[Bug c++/119838] optional template keyword with global namespace causing error

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119838 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ca183c113effe2d334b2227f4fdfa5666db8874 commit r16-2146-g2ca183c113effe2d334b2227f4fdfa5666db8874 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/119838] optional template keyword with global namespace causing error

2025-07-09 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119838 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/121008] [16 Regression] Error on 'this' inside noexcept specifier of lambda capturing 'this' inside noexcept specifier

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121008 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:131ba6137bca263d7381ad3331840ee05e306fc9 commit r16-2147-g131ba6137bca263d7381ad3331840ee05e306fc9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/113563] Rejects capture of `this` in C++23 `this auto` lambda

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563 --- Comment #18 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:131ba6137bca263d7381ad3331840ee05e306fc9 commit r16-2147-g131ba6137bca263d7381ad3331840ee05e306fc9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: W

[Bug c++/120917] warning: use of 'auto' in template argument only available with '-fconcepts-ts'

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120917 --- Comment #28 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1c92ea10d30e4cf359faa8bbe3782ed6173d8a9 commit r16-2148-gd1c92ea10d30e4cf359faa8bbe3782ed6173d8a9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: W

[Bug c++/121012] [16 Regression] Error on lambda with auto parameter as template argument

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121012 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1c92ea10d30e4cf359faa8bbe3782ed6173d8a9 commit r16-2148-gd1c92ea10d30e4cf359faa8bbe3782ed6173d8a9 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

2025-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2492bab503f57f2cf6e08e5c104f7a1d31d34047 commit r16-2149-g2492bab503f57f2cf6e08e5c104f7a1d31d34047 Author: Jason Merrill Date: W

[Bug bootstrap/119430] profiledbootstrap fails on armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabhif (crashes in elists__append_elmt during stagefeedback)

2025-07-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119430 --- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva --- -mlong-calls isn't enough, because with !flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition arm_long_call_p overrides it to false when functions share the same section. But with -ffunction-sections I got all the gnat1 so

[Bug target/111814] [SH] __builtin_nan* returns signalling NaNs instead of quiet NaNs and vice versa

2025-07-09 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #11) > > Is there anything that needs to be addressed for this one? > > Yes, can this be backported to the 14 and

[Bug target/114641] sh: fdpic optimization of function address breaks pointer equality

2025-07-09 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114641 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/114641] sh: fdpic optimization of function address breaks pointer equality

2025-07-09 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114641 --- Comment #2 from Rich Felker --- The surrounding if statement whose body the hunk modifies is conditioned on TARGET_FDPIC, so it should not be able to alter non-FDPIC behavior.

[Bug bootstrap/119430] profiledbootstrap fails on armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabhif (crashes in elists__append_elmt during stagefeedback)

2025-07-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119430 --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 61826 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61826&action=edit candidate fix

[Bug target/114641] sh: fdpic optimization of function address breaks pointer equality

2025-07-09 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114641 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #2) > The surrounding if statement whose body the hunk modifies is conditioned on > TARGET_FDPIC, so it should not be able to alter non-FDPIC behavior. Ah, OK then. I just

[Bug c/121020] New: [16 regression] genrecog miscompiled

2025-07-09 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
-pie --enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1 --enable-linker-build-id --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib

[Bug tree-optimization/121020] [16 regression] genrecog miscompiled

2025-07-09 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121020 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/121020] [16 regression] genrecog miscompiled

2025-07-09 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121020 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61828 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61828&action=edit genrecog.ii.xz genrecog.o itself is miscompiled.

[Bug tree-optimization/121020] [16 regression] genrecog miscompiled

2025-07-09 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121020 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > Created attachment 61828 [details] > genrecog.ii.xz > > genrecog.o itself is miscompiled. $ g++ -std=c++14 -c -ggdb3 -o build/genrecog.o /tmp/genrecog.ii -O2 -fno-vect

[Bug tree-optimization/121020] [16 regression] genrecog miscompiled since r16-1624-g6deab186535a5a

2025-07-09 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121020 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/121021] New: Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall

2025-07-09 Thread asenzz at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 Bug ID: 121021 Summary: Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/117007] Poor optimization for small vector constants needed for vector shift/rotate/mask generation

2025-07-09 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/119876] suboptimal code for avx512 conditional move

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the difference between what I get with PR 119920 and what LLVM produces is due to the generation of `b[i] > 0 ? 1 : 2` for GCC; should we file this seperately? Jan where you did notice this?

[Bug c++/121021] Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-07-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/121021] Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 121021, which changed state. Bug 121021 Summary: Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 121021, which changed state. Bug 121021 Summary: Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/121021] Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug c++/121021] Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

2025-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 121021, which changed state. Bug 121021 Summary: Move -Wuninitialized from -Wextra to -Wall https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121021 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/121022] New: Suboptimal code generation for atomic_thread_fence

2025-07-09 Thread mmyangfl at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121022 Bug ID: 121022 Summary: Suboptimal code generation for atomic_thread_fence Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

<    1   2