https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120485
Bug ID: 120485
Summary: Superfluous branch coverage and condition coverage
before preprocessor directives
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120486
Bug ID: 120486
Summary: Line coverage for nested ternary expressions counts
overlapping paths
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120475
Daniel Bertalan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120476
--- Comment #1 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #0)
> Per
> https://github.com/loongson-community/discussions/issues/94#issuecomment-
> 2919912764:
>
> Spec int 2017 rate-1 with GCC 15.1.0 on 3C6000:
>
> -O3 -march=la464:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120477
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
r13-707-g68e0063397ba82 was when COND_EXPR no longer could have a conditional
in rhs1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I think we should revert the patch for PR99015 I committed yesterday. There
were to many changes in this part of LRA since gcc-13 and many of them were
interdependent. It will be difficult to find all n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceb2d19235478213219bb722cf4248a1ac78b73c
commit r13-9729-gceb2d19235478213219bb722cf4248a1ac78b73c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120357
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
The following fixes this. I'm not 100% convinced but it does seem "obvious"
(but for the "peeled" case we seem to eventually create duplicate COND
reduction IVs? But possibly we reject this case anyhow).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:004523c9530f94ae3d64d4c9967ff90388bc
commit r14-11818-g004523c9530f94ae3d64d4c9967ff90388bc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c13d5b939fee565047394475952878dc5394fb74
commit r16-1005-gc13d5b939fee565047394475952878dc5394fb74
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 61553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61553&action=edit
Reduced C test case
Here is a reduced C test case:
struct data
{
int a;
int b;
};
unsigned char v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -Os on|[15/16 Regression] wrong
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental) (GCC)
[515] %
[515] % gcctk -Os small.c
[516] % ./a.out
Aborted
[517] %
[517] % cat small.c
int printf(const char
-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental) (GCC)
[525] %
[525] % gcctk -O1 small.c
[526] % ./a.out
Aborted
[527] % cat small.c
int a, ac, b, c;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120490
Bug ID: 120490
Summary: Wrong line coverage for inline function as an arm of
switch-case
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #24 from Steven Munroe ---
It looks like GCC 12/13 are handling this better (not generating vector store
reload). I I'll check into GCC 14 went i get a chance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120489
Bug ID: 120489
Summary: Wrong line coverage in loops with continue statements
and dereferencing of pointer variables
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120491
Bug ID: 120491
Summary: Wrong line coverage for C++ constructor with multiline
initialization list
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d10e3e0900c92479a6621e375070d4a99ca1fd57
commit r16-1023-gd10e3e0900c92479a6621e375070d4a99ca1fd57
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119856
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 61556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61556&action=edit
Patch to correct runtime behavior of repeated use of the same format
This patch corrects a latent problem. ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e131ba3de5f487f5e957ba1b011c960fce557c7b
commit r16-1026-ge131ba3de5f487f5e957ba1b011c960fce557c7b
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
_5 = a.1_2 * -2147483647;
_6 = b.0_1 + _5;
vs:
_3 = b.0_1 + a.1_2;
slsr_10 = a.1_2 * -2147483648;
_6 = _3 - slsr_10;
Obvious this introduces an signed integer overflow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86693
Petr Skocik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pskocik at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 119773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8e7a2dbe736a57e4cec0293387a1c558b5a155e
commit r15-9748-gd8e7a2dbe736a57e4cec0293387a1c558b5a155e
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a746747e2102c965a7736dc22ba56c3bc8e3e61e
commit r16-1024-ga746747e2102c965a7736dc22ba56c3bc8e3e61e
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120493
Bug ID: 120493
Summary: 2 different functions to get call RTX from CALL_INSN
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494
Bug ID: 120494
Summary: get_call_fndecl requires REG_CALL_DECL note
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 119780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Jonatha
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo