https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #4 from LIU Hao ---
configure:5: checking whether _get_osfhandle is defined in
configure:54468:
/home/lh_mouse/GitHub/MINGW-packages/mingw-w64-gcc/src/build-MINGW32/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc
-B/home/lh_mouse/GitHub/MINGW-packag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yup, just noticed that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #10)
> This should work as a trivial fix: Replace the crashing line with
>
> if (l == 0)
> return clusters.copy();
>
> I'll bootstrap and regtest this fix and then I'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120114
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52f6ab55051ff43fd1b40ff06d9501043f8ba844
commit r16-438-g52f6ab55051ff43fd1b40ff06d9501043f8ba844
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
> I cannot see the warning with x86-64 gcc 15.1 (or trunk or 14.1 or 12.1).
>
> Maybe ARM GCC is doing something different? But this should not be
> target-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|14.3.1 |14.2.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d884e9c5c746a41b069905f990fa72b9e550
commit r16-449-gd884e9c5c746a41b069905f990fa72b9e550
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116938
Bug 116938 depends on bug 111276, which changed state.
Bug 111276 Summary: rewrite_to_defined_overflow rewrites already defined code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
ble-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250506192155-r16-433-g2c46a74d4707bd-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250507 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120154
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For input:
> > int f11(float *x, float val, int n)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
Bug ID: 120158
Summary: Incorrect UNSIGNED maxval/maxloc etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #1)
> > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > > Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77780c31485eeb71e9fabf8ea9d4b1af0c3be595
commit r15-9633-g77780c31485eeb71e9fabf8ea9d4b1af0c3be595
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #4)
> > Ah indeed, -msve-vector-bits= does do what I expected. Feel free to close
> > this if it's not tracking anything new then.
>
> Ok. FWIW the original testcase for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #9 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Vladimir Terzi from comment #8)
> I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in
> comment #2 will be ignored.
>
> (In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] FAIL: |[16 Regression] FAIL:
|libg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120167
Bug ID: 120167
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL:
libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120127
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120131
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Terzi ---
I initially changed the status, because I assumed that my questions in comment
#2 will be ignored.
(In reply to kargls from comment #6)
> I suppose it is somewhat naive of gfortran contributors to expect t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83ef989ee189902ca1d434feb0f3dd50519e92cb
commit r16-437-g83ef989ee189902ca1d434feb0f3dd50519e92cb
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106065
philippe.wautelet at cnrs dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.2.0 |15.1.0
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #4 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
For the following test:
int test1 (double x)
{
return __builtin_isinf_sign (x);
}
The assembly generated by trunk is:
xststdcdp 0,1,48
mfcr 3,128
rlwinm 3,3,3,1
bne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
Bug ID: 120157
Summary: No use of SVE early break vectorisation in FP loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, missed-optimization
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120157
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> Not sure if this is a target-specific issue or not. For input:
> int f11(float *x, float val, int n)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> if (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120155
Bug ID: 120155
Summary: ICE when lambda return type is the decltype of
statement expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120088
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #2 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Bug ID: 120153
Summary: Missing UINTEGER symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #9 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > I will verify now that the M2 issue is related to enabling LRA.
>
> The M2 i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113939
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #9)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #8)
> > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7)
> > > I will verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66279
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a145eaf1128ef4392cf6e624f4b23648cbe645eb
commit r13-9636-ga145eaf1128ef4392cf6e624f4b23648cbe645eb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
One consequence of it not being a warning option is that -Werror=write-strings
is accepted but behaves identically to -Wwrite-strings, which is pretty
surprising.
You need to use -Wwrite-strings -Werror=d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bed0053a28e238cb9c079a3ec89341541390f933
commit r14-11747-gbed0053a28e238cb9c079a3ec89341541390f933
Author: Robin Dapp
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #2 from Viktor Horsmanheimo
---
Created attachment 61355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61355&action=edit
PoC in C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61356&action=edit
reducing
The templated type alias is not part of the problem so remove it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Bug ID: 120161
Summary: Deduction failure with nested dependent type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
Bug ID: 120162
Summary: Prefetch causes vectorization to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120162
--- Comment #1 from Viktor Horsmanheimo
---
Created attachment 61354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61354&action=edit
PoC in c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that in vect_analyze_early_break_dependences we do
stmt_vec_info stmt_vinfo
= vect_stmt_to_vectorize (loop_vinfo->lookup_stmt (stmt));
and look at virtual operands of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
--- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead ---
FWIW I have a WIP patch that fixes the ICE (also for the original testcase):
diff --git a/gcc/cp/optimize.cc b/gcc/cp/optimize.cc
index 6f9a77f407a..fc4d6c2e351 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/optimize.cc
+++ b/gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119956
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
This might be kind of easy to improve upon by extending lib/lto.exp's torture
variants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119956
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
We've been moving it there for years downstream and had no problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120125
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120145
--- Comment #6 from Kirill A. Korinsky ---
I have backported both patch to used 8.4.0 as bootstrap compiler and 11.2.0 as
target.
It crashed the same way:
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from /us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb
commit r16-434-g625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Wed M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
--- Comment #13 from Robin Dapp ---
Going to push this to the 14 branch later today if the x86 testsuite shows no
regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae987baeb5fb70877fd007db80b77e374f676c76
commit r16-435-gae987baeb5fb70877fd007db80b77e374f676c76
Author: hongtao.liu
Date: Tue Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120135
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
Bug ID: 120148
Summary: -fno-builtin suppresses -Wformat warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: dri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
--- Comment #1 from Florian Krohm ---
Created attachment 61349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61349&action=edit
gcc -v output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8c4b6aa8e0521770c6f9fd48dd13dd85e3a2fc9
commit r16-436-gb8c4b6aa8e0521770c6f9fd48dd13dd85e3a2fc9
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu May 1 06:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Plea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
Bug ID: 120149
Summary: ICE in GCC when deducing return type with nested
lambdas using accumulate with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120150
Bug ID: 120150
Summary: ICE in GCC when deducing return type with nested
lambdas using accumulate with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see how that commit can cause this.
The native_handle_type is determined by:
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_STDIO_PURE
using native_handle_type = __c_file*; // FILE*
#elif _GLIBCXX_USE__GET_OSFHANDLE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
XU Kailiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xu2k3l4 at outlook dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[13/14/15/16 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120138
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
Summary|(14/15/16)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 118964, which changed state.
Bug 118964 Summary: include in the module causes a
compilation error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118964
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120149
--- Comment #1 from MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR ---
*** Bug 120150 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120150
MARIO RODRIGUEZ BEJAR changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120148
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120151
Bug ID: 120151
Summary: ICE in GCC when compiling a templated decltype with
incomplete lambda body with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120134
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
Bug ID: 120152
Summary: [15/16 Regression] libgfortran ABI problem starting
with r15-4124
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080
--- Comment #10 from Filip Kastl ---
The line that crashes GCC seems to be this one
gcc_checking_assert (l > 0);
where l is the number of clusters of a switch. At this point in compilation
clusters = cases so this means that bit-test switch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
Bug ID: 120156
Summary: [14 Regression] Segfault while compiling eigen test
bdcsvd.cpp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107761
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Desmond Gold from comment #3)
> I've implemented c++23 features for in libstdc++ (hopefully) which
> is inspired by other reference implementations (libc++, STL, Kokkos).
>
> https://godbolt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120156
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I will try to reduce the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #13 from Alexey Merzlyakov
---
> There is https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/660968.html
> which (though I am not 100% sure) will help the situtation.
Thank you for the reference, this definitely makes sense.
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117978
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jennifer Schmitz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd
commit r16-446-g210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd
Author: Jennifer Schmitz
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120137
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116047
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108900
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120061
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
commit r16-450-gedf745dc519ddbfef127e2789bf11bfbacd300b7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97786
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Surya!
Hrm yes, xststdcdp _does_ return a sign bit as well. Do we currently say
that in RTL as well?
Unfortunately we cannot just follow an xststdcdp by a setb, setb tests bit 1,
but
the tdp sets b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120152
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61350&action=edit
gcc16-pr120152.patch
So far lightly tested patch. The abilist regressions are gone with it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120147
--- Comment #5 from LIU Hao ---
issue seems to be that in `ac_fn_cxx_try_compile ()` there's
} && test -s conftest.$ac_objext; then :
which checks whether an object file is created, but the cmdline above has `-S`
which produces an asse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118950
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120088
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #2)
> The divergence is probably due to that Clang and EDG haven't implemented
> CWG2658
> (https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2658.html).
Yes, that would explain i
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
