https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
Bug ID: 120481
Summary: Incorrect format result for using specifier with
multi-digit month, day or weekday
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
For weekday, we could also consider printing !ok() values unmodified. They
always will be greater than 7, so there is no confusion in the output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e77309047a7b479c89f03dcaf2994e050d0f33e
commit r16-1003-g0e77309047a7b479c89f03dcaf2994e050d0f33e
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] Type |[15 Regression] Type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Summary|[15/16 Regregr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120341
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02c58bc4b0885f5b6f50033da35768ebe6c4a030
commit r16-1012-g02c58bc4b0885f5b6f50033da35768ebe6c4a030
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120357
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> The following fixes this. I'm not 100% convinced but it does seem "obvious"
> (but for the "peeled" case we seem to eventually create duplicate COND
> reduct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 104928, which changed state.
Bug 104928 Summary: std::counting_semaphore on Linux can sleep forever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
What|Removed |Added
--
inition -version -fbuilding-libgcc
-fno-stack-protector -fPIC -o decNumber.s
GNU C17 (SUSE Linux) version 13.3.1 20250530 [revision
03ae1212a94a8800f0dbc6a3df9bf557a93c63b8] (s390x-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 14.3.0, GMP version 6.3.0, MPFR version
4.2.2, MPC version 1.3.1, isl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's caused by r13-9726-gaf73c8bf516884
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
>
> > So what about just marking inline asms with memory clobber as having side
> > effects?
> I guess this would wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120478
--- Comment #1 from Wentao Zhang ---
Another reduced input from lzo2:
__inline__ __attribute__((__always_inline__))
int foo(int x) { return 0; }
int main(void) {
int a = 0, b = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 42; i++) {
foo(a+1) + foo(1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #4 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 61551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61551&action=edit
Improved proposed fix
This patch type checks lvalues within the becomes op. It also rewrites and
tidies up the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Later in the compilation pipeline, DCE removes insns 6 and 8 as dead code,
> leaving:
>
> _.c.331r.cmpelim:
>
>10: {x1:SI=asm_operands;clobber [scratch];}
>12: {x3:SI=asm_operands;clobber [scrat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You mean before 15.2? I guess I could.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f37c5f1d88c9da17f16cdb33e7c9d43e4bb5f64d
commit r16-1017-gf37c5f1d88c9da17f16cdb33e7c9d43e4bb5f64d
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Wed May 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70418e6c0120cfce33ab69628602dfdadbed683a
commit r16-1018-g70418e6c0120cfce33ab69628602dfdadbed683a
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Thu May 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120347
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e322dff09d011f65f5cae4e95c3a24ccfae7b1e1
commit r16-984-ge322dff09d011f65f5cae4e95c3a24ccfae7b1e1
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120479
Bug ID: 120479
Summary: missed opportunity to generate czero.nez
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120459
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98749
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
commit r16-997-gef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118395
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
commit r16-997-gef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118494
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
commit r16-999-g3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
commit r16-999-g3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98749
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
commit r16-999-g3e9fff1b7f9a31e6bc635880b09cbc32f8be353d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 110854, which changed state.
Bug 110854 Summary: constructor of std::counting_semaphore is not constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108974
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
commit r16-997-gef632273a90657acb45e89df12bce9e96035f52c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> So what about just marking inline asms with memory clobber as having side
> effects?
I guess this would work, the compiler must preserve side effects when
optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 118494, which changed state.
Bug 118494 Summary: std::counting_semaphore should work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118494
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression] |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118395
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118494
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108974
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std::barrier accepts|[DR 3898] std::barrier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 118395, which changed state.
Bug 118395 Summary: Constructor of std::barrier is not constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118395
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115955
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Yes, this is a known limitation that will get fixed with the planned
> refactoring of atomic::wait.
The function that maps an address to a mutex has been mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120457
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0291f53f8d2343ca0d39589ebffc31d9c328d6ab
commit r16-1001-g0291f53f8d2343ca0d39589ebffc31d9c328d6ab
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #14 from Richard Sandiford ---
ISTM that the problem is that cselib doesn't consider:
(clobber (mem:BLK (scratch)))
to be a read from memory (unlike note_uses, which gets this right). cselib
instead assumes that the SET_SRC of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Bug ID: 120480
Summary: ICE: could not split insn
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Is it really invalid to perform CSE on val though?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120477
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120477
Bug ID: 120477
Summary: arith_overflow_check_p has a special case for
COND_EXPR but it is dead
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: interna
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #10)
> Is it really invalid to perform CSE on val though?
Later in the compilation pipeline, DCE removes insns 6 and 8 as dead code,
leaving:
_.c.331r.cmpelim:
10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120478
Bug ID: 120478
Summary: Line coverage gets multiplied by a factor when
invoking inline functions
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
typedef struct {
int digits;
int emax;
int emin
} decContext;
decContext decSetSubnormal_set;
decSetSubnormal() { decContext worksetworkset = decSetSubnormal_set; }
is a reduced testcase that fails w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #15)
> FTR, clobbers are already marked as having side effects:
Oops, I got the logic wrong. Please disregard this comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Picking 22fe83d6fc9f59311241c981bcad58b61e2056d4 fixes the preprocessed source,
I'm checking whether the cross build succeeds then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 104928, which changed state.
Bug 104928 Summary: std::counting_semaphore on Linux can sleep forever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> You mean before 15.2? I guess I could.
Yes, before 15.2 :-)
Please do, it would be appreciated to have better debugging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 119298, which changed state.
Bug 119298 Summary: [15/16 Regression] 538.imagick_r is faster when compiled
with GCC 14.2 and -Ofast -flto -march=native than with master on Zen5 since
r15-3441-g4292297a0f938f
https://gcc.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:611d59589d8c48db051b31e727d7f52910a4cbcd
commit r16-1019-g611d59589d8c48db051b31e727d7f52910a4cbcd
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114022
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
commit r16-1020-g490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
commit r16-1020-g490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e591109238fad430e94ae58f8f90b4bc9c8592a3
commit r12-8-ge591109238fad430e94ae58f8f90b4bc9c8592a3
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120463
--- Comment #1 from Dubois ---
Created attachment 61555
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61555&action=edit
Files necessary to reproduce the bug : sources code, obj, ali etc.., gpr & data
files.
No more comment.. You've [Gnat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61549|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #14)
> Created attachment 61550 [details]
> pr113563 testcase
>
> I'd briefly started looking at this a while back and had written some tests,
> but I'd gotten stu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Joh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114022
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
--- Comment #39 from Alexander Monakov ---
> I don't think we need any mass rebuilds there, I'm fine with approving
> a change of the default now. The question is what to do for languages
> other than C/C++, that complication might be a reason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119240
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e0f963bcfbfce351dd4aad82e6dbc6fc84a0724
commit r16-982-g0e0f963bcfbfce351dd4aad82e6dbc6fc84a0724
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15/16 Regression] |[14/15 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
Similar issue appears also for using '%w' and '%u' on the weekday that contains
a 2 or 3 digit number:
```
std::cout << std::format("{:%w}", weekday(120)) << std::endl; // prints 8
std::cout << std::format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120482
Bug ID: 120482
Summary: Line coverage for inline functions combine its
different callers in inconsistent ways
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4def864a27c41025bbed0d086fa4628921fec28
commit r14-11819-gf4def864a27c41025bbed0d086fa4628921fec28
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119835
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:543f7e1d59f0b6628e0de6610ad5e1cf7150090b
commit r16-1006-g543f7e1d59f0b6628e0de6610ad5e1cf7150090b
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fa1f93eb7e39ccabf39a45e89f1a35adcf1bf1f
commit r15-9744-g9fa1f93eb7e39ccabf39a45e89f1a35adcf1bf1f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2025-05-27 00:00:00 |2025-5-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec78a0d9962f144b13c6da3ebec1f76c61a701d5
commit r13-9730-gec78a0d9962f144b13c6da3ebec1f76c61a701d5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120459
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Before sched2:
(insn 2301 536 2302 9 (set (reg:DI 10 a0 [2652])
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 2 sp)
(const_int 2047 [0x7ff]))) "addi.cc":99:73 5 {adddi3}
(nil))
(insn 2302 2301 1693 9 (set (r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120180
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b368dd5de53fc981b5b20e2fd6d7de9116e82331
commit r15-9745-gb368dd5de53fc981b5b20e2fd6d7de9116e82331
Author: Sandra Loose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118903
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118903
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120484
Bug ID: 120484
Summary: Wrong line coverage triggered by loop, else-clause,
and variable declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
--- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2025-05-29 3:41 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
>
> --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> I suppose another way to resolve thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
Confirmed.
Also this code provokes the bug:
$ cat testxindr2.mod
MODULE testxindr2 ; (*!m2iso+gm2*)
CONST
NulName = 0 ;
TYPE
Name = CARDINAL ;
PROCEDURE set (VAR n: Name) ;
BEGIN
n := NulName
EN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
I could be mistaken, but VNx4QI is a partial vector, so every QI element
occupies 32-bits (so we'd use a widening load here).
I'm not sure this operation is valid for partial vectors as it means you're
ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
When compiled with gm2 after the patch above has been applied, we get a clean
compile.
$ gm2 -c testxindr2.mod
$ echo $?
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483
Bug ID: 120483
Summary: character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns
incorrect substring
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
