https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #22 from Levi Zim ---
This no longer reproduces for gcc 15.1.1+r7+gf36ec88aa85a.
I am not sure if the underlying bug is solved or the trigger no longer
triggers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120171
Bug ID: 120171
Summary: Consider using custom glibc locales for testing
std::locale facets
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Note with "vectorizing" prefetches I meant adjusting the prefetched address,
"vectorizing" it as an induction but only prefetching on the first (or last?)
address of the vector induction vector. Aka simply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug 120170 depends on bug 96322, which changed state.
Bug 96322 Summary: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/3.cc is outdated: expects
grouping=0, actual=3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96322
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120171
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
commit r16-471-g66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Note with "vectorizing" prefetches I meant adjusting the prefetched address,
> "vectorizing" it as an induction but only prefetching on the first (or
> last?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ca51bd433869037061bb72d5b6872e423856189
commit r15-9640-g0ca51bd433869037061bb72d5b6872e423856189
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
commit r16-471-g66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
commit r15-9642-g7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64846
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
commit r16-471-g66f5f03853035cc917627e7d044bff8ccd9eca3f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116047
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
commit r15-9638-gbfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4fd651d23b007fc9cd93a9300afab21d6dec2ee
commit r15-9641-gd4fd651d23b007fc9cd93a9300afab21d6dec2ee
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
commit r15-9638-gbfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
commit r15-9638-gbfcb5da69a41f7a5e41faab39b763d9d7c8bd2ea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug 120170 depends on bug 64846, which changed state.
Bug 64846 Summary: FAIL: 22_locale/conversions/string/2.cc execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64846
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #5)
> The given example is an easy one to drop, but I wonder what would happen if
> the block had other instructions too
>
> void foo(double * restrict a, double *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d19251042f14fe84a5edc82b1a2b49ace6da6a1
commit r15-9639-g9d19251042f14fe84a5edc82b1a2b49ace6da6a1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
commit r15-9642-g7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug 120170 depends on bug 112351, which changed state.
Bug 112351 Summary: libstdc++ locale init doesn't handle __gthread_once failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Richi, do you plan to backport this to gcc-13 and maybe gcc-12? Or should we
> close it?
I have been patching our gcc13 for this for quite some time so let m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1df8fffba30bf4022dda762bf61acf16ac704c67
commit r16-469-g1df8fffba30bf4022dda762bf61acf16ac704c67
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > As of today this is a job for the vectorizer if-conversion pass then.
> >
> > OTOH I believe we should work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15/16 Regression] wrong |[14/15 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug ID: 120170
Summary: [meta-bug] C++ std::locale
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5499
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
numpunct::_M_initialize_numpunct in config/locale/gnu/numeric_members.cc
says:
// NB: There is no way to extract this info from posix locales.
// _M_truename = __nl_langinfo_l(YESSTR, __cloc);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #5)
> > The given example is an easy one to drop, but I wonder what would happen if
> > the block had other instruct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51018
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
commit r14-11749-g8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116047
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
commit r14-11749-g8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Thu, 8 May 2025, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
commit r15-9642-g7317c72b028e057ddbe918ff6968e5e586a35850
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Richi, do you plan to backport this to gcc-13 and maybe gcc-12? Or should we
close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Andrew, are you still planning to address this? Otherwise I'll give it a stab.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52389
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||120170
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
-> https://sourceforge.net/p/valgrind/mailman/message/59181622/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120172
Bug ID: 120172
Summary: Preprocessor error leads to cascading failures in
standard header instantiations
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 8 May 2025, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
>
> --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdf689a1f12e887c22c9989e6728ffac981f71ce
commit r14-11750-gcdf689a1f12e887c22c9989e6728ffac981f71ce
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #7 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the pointers!
We can optimize the code further and remove the branch completely.
For P10:
xststdcdp 0,1,48
setnbc 9,32
setbc 3,34
isel 3,9,3,2
blr
Fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] -Os |[12/13 Regression] -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120173
Bug ID: 120173
Summary: [OpenACC][gcn-offload] wrong 'firstprivate' with 'acc
parallel async' [modified
libgomp.oacc-fortran/lib-13.f90]
Product: gcc
Version: 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112351
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:351ac78e48fa897080cf8bbb71618df9c428ad30
commit r13-9643-g351ac78e48fa897080cf8bbb71618df9c428ad30
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116352
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e8bd720b1a618a39e2a41eec05e935c32d295f3
commit r16-473-g1e8bd720b1a618a39e2a41eec05e935c32d295f3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174
Bug ID: 120174
Summary: ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to
generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with
-std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The WIP patch looks reasonable to me.
On which testcase you see something weird? On the #c1 I don't see anything
wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120175
Bug ID: 120175
Summary: Performance: compiling a program with using a library
slows other code.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118388
--- Comment #4 from Simon Martin ---
We ended up doing a different fix for #118319 and the case I mentionned in the
initial comment does not ICE, but the underlying problem still exists.
I ran the c++ testsuite with the use of -fpermissive for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120175
newbie-02 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||15.1.0
Summary|[15/16 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93586e5d51188bf71f4f8fae4ee94ff631740f24
commit r16-472-g93586e5d51188bf71f4f8fae4ee94ff631740f24
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #15 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
I don't know why it's only defined for rtems, but I would imagine it's either
an oversight, or that it's the only target with libatomic support without
hardware atomics. Is there a libatomic for hppa, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
commit r14-11749-g8cbe033a8a88fe6437cc5d343ae0ddf8dd3455c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9d390ab17d9395ce20e899ef0180052ed79d332
commit r14-11751-ga9d390ab17d9395ce20e899ef0180052ed79d332
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
Inconsistent CFI state!
SHOULD have:
.cfi_def_cfa 15, 16
.cfi_offset 2, -16
.cfi_offset 10, -12
.cfi_offset 11, -8
.cfi_offset 24, -4
DO have:
.cfi_def_cfa 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120176
Bug ID: 120176
Summary: Missed reduction chain vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
--- Comment #6 from Nathaniel Shead ---
Created attachment 61367
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61367&action=edit
clone-4_b.s
This is the testcase I've been using:
$ cat ~/t/modules/clone-4_a.C
// PR c++/120125
// { dg-ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120089
--- Comment #27 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9def392a1b63a198d15d972f73b4afc888389d7c
commit r16-460-g9def392a1b63a198d15d972f73b4afc888389d7c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120110
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Pignard ---
Thanks Eric for your quick answer.
Agreed, especially since GNAT 15 is available now with Alire pre-release:
https://forum.ada-lang.io/t/gnat-fsf-15-available-in-alire-pre-release/2038
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bac74b0d0141a440275797a059c2b43978cd9e1c
commit r16-466-gbac74b0d0141a440275797a059c2b43978cd9e1c
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120164
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> As of today this is a job for the vectorizer if-conversion pass then.
>
> OTOH I believe we should work towards vectorizing the prefetches themselves
> rathe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aacaa3b13bca508cb6cb803d11cb942b2de8c0db
commit r16-463-gaacaa3b13bca508cb6cb803d11cb942b2de8c0db
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120146
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b38e3a7196d25bc8bcb1fe55da7663745cea9470
commit r16-464-gb38e3a7196d25bc8bcb1fe55da7663745cea9470
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116939
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2bb7ffe84840d8f4ba6c0e5acdbbad8ca9d3603
commit r16-465-gf2bb7ffe84840d8f4ba6c0e5acdbbad8ca9d3603
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2bb7ffe84840d8f4ba6c0e5acdbbad8ca9d3603
commit r16-465-gf2bb7ffe84840d8f4ba6c0e5acdbbad8ca9d3603
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
Bug 116938 depends on bug 116939, which changed state.
Bug 116939 Summary:
rewrite_to_defined_overflow/gimple_with_undefined_signed_overflow should also
rewrite VCEs (from/to integral types) into casts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119217
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12d6fa2a21140166181ae3be7711d60e62c569d7
commit r16-467-g12d6fa2a21140166181ae3be7711d60e62c569d7
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120122
Bug 120122 depends on bug 116939, which changed state.
Bug 116939 Summary:
rewrite_to_defined_overflow/gimple_with_undefined_signed_overflow should also
rewrite VCEs (from/to integral types) into casts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c73c99b6a8c3a562fef360bc269bd60bab36076
commit r16-468-g8c73c99b6a8c3a562fef360bc269bd60bab36076
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Workaround: -fno-combine-stack-adjustments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120181
Bug ID: 120181
Summary: Bug in alpha jump tables
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120180
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #16 from John David Anglin ---
Your patch works for me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-May/846366.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174
--- Comment #2 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
Actually this is most likely an original bug because unlike other bugs that
started with the same commit, this one segfaults without printing any
stacktrace.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117818
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
We still support powerpc64-* just fine. And powerpc-linux (the 32-bit target)
is
tested just fine as well, and the community does support it. No one cares
_too_
much about it anymore, but why let it d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120168
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/683008.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120165
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 61372
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61372&action=edit
Preprocessed source for ICE reported in PR-120165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Created attachment 61371
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61371&action=edit
reduced test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120160
m.cencora at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.cencora at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Brrr due to aggressive reduction t.ii became kind of invalid/incomplete which
means the reduced test case errors out early for release branches 12 and 13.
However, running the original tests
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo