https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118245
--- Comment #12 from Nathaniel Shead ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> (In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #10)
> > This is fixed for GCC 15. Unfortunately this patch isn't appropriate for
> > backporting as it will caus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119246
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 119246, which changed state.
Bug 119246 Summary: Result basic_format_arg::check_dynamic_spec is incorrect
for extended floating point types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119246
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111814
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo ---
Is there anything that needs to be addressed for this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d039eff453f777c58642ff16178c1ce2a4be6ab
commit r16-614-g9d039eff453f777c58642ff16178c1ce2a4be6ab
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120276
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jschmitz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120125, which changed state.
Bug 120125 Summary: [15/16 Regression] ICE in add_to_same_comdat_group when
using -Os or -fdeclone-ctor-dtor since r15-521-g6ad7ca1bb90573
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|15.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120276
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118775
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97121b135530b15bc7d1b9e24daa566d9b0473b0
commit r14-11776-g97121b135530b15bc7d1b9e24daa566d9b0473b0
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119303
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ce96b683a40a12299c1d0e02727e747c00ad883
commit r14-11777-g9ce96b683a40a12299c1d0e02727e747c00ad883
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116960
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ce96b683a40a12299c1d0e02727e747c00ad883
commit r14-11777-g9ce96b683a40a12299c1d0e02727e747c00ad883
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117778
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52202e42919d0d95c13889bed9e69b954e4376af
commit r14-11778-g52202e42919d0d95c13889bed9e69b954e4376af
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117778
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117501
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 117501, which changed state.
Bug 117501 Summary: [14 Regression] Consteval constructor does not initialize
the variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117501
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116379
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c11cb308c1e2aae427d6f32a1144ae8907dc2649
commit r14-11780-gc11cb308c1e2aae427d6f32a1144ae8907dc2649
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120283
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||93006
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120279
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I'm not sure what you are after? That in f1() the earlier of both shifts can
be removed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120280
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61427
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61427&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120285
Bug ID: 120285
Summary: ice in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.cc:1397
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120283
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I think this specific case is overly restrictive - it was likely added for some
loop IV test related regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Huiba Li from comment #3)
> > Note the 0 there rather than r. r in the input means any register while 0
> > means it needs to match the same register as the 0th operand which in this
> > case is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
--- Comment #3 from 鲁七 ---
> Note the 0 there rather than r. r in the input means any register while 0
> means it needs to match the same register as the 0th operand which in this
> case is the output operand.
Thanks for your quick response. Us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
--- Comment #5 from Huiba Li ---
> Marking x as an output without tieing it to another register will have
> garbage in the variable after the inline-asm. That is explicitly mentioned.
Oh, I see.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108630
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119439
Bug 119439 depends on bug 117287, which changed state.
Bug 117287 Summary: [13 Regression] assume attribute related miscompilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117287
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120280
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 79485f9678a..7b2cad9d605 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -2598,6 +2598,15 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
)
)
+/* Convert ABS_EX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
Bug ID: 120284
Summary: inline assembly operand constraint not comply with
document
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The documentation is clear there too:
>From the page you linked:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Output-Operands
"When using ‘=’, do not assume the location contains the existing value
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo