https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121043
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #2)
> > However, I do see the following on gcc-15 pulled this morning.
>
> Can you check what branch you checked out? Be
Hi gcc-b...@sourceware.org
I’m Rohit Kumar from Techviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. We specialize in creating
modern, mobile-friendly websites that help businesses like yours build a strong
online presence.
Business Websites
E-commerce Websites
Landing Pages
Custom Web Solutions
Whether you nee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121060
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121072
--- Comment #1 from Edwin Lu ---
Found via fuzzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121073
Bug ID: 121073
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: ICE during RTL pass: avlprop
insn does not satisfy its constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||16.0
Last reconfirmed|
algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250714 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121075
Bug ID: 121075
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect
segmentation fault with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrks2023 at proton dot me
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121072
Bug ID: 121072
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: ICE verify_gimple failed
incompatible types in 'PHI' argument 0
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105793
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So this is not handled by
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-July/689515.html because we
don't handle PLUS_EXPR matching with MINUS_EXPR.
It should not be handle to expand to handle that case he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121064
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |xry111 at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120930
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
I'm seeing a difference between -O2 and -O3 where the -O2 version gets the
proper result (3). In the -O3 version we completely unroll the loop but don't
seem to populate the "b" array entirely but just the fir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121071
Bug ID: 121071
Summary: std::hash<__int128> and std::hash ignore
bits >= SIZE_WIDTH
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ABI
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110711
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.0, 14.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112961
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> The extra ssa name is due to PR 80342 .
And that was fixed with r16-189-g99aa410f5e0a72 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110015
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
The patch to fix the max reduction is at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-July/689515.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121062
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 61867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61867&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this combined patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4157d433df1ccc30ca2db2e4e9448318d730299f
commit r15-9969-g4157d433df1ccc30ca2db2e4e9448318d730299f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf6b07491e549af8ca9a27ac04f4d90c41d6a97c
commit r15-9972-gbf6b07491e549af8ca9a27ac04f4d90c41d6a97c
Author: Vineet Gupta
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7d4593d6932c3d16e3cdc837538403859edb52f
commit r15-9970-ge7d4593d6932c3d16e3cdc837538403859edb52f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The 4 patches in this space (two from me, two from Vineet) were backported to
the gcc-15 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121059
--- Comment #11 from Richard Sandiford ---
> if (masked_loop_p
> && code == BIT_AND_EXPR
> && VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (vectype))
> {
> if (loop_vinfo->scalar_cond_masked_set.contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
commit r15-9973-g0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120627
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
commit r15-9973-g0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120736
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
commit r15-9973-g0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120813
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
commit r15-9973-g0588de08620cbe7cbb545ced1e2c470e3a521481
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121062
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61860|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121015
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121015
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc07752af00f9e8ce3c9b25bf7dd4941a5df682d
commit r16-2233-gdc07752af00f9e8ce3c9b25bf7dd4941a5df682d
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon Jul 1
On 14/07/25 16:56 +0530, Akshaya Sankar wrote:
Hi all,
we would like to contribute to this open source community as a fresher /
less experience, and would like to know about the small contributions to be
done as initially. We have hands on experience on embedded, c, python and
c++. 4
You have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120297
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|wrong cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121064
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121067
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-fno-tree-slsr fixes the issue ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121064
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 61863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61863&action=edit
draft patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121064
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> I tried to reproduce the issue by mimicking what the test does, but I get:
Note that I've already commented out "check_optflags -fno-tree-vectorize"
before building ffm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121043
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10)
> Andre has sent a fixer patch for these. Building now and will test.
Does not work, disregard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121070
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or -fsanitize=undefined,bounds-strict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Summary|Unnecessar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61301
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71921
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #21)
> Trying 22 -> 27:
>22: r118:V4SF=r113:V4SF REG_EQUAL r113:V4SF27: r121:V4SF=~r118:V4SF&r113:V4SF
> REG_DEAD r118:V4SF
> REG_DEAD r113:V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120709
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e54a0c57c630c194ad260a53d9dc0e63b6aff607
commit r15-9977-ge54a0c57c630c194ad260a53d9dc0e63b6aff607
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120935
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-15
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71921
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be a dup of this one now since it was fixed in GCC 14.1.0 but broke
in GCC 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120996
Dhruv Chawla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71921
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
Trying 22 -> 27:
22: r118:V4SF=r113:V4SF
[(const float *)input_12(D) + ivtmp.21_83 * 1] ])
(const_vector:V4SF [
(const_double:SF 0.0 [0x0.0p+0]) repeated x4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120935
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
101 - 157 of 157 matches
Mail list logo