocate':
ali.adb:(.text+0x2170): relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against `.rodata'
ada/ali.o: In function `ali__units__reallocate':
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
before:
2170: 02 38 01 02 00 24 [MII] addl r39=0,r1
2170: GPREL22 .sdata+0x38
after:
2170: 02 38 01 02 00 24 [MII] addl r39=0,r1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
This has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab ---
I've accidentally tested with both patches applied, will try again with only
the first one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65064
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Schwab ---
The first patch works without regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg02066.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
It's a restriction of the selector expression parser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65160
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 65160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
It wasn't that way when reported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65268
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65267
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 65268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
lse
[-Werror=strict-overflow]
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63511
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is done by the linker, as part of the merge section handling.
Contents of section .rodata:
4005b0 01000200 78616263 00 xabc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63591
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
A function declaration with forward declared parameters it is a prototype, sort
of. Not defining the forward declared parameter as a real parameter should
probably be flagged as an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63647
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is only valid if the object is of the union type (union _GnmExpr)
(§6.5.2.3#6: "if the union object currently contains one of these structures").
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: ia64-*-*
Broken by r216728.
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr45752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Since C_INCLUDE_PATH defines the path for system headers, this doesn't look
like a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a reference
to abort.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc-*-*
$ ../../../gcc/gccgo -B../../../gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc64-linux/bin/
-B/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz,
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: ia64-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63760
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Why aren't read-only data being placed in progmem by default?
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: m68k-*-*
$ gcc/gfortran -Bgcc/ -Bm68k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
This also breaks g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C on powerpc -m32, but the patches in #c6
and #c8 don't fix that.
$ gcc/xg++ -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr63587-2.C -nostdinc++
-Ipowerpc64-linux/32/libstdc++-
rsion: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab ---
Also breaks gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c (both -m32 and -m64).
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c -O3
-fdump-tree-ldist-details -S -m32 -o ldist-19.s && grep -c "generated mems
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: rguenther at suse dot de
Target: powerpc*-*-*
$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: jakub at redhat dot com
Target: ia64-*-*
This fails at any opt level. Also failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
How about using strcspn?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
float f = 3.1f;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This looks bogus (from cxx_eval_binary_expression):
if (lhs == orig_lhs && rhs == orig_rhs)
return t;
Just because both operands are self-evaluating doesn't mean we can return the
unfolded expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63946
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
6 is the output from "cout << os.precision() << endl;", not the value of d.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
"No such file or directory" is a familiar, recognizable error message, and is
automatically translated through libc. Is the required complexity for this
special case really worth it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64126
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Host|hppa-unknown-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: mjambor at suse dot cz
Blocks: 63551
Target: m68k-*-*
Created attachment 34164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab ---
builtin-arith-overflow-14.c still fails on ppc32 as of r218249.
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ grep "global deletions =" pr44194-1.c.209r.dse1
dse: local deletions = 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc*-*-*
$ grep return ssa-dom-cse-2.c.183t.optimized
return sum_7;
1101 - 1200 of 1457 matches
Mail list logo
