https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #4 from LIU Hao ---
configure:5: checking whether _get_osfhandle is defined in
configure:54468:
/home/lh_mouse/GitHub/MINGW-packages/mingw-w64-gcc/src/build-MINGW32/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc
-B/home/lh_mouse/GitHub/MINGW-packag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yup, just noticed that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #10)
> This should work as a trivial fix: Replace the crashing line with
>
> if (l == 0)
> return clusters.copy();
>
> I'll bootstrap and regtest this fix and then I'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52f6ab55051ff43fd1b40ff06d9501043f8ba844
commit r16-438-g52f6ab55051ff43fd1b40ff06d9501043f8ba844
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
> I cannot see the warning with x86-64 gcc 15.1 (or trunk or 14.1 or 12.1).
>
> Maybe ARM GCC is doing something different? But this should not be
> target-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.3.1 |14.2.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d884e9c5c746a41b069905f990fa72b9e550
commit r16-449-gd884e9c5c746a41b069905f990fa72b9e550
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
Bug 116938 depends on bug 111276, which changed state.
Bug 111276 Summary: rewrite_to_defined_overflow rewrites already defined code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
ble-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250506192155-r16-433-g2c46a74d4707bd-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250507 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For input:
> > int f11(float *x, float val, int n)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
Bug ID: 120158
Summary: Incorrect UNSIGNED maxval/maxloc etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > > Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77780c31485eeb71e9fabf8ea9d4b1af0c3be595
commit r15-9633-g77780c31485eeb71e9fabf8ea9d4b1af0c3be595
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #4)
> > Ah indeed, -msve-vector-bits= does do what I expected. Feel free to close
> > this if it's not tracking anything new then.
>
> Ok. FWIW the original testcase for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #9 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Vladimir Terzi from comment #8)
> I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in
> comment #2 will be ignored.
>
> (In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] FAIL: |[16 Regression] FAIL:
|libg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Bug ID: 120167
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL:
libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120127
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Terzi ---
I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in comment
#2 will be ignored.
(In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> I suppose it is somewhat naive of gfortran contributors to expect t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83ef989ee189902ca1d434feb0f3dd50519e92cb
commit r16-437-g83ef989ee189902ca1d434feb0f3dd50519e92cb
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106065
philippe.wautelet at cnrs dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.2.0 |15.1.0
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #4 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
For the following test:
int test1 (double x)
{
return __builtin_isinf_sign (x);
}
The assembly generated by trunk is:
xststdcdp 0,1,48
mfcr 3,128
rlwinm 3,3,3,1
bne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
Bug ID: 120157
Summary: No use of SVE early break vectorisation in FP loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, missed-optimization
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For input:
> int f11(float *x, float val, int n)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> if (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Bug ID: 120155
Summary: ICE when lambda return type is the decltype of
statement expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120088
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Bug ID: 120153
Summary: Missing UINTEGER symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #9 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > I will verify now that the M2 issue is related to enabling LRA.
>
> The M2 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #9)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > > I will verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66279
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a145eaf1128ef4392cf6e624f4b23648cbe645eb
commit r13-9636-ga145eaf1128ef4392cf6e624f4b23648cbe645eb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
One consequence of it not being a warning option is that -Werror=write-strings
is accepted but behaves identically to -Wwrite-strings, which is pretty
surprising.
You need to use -Wwrite-strings -Werror=d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bed0053a28e238cb9c079a3ec89341541390f933
commit r14-11747-gbed0053a28e238cb9c079a3ec89341541390f933
Author: Robin Dapp
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #2 from Viktor Horsmanheimo
---
Created attachment 61355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61355&action=edit
PoC in C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61356&action=edit
reducing
The templated type alias is not part of the problem so remove it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Bug ID: 120161
Summary: Deduction failure with nested dependent type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Bug ID: 120162
Summary: Prefetch causes vectorization to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #1 from Viktor Horsmanheimo
---
Created attachment 61354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61354&action=edit
PoC in c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Bug ID: 120156
Summary: [14 Regression] Segfault while compiling eigen test
bdcsvd.cpp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107761
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Desmond Gold from comment #3)
> I've implemented c++23 features for in libstdc++ (hopefully) which
> is inspired by other reference implementations (libc++, STL, Kokkos).
>
> https://godbolt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I will try to reduce the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #13 from Alexey Merzlyakov
---
> There is https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660968.html
> which (though I am not 100% sure) will help the situtation.
Thank you for the reference, this definitely makes sense.
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117978
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jennifer Schmitz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd
commit r16-446-g210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd
Author: Jennifer Schmitz
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116047
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Surya!
Hrm yes, xststdcdp _does_ return a sign bit as well. Do we currently say
that in RTL as well?
Unfortunately we cannot just follow an xststdcdp by a setb, setb tests bit 1,
but
the tdp sets b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61350&action=edit
gcc16-pr120152.patch
So far lightly tested patch. The abilist regressions are gone with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #5 from LIU Hao ---
issue seems to be that in `ac_fn_cxx_try_compile ()` there's
} && test -s conftest.$ac_objext; then :
which checks whether an object file is created, but the cmdline above has `-S`
which produces an asse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120088
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #2)
> The divergence is probably due to that Clang and EDG haven't implemented
> CWG2658
> (https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2658.html).
Yes, that would explain i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Bell ---
As a note, this code doesn't evoke a warning on any other compiler/target that
I tried.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #13 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #12)
> With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
>
> FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Reiter ---
Thanks for working on this.
I applied the gcc patch and can confirm that the original example no longer
crashes. I found another crasher though and reduced it to:
$ cat test.c
// gcc -O1 -gcodeview -c t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
Simon Sobisch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
: In function 'void fun()':
:6:17: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains
'decl with visibility' structure, have 'parm_decl' in start_decl, at
cp/decl.cc:6037
6 | in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Mark, when you get a chance to work on this, if you haven't tried it before,
I'd recommend doing a bootstrap w/ -gcodeview enabled by default to see what
falls out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE when generic lambda |ICE with generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Without using a generic lambda (auto), GCC gives this error message:
```
: In function 'void fun()':
:6:17: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const
static member 'fun()a'
6 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101533
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6652764a4558fe9487f17e6c7b18fbc577e8df7
commit r13-9641-ge6652764a4558fe9487f17e6c7b18fbc577e8df7
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101478
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:068aa9a7a9cc163ee5f31bffd746a8cd2ebfef7e
commit r13-9640-g068aa9a7a9cc163ee5f31bffd746a8cd2ebfef7e
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120130
--- Comment #3 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
This slightly modified program:
```
template
class Foo;
template
int g(const Foo&);
template
class Foo {
public:
template
int g(const Foo&) = delete;
friend int g<>(const Foo&);
private:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #6 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> And yet somehow it does. Confirmed.
You forgot to restore the old `CXXFLAGS`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|15.0|16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Bug ID: 120159
Summary: is_layout_compatible_v not exported in std module
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120160
Bug ID: 120160
Summary: Implicitly import std if stadard library header is
included
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #5 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
The input gimple to RTL has the builtin split into two parts: ‘isinfD’ and
‘signbitD’ due to which in the final assembly generated, we have instructions
to check the sign bit of the floating point numb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119864
Alberto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alberto.gcc.bugzilla@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:809c5d7486f91d59e798e0c70ac887f837039ece
commit r15-9635-g809c5d7486f91d59e798e0c70ac887f837039ece
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a1f3615c01cdbf5b2d37448c8bb09a96d5e3330
commit r16-451-g8a1f3615c01cdbf5b2d37448c8bb09a96d5e3330
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e52f71b6dd888f0d5548d9f5bd139601dbafb3be
commit r15-9631-ge52f71b6dd888f0d5548d9f5bd139601dbafb3be
Author: Tomasz KamiÅs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107761
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a33b5db97c4e87bd02f1af1a75b2d84376442fa0
commit r16-442-ga33b5db97c4e87bd02f1af1a75b2d84376442fa0
Author: Luc Grosheintz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And to avoid repeated scanning of DECL_INITIAL when we add more of these
patterns we could record classification of the table in a custom
internal decl attribute we add, __attribute__(("table kind"(int)))
w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61351
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61351&action=edit
gcc16-pr120153.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:337d3cdfa8bb8b8404d62ea45690095f9b566cbb
commit r13-9635-g337d3cdfa8bb8b8404d62ea45690095f9b566cbb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79786
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0e3078580f4834e4d3d1ba517016a0220b4e3b6
commit r13-9637-gc0e3078580f4834e4d3d1ba517016a0220b4e3b6
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87984
--- Comment #48 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2d0fb238b1a6eab85924515f0c1ffc2f939e6a7
commit r13-9638-gf2d0fb238b1a6eab85924515f0c1ffc2f939e6a7
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da579a833cf5a5ae463be3f4da70df782612a800
commit r13-9639-gda579a833cf5a5ae463be3f4da70df782612a800
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0e6d797b35ae89044f967160d4abe3868190f0f
commit r15-9636-gd0e6d797b35ae89044f967160d4abe3868190f0f
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41c8e9b61defb6c616bf35ac9693a52f848afca3
commit r16-452-g41c8e9b61defb6c616bf35ac9693a52f848afca3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61356|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #10)
> I thought that switch lowering shouldn't run into empty switches (can't
> recall what made me think that though). I'll look into why that happens.
Well before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
commit r16-454-g0a339746e7646bacf2c8aa5512268d23660f26f9
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Dat
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
