[Bug cobol/119337] cobol: gcobc wrapper should deduce output name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 Simon Sobisch changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/99000] [modules] merging of textual redefinitions: declaration std::__copy_move_a2 conflicts with import

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99000 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||furyusss at yahoo dot fr --- Comment #

[Bug c++/120764] redefinition errors when using certain std headers in GMF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120764 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 120764, which changed state. Bug 120764 Summary: redefinition errors when using certain std headers in GMF https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120764 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/120733] [16 Regression][aarch64] ICE in gen_highpart, at lra.cc:1484 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/86802] riscv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86802 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/86772] [meta-bug] tracking port status for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772 Bug 86772 depends on bug 86802, which changed state. Bug 86802 Summary: riscv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86802 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/120770] New: ICE: in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.cc:5454 with '-fcontracts'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120770 Bug ID: 120770 Summary: ICE: in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.cc:5454 with '-fcontracts' Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug cobol/119331] cobol: unimplemented exceptions abort compilation - even if requested to NOT use them

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119331 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- This issue keep up popping in each test run :-/ Current output of gcobc --debug -fno-ec=DATA-INCOMPATIBLE -fno-ec=PROGRAM-ARG-MISMATCH -fno-ec=PROGRAM-ARG-OMITTED warning: --debug implies -fstack-check:

[Bug cobol/120769] New: cobol frontend - provide a way to undo -ffixed-form / -ffree-form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120769 Bug ID: 120769 Summary: cobol frontend - provide a way to undo -ffixed-form / -ffree-form Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/120733] [16 Regression][aarch64] ICE in gen_highpart, at lra.cc:1484 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733 Robins Tharakan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tharakan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/120676] Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99000] [modules] merging of textual redefinitions: declaration std::__copy_move_a2 conflicts with import

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99000 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||admin at hexadigm dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 120676, which changed state. Bug 120676 Summary: Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/120676] Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 --- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead --- Ah, I see you actually already reported almost exactly this in PR114990 :) The message is still "hopefully will be fixed for the next major release" but I personally have very limited time for OSS things,

[Bug go/120774] New: GCC Go language version not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120774 Bug ID: 120774 Summary: GCC Go language version not documented Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug c++/120775] New: [C++26] P2996R13 - Reflection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120775 Bug ID: 120775 Summary: [C++26] P2996R13 - Reflection Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug middle-end/120721] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.7 on arm64 (instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.cc:1737)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8130a2ad91ca8571b099ba020443fadab7a688ca commit r16-1621-g8130a2ad91ca8571b099ba020443fadab7a688ca Author: Richard Sandiford D

[Bug target/120722] [16 Regression][gcn] ICE in gen_highpart, at emit-rtl.cc:1674 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca when building libgcc/strub.c for gfx1036

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/120729] Compilation takes forever with -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97044a47de533f2a9b3fc864e5ea318e53979079 commit r16-1622-g97044a47de533f2a9b3fc864e5ea318e53979079 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/120775] [C++26] P2996R13 - Reflection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120775 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/120771] New: CDF broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120771 Bug ID: 120771 Summary: CDF broken Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol Assignee: unassigned

[Bug libgcc/120726] make clean (clean-stage1-target-libgcc): Recursive variable 'AR' references itself (eventually). Stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/120777] New: [C++26] P3533R2 - constexpr virtual inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120777 Bug ID: 120777 Summary: [C++26] P3533R2 - constexpr virtual inheritance Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/120741] [16 Regression] ICE on mingw-w64-12.0.0: during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.cc:9446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/120778] New: [C++26] P2843R3 - Preprocessing is never undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120778 Bug ID: 120778 Summary: [C++26] P2843R3 - Preprocessing is never undefined Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libgcc/120726] make clean (clean-stage1-target-libgcc): Recursive variable 'AR' references itself (eventually). Stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120726 --- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов --- Created attachment 61683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61683&action=edit The full output of “make clean” - Recursive variable 'AR' references itself (eventually). Stop. The output

[Bug c++/120773] [C++26] P3618R0 - Allow attaching main to the global module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120773 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/120777] [C++26] P3533R2 - constexpr virtual inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120777 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/120776] New: [C++26] P1306R5 - Expansion statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120776 Bug ID: 120776 Summary: [C++26] P1306R5 - Expansion statements Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/120773] New: [C++26] P3618R0 - Allow attaching main to the global module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120773 Bug ID: 120773 Summary: [C++26] P3618R0 - Allow attaching main to the global module Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/120766] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault with duplicate extern variable of template type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/120721] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.7 on arm64 (instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn, at function.cc:1737)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/120751] [16 Regression] 10-15% slowdown of 454.calculix on Zen4 and Zen5 since r16-1001-g0291f53f8d2343

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120751 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-23 Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/120743] [16 regression] ice in verify_gimple_in_seq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120743 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/120747] [16 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares since r16-1550-g9244ea4bf55638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/120772] New: gcobc requires explicit -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120772 Bug ID: 120772 Summary: gcobc requires explicit -fPIC Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol As

[Bug cobol/120765] New: gcobc broken shellscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120765 Bug ID: 120765 Summary: gcobc broken shellscript Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol Assigne

[Bug c++/120766] New: ICE Segmentation fault with duplicate extern variable of template type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120766 Bug ID: 120766 Summary: ICE Segmentation fault with duplicate extern variable of template type Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug cobol/120767] New: cdf-includes: needs to work in any source format (use of floating comment indicators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120767 Bug ID: 120767 Summary: cdf-includes: needs to work in any source format (use of floating comment indicators Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug cobol/120768] New: cdf-includes: strange line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120768 Bug ID: 120768 Summary: cdf-includes: strange line numbers Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol

[Bug cobol/120769] cobol frontend - provide a way to undo -ffixed-form / -ffree-form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120769 --- Comment #1 from Simon Sobisch --- Note: the auto format seems to not work any more, after getting errors with * in col 7 I had to manually switch to use "gcobc -fixed".

[Bug target/120741] [16 Regression] ICE on mingw-w64-12.0.0: during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.cc:9446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120741 --- Comment #5 from cuilili --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to cuilili from comment #1) > > Created attachment 61678 [details] > > Fix-shrink-wrap-separate-ICE-for-mingw > > > > Hi Sergei, > > > > Thanks for reporting thi

[Bug tree-optimization/120781] builtin_object_size: affected by later builtin_dynamic_object_size calls?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120781 --- Comment #1 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- Looks like check_sizes is not inlined when you defined DYN? I haven't built the latest tree recently, but the only way I can get __bos to give me a valid value (i.e. without -DDYN) is by forcibly inlin

[Bug c++/120644] [modules] conflicting type for imported declaration with variable template and auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120644 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/120676] Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 --- Comment #3 from Larry Smith --- Thanks for the feedback. Will take a look into the "Textual merging of reachable GM entities" issue you mentioned. The https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990 bug you referred to however (that I po

[Bug target/120733] [16 Regression][aarch64] ICE in gen_highpart, at lra.cc:1484 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- Also seen in binutils while building gprofng (only with -g): ../../../gprofng/src/util.cc: In function ‘uint32_t get_cksum(const char*, char**)’: ../../../gprofng/src/util.cc:1562:1: internal compiler erro

[Bug tree-optimization/120781] builtin_object_size: affected by later builtin_dynamic_object_size calls?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120781 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/120779] New: HIGH-VALUE / LOW-VALUE not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120779 Bug ID: 120779 Summary: HIGH-VALUE / LOW-VALUE not found Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol

[Bug c++/120775] [C++26] P2996R13 - Reflection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120775 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/120775] [C++26] P2996R13 - Reflection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120775 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- WIP:

[Bug middle-end/120608] [15/16 regression] error: cannot tail-call: other reasons when using address sanitizer with musttail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa2e03effa5251a6f7c8b79a8e3be81c90fb5e4f commit r15-9855-gfa2e03effa5251a6f7c8b79a8e3be81c90fb5e4f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/120608] [15/16 regression] error: cannot tail-call: other reasons when using address sanitizer with musttail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5cf6027581770e97790f6495a56515ea4d0f7c2 commit r15-9854-ge5cf6027581770e97790f6495a56515ea4d0f7c2 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/120782] New: RISC-V: vector-strict-align not working for spec17 521 ref size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120782 Bug ID: 120782 Summary: RISC-V: vector-strict-align not working for spec17 521 ref size Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/120608] [15/16 regression] error: cannot tail-call: other reasons when using address sanitizer with musttail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/120776] [C++26] P1306R5 - Expansion statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug preprocessor/120778] [C++26] P2843R3 - Preprocessing is never undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120778 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61684|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/120780] New: Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 Bug ID: 120780 Summary: Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?) Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 61684 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61684&action=edit reduced testcase This is a reduced testcase (I've reduced the surrounding code, not the actual affected funct

[Bug c++/120676] Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 --- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead --- (In reply to Larry Smith from comment #3) > Thanks for the feedback. Will take a look into the "Textual merging of > reachable GM entities" issue you mentioned. The > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- We have, in .optimized: __write_overflow_field (-1, 0); always executed, unless kmemdup_noprof (...) == 0. At objsize time we have __p_size_field_121 = -1; ... [local count: 536073660]: if (__p

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 61686 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61686&action=edit full preprocessed source

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61686|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/120780] Missed __builtin_dynamic_object_size optimization(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120780 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Created attachment 61687 [details] > full preprocessed source > > Messed up, that missed the tail. It's also somewhat manually reduced, but > all structs hav

[Bug c++/120777] [C++26] P3533R2 - constexpr virtual inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120777 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61688 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61688&action=edit gcc16-pr120777-wip.patch Started playing with this and made some progess, but struct A { int a; constexpr

[Bug middle-end/120608] [15/16 regression] error: cannot tail-call: other reasons when using address sanitizer with musttail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a26f2ec55d20d524464c33b68b23328a7f6bbe commit r16-1626-g35a26f2ec55d20d524464c33b68b23328a7f6bbe Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/120608] [15/16 regression] error: cannot tail-call: other reasons when using address sanitizer with musttail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9523a935aaa28ffae9118e199a2f43a8a98e27e commit r16-1625-gb9523a935aaa28ffae9118e199a2f43a8a98e27e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/120676] Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules app)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676 --- Comment #5 from Larry Smith --- > I'm somewhat surprised actually that 114990 is working now, but in GCC15 we > fixed some issues with too much being emitted in the module CMI so that may > have hidden the issue. (Feel free to close the PR

[Bug bootstrap/120726] make clean (clean-stage1-target-libgcc): Recursive variable 'AR' references itself (eventually). Stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|libgcc

[Bug middle-end/71761] missing tailcall optimization (structure return)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71761 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687297.html

[Bug bootstrap/25790] make clean fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25790 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org --- Co

[Bug other/116792] RFE: should we be able to generate diagnostics in HTML format?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a64c96cfe7a4d5783319c2fb8472bc75d702e9a commit r16-1630-g5a64c96cfe7a4d5783319c2fb8472bc75d702e9a Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug other/116792] RFE: should we be able to generate diagnostics in HTML format?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2334d30cd8feac28831ffef857cd09753a3ca3d3 commit r16-1631-g2334d30cd8feac28831ffef857cd09753a3ca3d3 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug libstdc++/120789] New: ranges::unique should use ranges​::​iter_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120789 Bug ID: 120789 Summary: ranges::unique should use ranges​::​iter_move Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug fortran/120788] New: gfortran problem with integer overflow comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120788 Bug ID: 120788 Summary: gfortran problem with integer overflow comparison Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/109933] __atomic_test_and_set is broken for BIG ENDIAN riscv targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109933 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|120763 | Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/120788] gfortran problem with integer overflow comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120788 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug cobol/120790] New: parser bug: ORGANIZATION IS RECORD SEQUENTIAL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120790 Bug ID: 120790 Summary: parser bug: ORGANIZATION IS RECORD SEQUENTIAL Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: co

[Bug libstdc++/120789] ranges::unique should use ranges​::​iter_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120789 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- Same goes for ranges::remove_if: std::ranges::subrange r; auto [begin, end] = std::ranges::remove_if(r, [](auto&&) { return true; }); https://godbolt.org/z/Trb13x8fa

[Bug fortran/120788] gfortran problem with integer overflow comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120788 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/120791] New: FR: support for MOVEing pointer to pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120791 Bug ID: 120791 Summary: FR: support for MOVEing pointer to pointer Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol

[Bug debug/120739] ctf: Emit CTF_K_ARRAY for GNU vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120739 --- Comment #3 from Bruce McCulloch --- There is no spec for this behavior. After speaking with BPF maintainers at the BPF office hours, it was decided that emitting as an array type is appropriate for BTF as well as the upcoming CTFv4, with the

[Bug sarif-replay/120792] New: sarif-replay's sarif output doesn't faithfully round-trip all the data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120792 Bug ID: 120792 Summary: sarif-replay's sarif output doesn't faithfully round-trip all the data Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: SARI

[Bug target/118595] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: gfortran/c-interop test execution failures on RVV zvl > 128b since r15-3228-g771256bcb9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118595 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/119944] [16] RISC-V: g++.dg/torture/pr119610.C "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/120788] gfortran problem with integer overflow comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120788 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug cobol/120769] cobol frontend - provide a way to undo -ffixed-form / -ffree-form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120785] New: No compiler warning when wrapping a packed C-style array in a std::span, array memcpy instead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120785 Bug ID: 120785 Summary: No compiler warning when wrapping a packed C-style array in a std::span, array memcpy instead Product: gcc Version: 13.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/120786] New: strange message for NOT=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120786 Bug ID: 120786 Summary: strange message for NOT= Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol Assigne

[Bug fortran/120784] fortran: issue with use-association renames and interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120784 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 61694 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61694&action=edit Untested patch

[Bug cobol/120787] New: FR: EXHIBIT + EXHIBIT named support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120787 Bug ID: 120787 Summary: FR: EXHIBIT + EXHIBIT named support Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: cobol

[Bug target/119944] [16] RISC-V: g++.dg/torture/pr119610.C "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rzinsly at ventanamicro dot com --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/120795] New: [16 regression] ICE when building folly-2025.04.14.00 (df_refs_verify, at df-scan.cc:4029)

ost-pie --enable-host-bind-now --enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes --with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1 --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto bootstrap-cet' Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc v

[Bug target/104102] __builtin_frame_address(1) desn't work on riscv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104102 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/120795] [16 regression] ICE when building folly-2025.04.14.00 (df_refs_verify, at df-scan.cc:4029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120795 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug rtl-optimization/120795] [16 regression] ICE when building folly-2025.04.14.00 (df_refs_verify, at df-scan.cc:4029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120795 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61696 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61696&action=edit CPUThreadPoolExecutor.cpp.ii.xz

[Bug middle-end/120720] __builtin_rev_crc32_data8 (and family) should be able to constant fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120720 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- std::max has been constexpr since c++14.

[Bug rtl-optimization/120795] [16 regression] ICE when building folly-2025.04.14.00 (df_refs_verify, at df-scan.cc:4029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120795 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/120795] [16 regression] ICE when building folly-2025.04.14.00 (df_refs_verify, at df-scan.cc:4029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120795 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- (I'll submit the testcase once reduction is done, but that'll probably be tomorrow now.)

  1   2   >