https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #53 from hainque at adacore dot com ---
Thanks Dave!
We're still validating v18 in-house. Our biggest testsuite still shows
about 15 test failures, which
so far we believe should all be ok this still needs to be confirmed. Some
of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115893
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48c52af0cd85a2e702ff90c7ba6b70daf7f4b171
commit r16-1574-g48c52af0cd85a2e702ff90c7ba6b70daf7f4b171
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120711
Bug ID: 120711
Summary: Growing arrays segfaults when compiling with
-fcoarray=single
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120710
Bug ID: 120710
Summary: C23 enum member does not have during processing the
type indicated by C23 6.7.3.4:12
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120710
Pascal Cuoq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C23 enum member does not|C23 enum member does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120712
Bug ID: 120712
Summary: how to use __builtin_ia32_prefetchi
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103773
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c80062d7b8c272e2e193b8074a8440dbb4fe588
commit r16-1575-g4c80062d7b8c272e2e193b8074a8440dbb4fe588
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun May 25 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120709
Bug ID: 120709
Summary: ICE in expand_builtin_crc_table_based with
__builtin_crc8_data8
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rust|bootstrap
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов ---
> Which target is this on?
host == target
# uname -a
Linux d 5.10.226 #2 SMP Sat Oct 5 20:52:45 UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux
If this does not answer your question, clarify how to answer it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c80062d7b8c272e2e193b8074a8440dbb4fe588
commit r16-1575-g4c80062d7b8c272e2e193b8074a8440dbb4fe588
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun May 25 07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120713
Bug ID: 120713
Summary: length of SAVEd character arrays not statically
initialized
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120713
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120712
--- Comment #1 from Li Yinan ---
I has tried arguments: _MM_HINT_T0(3) and _MM_HINT_T1(2), but it still generate
that kind of warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e2eb9da5546b5e2fccb86586cda3beee8f69f5c9
commit r16-1572-ge2eb9da5546b5e2fccb86586cda3beee8f69f5c9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e570c3303ae36757aa5340ac60d562562052fc9
commit r15-9848-g5e570c3303ae36757aa5340ac60d562562052fc9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b89ee9e63ce7dff24dfab95f8df123e71629f5ff
commit r15-9847-gb89ee9e63ce7dff24dfab95f8df123e71629f5ff
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3cf9e55e394de211617333bbc3419c248d3e6b6
commit r14-11853-ge3cf9e55e394de211617333bbc3419c248d3e6b6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:153160c3f59c01ab864726abce66b4c3a0f2d909
commit r14-11852-g153160c3f59c01ab864726abce66b4c3a0f2d909
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120708
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120422
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
Bug ID: 120714
Summary: RISC-V: incorrect frame pointer CFA address for
stack-clash protection loops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
What happens if you don't build in the src tree as recommended in the install
documentation?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
--- Comment #5 from Дилян Палаузов ---
As far as I see both ./configure invocations above are identical.
> What happens if you don't build in the src tree as recommended in the install
> documentation?
I do not understand the question. How s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120715
Bug ID: 120715
Summary: FR: add COBOL2023 EDITING phrase to PICTURE clause
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120718
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Jeevitha from comment #6)
> The following dot_product function gets vectorized with the latest GCC trunk
> and gcc 15.1.0:
>
> #include
> #include
> extern float dot_product(const int16_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120716
Bug ID: 120716
Summary: ICE on https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#example-3 in
C++23
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
[I cannot read any of the attached code, but...]
The proposed manually vectorised code converts 64-bit integers to IEEE SP
floats,
which is extremely lossy. I don't find it very surprising the compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120718
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] ICE |[15/16 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120718
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||aarch64-sve
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120713
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95cc39dd47419d0544a0e1b32292ba250155a112
commit r16-1576-g95cc39dd47419d0544a0e1b32292ba250155a112
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119684
--- Comment #24 from Bruno Haible ---
On the gettext side, support for GCC 15 has been added:
https://gitweb.git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=commitdiff;h=82ddb5145579b9b4e834887139f439afadf7e47d
Note that there still is a problem,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Merzlyakov ---
Initial bugfix has been prepared locally and checked on simple test-cases. Once
it will pass internal tests for RISC-V, the patch to be submitted to the
mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120623
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonsobisch at gnu dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14dd61736fee45b2a83502bafa1c969a2610dd1c
commit r16-1577-g14dd61736fee45b2a83502bafa1c969a2610dd1c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #6 from Marc Adams ---
Another case is 8861 divided by 1:
#include
#include
int main() {
fesetround( FE_UPWARD );
_Decimal128 x1 = 8861, x2 = 1 ;
printf(" x1/x2 %f \n", (double)( x1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120718
Bug ID: 120718
Summary: [15/16 Regression] ICE (unrecognizable insn) with SVE
intrinsics and C++ class
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120717
Bug ID: 120717
Summary: Passing reference to incomplete type to
std::move_only_function emits false-positive
'-Wsfinae-incomplete' warning
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
--- Comment #6 from Jeevitha ---
The following dot_product function gets vectorized with the latest GCC trunk
and gcc 15.1.0:
#include
#include
extern float dot_product(const int16_t *v1, const int16_t *v2, size_t len);
float dot_product(cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||X86_64
Summary|Comparing sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120715
--- Comment #1 from Simon Sobisch ---
Note: the sample was mostly copied from the Annex D of COBOL2023, but I believe
that to be in error and the right version to be
EDITING CHARACTER L FOR NEGATIVE IS "("
EDITING CHARACTER F FOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120707
--- Comment #7 from Дилян Палаузов ---
I was using all the time out-of-source/VPATH builds, but typed here ./configure
for simplicity.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120632
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
please re-state the full set of used flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Is this fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120718
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] ICE |ICE (unrecognizable insn)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-19
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120634
--- Comment #1 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
This looks very much prime-paths.cc, and I think I have spotted at least one
problem:
diff --git a/gcc/prime-paths.cc b/gcc/prime-paths.cc
index 838343c8427..38feeea1522 100644
--- a/gcc/prime-paths.cc
++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120632
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
[tag] [reply] [−]descriptionktkac...@gcc.gnu.org 2025-03-18 08:54:08 UTC
Tamar and I have been discussing this offline but now that we have a reproducer
with all public sources here's a bug rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120709
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120720
Bug ID: 120720
Summary: __builtin_rev_crc32_data8 (and family) should be
constexpr functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
--- Comment #14 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
Linaro CI discovered [1] that commit
r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00caf7cfa8cac17b3fd1c33d658016 introduced a regression for
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pass.c -O3 -g (internal comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
K
sion algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250619 (experimental)
1f2e4058e57c68b5ea91ab2bac469d5e57b6ff46 (Gentoo 16.0. p, commit
263a417f98b248f43e449689d3e04bf7dced1569)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
> Is this fixed now?
Not yet: there's still
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687093.html (or
rather a follow-up by James).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120689
--- Comment #6 from Alex Mohr ---
Beauty! Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|[16 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120720
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You could always use the non builtin constexpr function to do the same for
constexpr part like is required for strlen, etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For debug insns, we generally want to be far more tolerant in what subregs they
accept.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE at -O{2,3} on |[16 regression] ICE at
|x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> My bet is on r16-1565, but bisection hasn't finished yet.
There's https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966#c14 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My bet is on r16-1565, but bisection hasn't finished yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, in this particular case it just seems like a backend bug, before that
commit it just emits weirdo
(insn 11 10 12 2 (set (reg:V2DI 109 [ _9 ])
(subreg:V2DI (reg/f:DI 65 ap) 0)) "scopex.ii":30:21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
Bug ID: 120722
Summary: [16 Regression][gcn] ICE in gen_highpart, at
emit-rtl.cc:1674 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca when
building libgcc/strub.c for gfx1036
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Hopefully it's C-isable:
```
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr int value = __v;
};
template using __bool_constant = integral_constant<__v>;
template using enable_if_t = int;
struct functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
aarch64_expand_vector_init_fallback seems to be creating a V2DImode subreg from
DImode 24626 rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0,
maxelement));
24627 aarch64_emit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |16.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120719
Bug ID: 120719
Summary: __builtin_rev_crc32_data8() should revert to
__builtin_ia32_crc32qi() when available
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
Definitely something amok. in dom3 I'm seeing:
range_of_expr(_131) at stmt _134 = _131 * -1101344938;
TRUE : (3439) range_of_expr (_131) [irange] int [-1494798553,
-5][-1, -1][3, 652685091][
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120723
Bug ID: 120723
Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression][OpenACC] '!$acc ...
attach(scalar)' – ICE 'unexpected pointer mapping
node'
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
99 matches
Mail list logo