https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #455 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61734&action=edit
Error log for building gcc-16 with LRA enabled, no patches
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04c597c05494e38cc9c231581737c1d7d7579e51
commit r16-1743-g04c597c05494e38cc9c231581737c1d7d7579e51
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a148b0377805376e33f36bed0e48a401a6dd82c6
commit r16-1740-ga148b0377805376e33f36bed0e48a401a6dd82c6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07832a5205389b4dc2b92fe58213386fe30ca618
commit r16-1744-g07832a5205389b4dc2b92fe58213386fe30ca618
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d06373fa3483a1ccb182c2da7e6cf2330f48bac1
commit r16-1745-gd06373fa3483a1ccb182c2da7e6cf2330f48bac1
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118209
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92417c387365033cac4fff7ec8da2b42bd75dfba
commit r16-1741-g92417c387365033cac4fff7ec8da2b42bd75dfba
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100795
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92417c387365033cac4fff7ec8da2b42bd75dfba
commit r16-1741-g92417c387365033cac4fff7ec8da2b42bd75dfba
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120837
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61737&action=edit
a-shell.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358
--- Comment #7 from Holger Hoffstätte ---
Sorry if the following is unhelpful - I'm just an interested observer.
Since I could easily reproduce the problem I decided to poke at things
in gdb and got a bit annoyed at the bad test code style. So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120837
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Self-contained testcase:
[[gnu::noipa]] void
bar (void **x, void **y)
{
x[0] = 0;
x[1] = 0;
x[2] = 0;
y[0] = 0;
y[1] = 0;
y[2] = 0;
y[3] = 0;
y[4] = 0;
}
[[gnu::noipa]] void *
foo (int x, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120784
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
index cdb838d8336..7899864158c 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc
@@ -457,7 +457,9 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120818
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Hi Lili,
> Thank you for reporting this issue and giving the actual output. I have
> relaxed
> the testcase check. Could you test this patch in your environment? Thank you
> very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120845
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
A new-line character ends the preprocessing directive even ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
--- Comment #7 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> Fixed for 15 / 14.3 / 13.4
But you didn't *optimize* the non-const begin, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120845
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C++ multiline module|[16 Regression] C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120840
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 61731
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61731&action=edit
A workaround patch
This workaround patch works for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120846
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I guess the testcase assumes that the qi->si case gets an intermediate
qi->hi promotion and then dotprod_hisi being used. But it fails to check
for the ability to do qi->hi promotion. Is that what your ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120846
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
vect_unpack would be required to perform qi->hi promotion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120845
Bug ID: 120845
Summary: C++20 module syntax
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> Looking at dumps between r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c and
> r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5, there's a lot of noise like:
> ```
> - # PT = nonlocal escaped null { D.387695 D.41
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120818
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> Hi Lili,
>
> > Thank you for reporting this issue and giving the actual output. I have
> > relaxed
> > the testcase check. Could you test this pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120818
--- Comment #4 from cuilili ---
Thank you all！
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120846
Bug ID: 120846
Summary: vect_dotprod_hisi is used inconsistently with
documentation and name in Test of autovectorization of
different dot-prod modes
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120845
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The more important is the
The last preprocessing token in the sequence is the first preprocessing token
within the sequence that is immediately followed by whitespace containing a
new-line character.
line be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120848
Bug ID: 120848
Summary: -fmodule-header -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header
dives into symbolic links
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de6124c9e5ed472f567b51fa76f18335cdddbbaf
commit r16-1732-gde6124c9e5ed472f567b51fa76f18335cdddbbaf
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Jun 27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug 56183 depends on bug 118591, which changed state.
Bug 118591 Summary: [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra in pr43879-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
Bug 113934 depends on bug 118591, which changed state.
Bug 118591 Summary: [lra][avr] Wrong code with -mlra in pr43879-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118591
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120040
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
I'll find some time to try make more progress. Will try adding a counter if I
cannot get further with reducing, but luckily, the C++ in the file isn't too
complex ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
This is the error I am seeing.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 12:38 AM vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs <
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843
>
> Bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113934
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Congratulations, and thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61735
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61735&action=edit
gcc16-pr120608.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #456 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #455)
> Created attachment 61734 [details]
> Error log for building gcc-16 with LRA enabled, no patches
>
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comme
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
