https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 4 15:45:19 2016
New Revision: 233971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68187: fix overzealous -Wmisleading-indentation (comment #0)
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 4 15:50:27 2016
New Revision: 233972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68187: fix overzealous -Wmisleading-indentation (comment #1)
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70085
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks; I can reproduce this locally (e.g. building tree-complex.o in r233492
on gcc-5-branch using gcc 6 20160212); am investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #14 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 9 18:14:43 2016
New Revision: 234087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70105: Defer location expansion until diagnostic_show_locus
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 9 18:14:43 2016
New Revision: 234087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70105: Defer location expansion until diagnostic_show_locus
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 9 18:23:27 2016
New Revision: 234088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70105: prevent nonsensical underline spew for macro expansions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
--- Comment #15 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Mar 9 18:23:27 2016
New Revision: 234088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70105: prevent nonsensical underline spew for macro expansions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
From a discussion on IRC:
t.c:3:8: warning: ‘visbility’ attribute directive ignored [-Wattributes]
struct S *foo __attribute__ ((visbility
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70085
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 11 19:48:49 2016
New Revision: 234145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Wmisleading-indentation: add reproducer for PR c/70085
PR c/70085 repo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 11 19:48:49 2016
New Revision: 234145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Wmisleading-indentation: add reproducer for PR c/70085
PR c/70085 rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 11 19:54:43 2016
New Revision: 234146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Wmisleading-indentation.c: add more test cases for PR c/68187
gcc/tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 37972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37972&action=edit
Crude test case
In case it's helpful, here's a crude attempt at a black-box test case for this:
read a secret i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70264
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 17 18:27:47 2016
New Revision: 234303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70264: fix crash in compatible_locations_p with BUILTINS_LOCATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70264
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 17 18:27:47 2016
New Revision: 234303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70264: fix crash in compatible_locations_p with BUILTINS_LOCATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 18 17:45:42 2016
New Revision: 234340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70281: C FE: fix uninitialized range for __builtin_types_compatibl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Minimized reproducer:
$ cat bug.c
const char *bch_stats_show (unsigned long cache_hits)
{
return (__builtin_types_compatible_p (typeof (cache_hits >> 16), int)
? "%i\n" : "%i\n");
}
Am working o
||2016-03-17
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks. Confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70281
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01099.html
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
$ cat t.c
void foo (singed char e) {
}
C frontend, trunk:
$ ./xgcc -B. -c t.c
t.c:1:18: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘char’
void foo (singed char e) {
||2016-03-21
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Am working on a patch for next stage 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70339
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Mar 22 14:20:49 2016
New Revision: 234403
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234403&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69993: improvements to wording of -Wmisleading-indentation
gcc/c-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #18 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW Bernd posted a different patch for this, here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00598.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #31 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #30)
> I'm just using CPP_W_NONE in the patch I'm testing and that seems to work.
>
> Regarding the error message, here's what we'll get:
>
> 69650.c:4:55: warning:
||2016-04-28
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Updated patch kit posted as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01835.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon May 2 18:36:40 2016
New Revision: 235777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit
spe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon May 2 19:09:30 2016
New Revision: 235785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62314: C++: add fixit hint to misspelled member names
When we e
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
A user reported a false positive with -Wmisleading-indentation when
compiling "ed" with gcc 6.1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-05/msg00044.html
||2016-05-18
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2016-05-18
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
My bad; it
||2016-05-18
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed with trunk:
$ echo '__DATE__ __TIME__' | ./xgcc -B. -E -
# 1 ""
# 1 "&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01424.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01425.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu May 19 00:52:08 2016
New Revision: 236439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/69265: add hint for options with misspelled arguments
opts-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu May 19 18:10:30 2016
New Revision: 236483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71184: Fix NULL dereference in cp_parser_operator
The source-ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu May 19 18:56:47 2016
New Revision: 236485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71184: Fix NULL dereference in cp_parser_operator
The source-ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu May 19 20:29:07 2016
New Revision: 236488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71171: Fix uninitialized source_range in c_parser_postfix_expressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu May 19 20:33:51 2016
New Revision: 236489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71171: Fix uninitialized source_range in c_parser_postfix_expressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
:00 |2016-05-26
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed; I still see this with recent trunk (r236397 fwiw), with build = host
= x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
For reference, I get this output on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
underlying size_t: gcc long unsigned int, gccjit unknown
underlying uint32_t: gcc unsigned int, gccjit unsigned int
underlying uint64_t: gcc long unsi
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: rs6000-ibm-aix4.3, rs6000-ibm-aix5.1.0
The following two configurations in contrib/config-list.mk are failing for me
in trunk:
rs6000-ibm-aix4.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71375
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW, it worked for target=rs6000-ibm-aix{5.2.0|5.3.0|6.0}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Which target? (and host?)
FWIW before I committed it I successfully tested building gcc stage1 with the
patch using contrib/config-list.mk, with build=host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with
target= everything other
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
The failure was reported on IRC as being on AIX ppc; unknown for other ppc
configurations.
I successfully build and ran the selftests for stage1 on
build=host=target=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Reproduced on gcc111 (powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.3.0)
(gdb) bt
#0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_ (file=0x12557bbc
"../../src/gcc/selftest.c", line=44,
function=0x12557be0 "fail") at
../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:1281
#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks.
Sorry about the breakage.
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00703.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jun 9 17:27:12 2016
New Revision: 237271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/71471: remove selftest for pp_format (%p)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71471
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71481
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Sorry about the breakage.
As a workaround, the failing test can be disabled by commenting-out the call to
input_c_tests:
diff --git a/gcc/selftest-run-tests.c b/gcc/selftest-run-tests.c
index 934e700..c2fd7
gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
...
> Am investigating the best cross-platform way to open a named tempfile.
libiberty's "make_temp_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71481
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00755.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71481
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> this seems to fix it:
Thanks, and sorry for the breakage.
I wonder if it would be better to instead hardcode LANG=C in the Makefile.am
hooks that run the selft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71481
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Jun 13 21:20:10 2016
New Revision: 237414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237414&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/71481: fix input.c selftest
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71481
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #7)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> > Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00755.html
>
> BTW: this patch seems not to remo
||2017-07-27
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
I'm able to reproduce this on Linux by replacing:
#include
with:
namespace std
{
extern int sprintf (char *dst, const char *format, ...);
};
On Linux, the include of stdio.h seems to have bee
||2017-07-27
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed with trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01858.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Maybe all four (decimal, hex, formula, and constant):
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0xfffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exceeds maximum object size
9223372036
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Maybe could also make creative use of underscores in large hex values to make
things easier on the eye e.g.:
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0x___fffb, 1<<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd place
here:
bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka
0x___fffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Patch looks reasonable, and I can approve it.
CC me on it when you post it to gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Please can you turn it into a patch that contains both the fix *and* the new
testcase? (e.g. gcc.dg/pragma-diag-8.c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 18 18:12:47 2017
New Revision: 251186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: fix ordering of missing std #include suggestion (PR c++/81514)
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81514
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Aug 18 23:56:28 2017
New Revision: 251192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
jit: fix segfault with autovectorization (PR tree-optimization/46805)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
The entry with the NULL name comes from this line in sanitizer.def:
/* This has to come before all the sanitizer builtins. */
DEF_BUILTIN_STUB(BEGIN_SANITIZER_BUILTINS, (const char *)0)
There's also th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Sep 14 19:30:26 2017
New Revision: 252769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix crash accessing builtins in sanitizer.def and after (PR jit/82174)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Likewise, I tried but failed to reproduce it.
A hunch: given the "-march=native", is there a chance that this bug is
dependent on the precise CPU flags on the host?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
No idea. Looking at both trunk and the gcc 6 branch I see various options that
begin with "mavx512", but there isn't a plain "mavx512" option - they all have
some kind of additional suffix.
I don't think th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80016
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Apr 24 19:12:52 2017
New Revision: 247108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix location of sizeof/alignof (PR c++/80016)
PR c++/80016 reports an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80177
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Apr 25 13:34:50 2017
New Revision: 247233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix spelling suggestions for reserved words (PR c++/80177)
gcc/cp/Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80177
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79840
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri May 19 13:52:14 2017
New Revision: 248283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran: remove trailing exclamation mark from various diagnostics (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79840
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
||2017-06-02
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Testing a patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jun 2 17:07:37 2017
New Revision: 248841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix segfault in free_growth_caches (PR jit/80954)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00242.html
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Found by Alec Teal; reported to me over IRC.
Seen with gcc 4.8 and with trunk (r248825).
$ cat main.cc
namespace std {
template class initializer_list;
}
void WtfTest(int, const char*, const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81024
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE within |ICE within
|convert_li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
End-users aren't meant to see this; this is for people building GCC from
source, with checking enabled (the self-tests are a no-op in a release build).
So the "user" in question here is a developer, packager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Or maybe print something like:
BEGIN QUOTE
/home/jwakely/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/selftest.c:305: test_locate_file: FAIL: unable to
open file: ./example.txt
A gcc selftest has failed.
Investigation of the source l
1101 - 1200 of 3401 matches
Mail list logo
