https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056
Bug ID: 120056
Summary: Circular constraint satisfaction error with
non-trivial container iterators to callables taking
std::expected parameters
Product: gcc
Ver
/tree.h:3979
0x7bef88 fndecl_built_in_p
../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:6922
0x7bef88 convert_arguments
/home/dcb40b/gcc/working/gcc/../../trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc:4340
The bug seems to have started in the last few days:
foundBugs $ ../results.20250430.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w -std=gnu99 bug1098.c
foundBugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|15.0|16.0
Summary|ice in convert_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61251|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #38 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #37)
> You may want to revert the previous change though.
What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the
`force_align_arg_pointer` attribute?
I'm quite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140
--- Comment #20 from Tamar Christina ---
We're currently working on it.
The improvements come from architectures where the code vectorized. The
performance losses come from those where it didn't vectorize, or the vectorizer
generated inefficien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119044
--- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl ---
Nice. From the graph it looks like this helped a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051
Bug ID: 120051
Summary: codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> also seen with gcc-13
What do you mean exactly here? That it cannot compile GCC 12, or itself, or
GCC 15 or...?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] ICE on |[14/15/16 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> going to be interesting to decide what to do on branches ... does it affect
> the ABI of any part of libstdc++, in the shared object or instantiated
> templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I should mention That this issue was first identified by Vincent Magnin.
Vincent has also confirmed the issue on gfortran 11.5 on Ubuntu. There is also
a variation where it compiles and segfaults at run tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
Bug ID: 120052
Summary: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at
omp-low.cc:4005
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3
commit r12-11082-g91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3
Author: Alex Coplan
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> On branches I'm thinking to give the warning under -Wabi=0. It's awkward
> that plain -Wabi currently gives a warning, though that could change.
That is, since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61262
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61262&action=edit
Cleaned up and reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Oh s***t! Don't do that - post in the existing PR.
I must confess that I looked at the second testcase and couldn't see the
difference. I'll put stronger glasses on.
Thanks
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
during GIMPLE pass: omplower
dump file: /app/output.cpp.010t.omplower
: In function 'f':
:5:14: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005
5 | counts[i][indx] = 1;
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (repl) != ERROR_MARK);
This is due to s.1 not being recorded in the #pragma:
#pragma omp parallel firstprivate(counts.3) firstprivate(D.3444)
private(counts)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 114411, which changed state.
Bug 114411 Summary: [14/15/16 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on
aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou ---
> What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the
> `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute?
-mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is only used here:
/* In 32bit, use MIN_STACK_BOU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-01
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119965
--- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl ---
Here is a graph showing this code size increase.
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=293.378.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
FIWI I cannot reproduce with GCC 12 on x86-64/Linux and Valgrind is silent (it
is usually very good at catching finalization issues), so this may be more a
code generation issue on the PA than an Ada issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120027
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note Clang is working on improving some of the cases on their side
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137956
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou ---
You may want to revert the previous change though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119282
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5
commit r16-332-g9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053
Bug ID: 120053
Summary: __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default
member initializer unnecessarily
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
--- Comment #33 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 102199, which changed state.
Bug 102199 Summary: is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type with
NSDMI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
--- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #14)
> HI Paul,
>
> The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is
> that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name
> while latter does not use result-nam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florin at iucha dot net
--- Comment #37
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 101227, which changed state.
Bug 101227 Summary: Clang++ fails to instantiate std::optional if nested type
has a non-static data member initializer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>This doesn't make sense. It looks like an internal state bug.
It is not. It is more complex because the inner type is not exactly completed
until the outer one is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120039
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.1.0
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> A patch is posted at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/682360.html
The change fixes both build and tests for highway-1.2.0 for me on x86_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119044
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #5)
> Nice. From the graph it looks like this helped a lot.
Must be sth else, the rev was before the last bad run (r16-292).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa6f1df4ec46a20d2292291b192d3331e51b59f8
commit r16-324-gaa6f1df4ec46a20d2292291b192d3331e51b59f8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
It is trapping when asking for the type() of an UNDEFINED range.
Looking up the call chain:
Breakpoint 2, ipcp_store_vr_results () at /gcc/master/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:6366
6366 tmp.update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61261|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #5)
> 6358value_range tmp = plats->m_value_range.m_vr;
> 6359tree type = ipa_get_type (info, i);
> 6360i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
I installed Debian gcc and gnat 12.3.0-14. With it, gen_il-main doesn't
fault. I'm building 12.4.0-5 and I'll see if I can find issue with Debian
build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
buildability:
gcc-13 cannot build anymore gcc-13, seeing the same gnat error.
gnat-12 tests:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=hppa&ver=12.4.0-5&stamp=1742217185&raw=1
(search fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1
commit r14-11718-g7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9
commit r14-11717-gee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111728
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6
commit r14-11716-g074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc
commit r14-11719-gad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc
Author: Arsen Arsenovi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #40 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #39)
> > What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the
> > `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute?
>
> -mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 5/1/25 07:45, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
>
> --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
> (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10)
>> T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119162
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25fe59805029e164bfbe347adbdf62856d1b1b1e
commit r16-325-g25fe59805029e164bfbe347adbdf62856d1b1b1e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
gnat-12 tests:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=hppa&ver=12.4.0-5&stamp=1742217185&raw=1
(search for test-summary)
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a
commit r16-329-g0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
HI Paul,
The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is
that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name
while latter does not use result-name so the function-name
is the resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This reads to me like `-mstackrealign` usually decreases
> `incoming_stack_boundary` from 128 to 32; realignment is actually a result
> of that, right?
Yes, both -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc
commit r16-334-gb6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc
Author: Florian Weimer
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119172
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a
commit r14-11711-g86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10)
> The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
I will close as fixed if no appetite for backporting is expressed in the next
week.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809
--- Comment #33 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e
commit r14-11709-gcae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e
Author: Mark Mentovai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e
commit r14-11713-g623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7
commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7
commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392
commit r14-11720-gd3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
--- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 5/1/25 11:55, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948
>
> --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
> (In reply to kargls from comment #14)
>> HI Pau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piersh at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753
Christian Kreibich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian at zeek dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118659
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6
commit r16-342-g69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo