[Bug c++/120385] [14/15/16 Regression] Regression] GCC 14 incorrectly accepts array prvalues with certain operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120385 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Regression] GCC 14 |[14/15/16 Regression]

[Bug c/120380] New: internal compiler error: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380 Bug ID: 120380 Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines re-entered Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/119600] HOST_WIDEST_FAST_INT should be used instead of long for BITMAP_WORD in bitmap.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119600 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/120368] [16 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-forward-propagate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120368 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug cobol/119256] Capture source ranges for tokens in gcobol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119256 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- a slightly modified testcase (without the lambda, so the dumps are easier to read) #include struct coro { struct promise_type { promise_type() = default; std::suspend_never initial_sus

[Bug c/120381] [14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381 --- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers --- Nesting one definition of struct A inside another is never valid (and the godbolt link shows the expected "nested redefinition" error that the PR doesn't quote).

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/120384] New: [12/13/14/15/16] _BinaryPredicateConcept checks in std::unique_copy are wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120384 Bug ID: 120384 Summary: [12/13/14/15/16] _BinaryPredicateConcept checks in std::unique_copy are wrong Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/120384] [12/13/14/15/16] _BinaryPredicateConcept checks in std::unique_copy are wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120384 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/120381] New: internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381 Bug ID: 120381 Summary: internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:848 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c/120381] internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/120381] [14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:848

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120381 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[14/15/16 Regression]

[Bug c/120382] ICE with hardbool attribute and undeclared variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120382 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/120380] [14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120380 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.3.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug cobol/119336] cobol: missing copybooks break parser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119336 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/120385] [14/15/16 Regression] GCC 14 incorrectly accepts array prvalues with certain operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120385 --- Comment #2 from Language Lawyer --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Is this still valid? > ``` > int main() > { > using IA = int[]; > using IP = int*; > void(+IP{IA{ 1, 2, 3 }}); > } > ``` Prolly, the wording is (was) a

<    1   2