[Bug c++/120056] New: Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters

2025-05-01 Thread catsith at me dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120056 Bug ID: 120056 Summary: Circular constraint satisfaction error with non-trivial container iterators to callables taking std::expected parameters Product: gcc Ver

[Bug c/120055] New: ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

2025-05-01 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
/tree.h:3979 0x7bef88 fndecl_built_in_p ../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:6922 0x7bef88 convert_arguments /home/dcb40b/gcc/working/gcc/../../trunk/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc:4340 The bug seems to have started in the last few days: foundBugs $ ../results.20250430.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w -std=gnu99 bug1098.c foundBugs

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|15.0|16.0 Summary|ice in convert_

คุณเดือดร้อน เราช่วยคุณได้ ไม่มีโอนก่อนไม่มีมัดจำ

2025-05-01 Thread TPL Group via Gcc-bugs

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61251|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #38 from LIU Hao --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #37) > You may want to revert the previous change though. What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute? I'm quite

[Bug libstdc++/116140] [15/16 Regression] 5-10% slowdown of 483.xalancbmk and 523.xalancbmk_r since r15-2356-ge69456ff9a54ba

2025-05-01 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116140 --- Comment #20 from Tamar Christina --- We're currently working on it. The improvements come from architectures where the code vectorized. The performance losses come from those where it didn't vectorize, or the vectorizer generated inefficien

[Bug tree-optimization/119044] [15 regression] 5-16% slowdown of 436.cactusADM since r15-7665-gee30e2586a3142

2025-05-01 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119044 --- Comment #5 from Filip Kastl --- Nice. From the graph it looks like this helped a lot.

[Bug c/120051] New: codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

2025-05-01 Thread reiter.christoph at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 Bug ID: 120051 Summary: codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0 Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > also seen with gcc-13 What do you mean exactly here? That it cannot compile GCC 12, or itself, or GCC 15 or...?

[Bug ipa/120048] [16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com P

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 Regression] ICE on |[14/15/16 Regression] ICE

[Bug ipa/120044] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above with "-fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/120012] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] P1008R1 causes tail padding reuse in C++20 mode

2025-05-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > going to be interesting to decide what to do on branches ... does it affect > the ABI of any part of libstdc++, in the shared object or instantiated > templates

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

2025-05-01 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.3

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

2025-05-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- I should mention That this issue was first identified by Vincent Magnin. Vincent has also confirmed the issue on gfortran 11.5 on Ubuntu. There is also a variation where it compiles and segfaults at run tim

[Bug c++/120052] New: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005

2025-05-01 Thread ldalessandro at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 Bug ID: 120052 Summary: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/116564] [12 Regression] aarch64: gcc hangs when compiling vst2_f64 instrinsic at -O1 and above since r12-4910-g66f206b853

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3 commit r12-11082-g91be90b5ae9ee345bd011afdf02df7003d7598d3 Author: Alex Coplan Da

[Bug rtl-optimization/116564] [12 Regression] aarch64: gcc hangs when compiling vst2_f64 instrinsic at -O1 and above since r12-4910-g66f206b853

2025-05-01 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116564 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/120012] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] P1008R1 causes tail padding reuse in C++20 mode

2025-05-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3) > On branches I'm thinking to give the warning under -Wabi=0. It's awkward > that plain -Wabi currently gives a warning, though that could change. That is, since

[Bug c++/120052] internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61262 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61262&action=edit Cleaned up and reduced testcase

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Oh s***t! Don't do that - post in the existing PR. I must confess that I looked at the second testcase and couldn't see the difference. I'll put stronger glasses on. Thanks Paul

[Bug c++/120052] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- during GIMPLE pass: omplower dump file: /app/output.cpp.010t.omplower : In function 'f': :5:14: internal compiler error: in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.cc:4005 5 | counts[i][indx] = 1; |

[Bug c++/120052] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (repl) != ERROR_MARK); This is due to s.1 not being recorded in the #pragma: #pragma omp parallel firstprivate(counts.3) firstprivate(D.3444) private(counts)

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

2025-05-01 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 114411, which changed state. Bug 114411 Summary: [14/15/16 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug target/114411] [14/15/16 Regression] 12% exec time slowdown of 433.milc on aarch64

2025-05-01 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/120052] [13/14/15/16 Regression] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

2025-05-01 Thread mcccs at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou --- > What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the > `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute? -mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is only used here: /* In 32bit, use MIN_STACK_BOU

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-01 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/119965] [16 Regression] 531.deepsjeng_r binary is 50% bigger since r16-116-gcfb04e0de6aa43

2025-05-01 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119965 --- Comment #1 from Filip Kastl --- Here is a graph showing this code size increase. https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=293.378.4

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- FIWI I cannot reproduce with GCC 12 on x86-64/Linux and Valgrind is silent (it is usually very good at catching finalization issues), so this may be more a code generation issue on the PA than an Ada issue.

[Bug target/120027] Missing simplifications of SVE uxtb intrinsics

2025-05-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120027 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note Clang is working on improving some of the cases on their side https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137956

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou --- You may want to revert the previous change though.

[Bug libstdc++/119282] [15 Regression] views::transform producing ranges piped to views::join | ranges::to() fails to compile in constant evaluation.

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119282 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5 commit r16-332-g9f523d49ada91050445f71821a9a06b0988402f5 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/120053] New: __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

2025-05-01 Thread thiago at kde dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 Bug ID: 120053 Summary: __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org --- Comment #33 fr

[Bug c++/120053] __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 102199, which changed state. Bug 102199 Summary: is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type with NSDMI https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/102199] is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type with NSDMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roi.jacobson1 at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/108588] __is_constructible returns wrong value for invalid (but non deleted) default constructor

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108588 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 102199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/113008] Trivially default constructible requires default member initializer before the end of its enclosing class

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113008 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargls from comment #14) > HI Paul, > > The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is > that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name > while latter does not use result-nam

[Bug libstdc++/101227] Clang++ fails to instantiate std::optional if nested type has a non-static data member initializer

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/96645] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||florin at iucha dot net --- Comment #37

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 101227, which changed state. Bug 101227 Summary: Clang++ fails to instantiate std::optional if nested type has a non-static data member initializer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101227 What|

[Bug c++/120053] __is_trivially_constructible() requiring default member initializer unnecessarily

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120053 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >This doesn't make sense. It looks like an internal state bug. It is not. It is more complex because the inner type is not exactly completed until the outer one is.

[Bug c++/120039] [15/16 Regression] Structured binding in condition ICE since r15-1793

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120039 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug tree-optimization/120043] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with -fallow-store-data-races on x86_64-linux-gnu since r15-1391-g4b75ed33fa5fd6

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |15.1.0 Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/120046] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-gcse" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120046 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Priority|P3

[Bug target/120036] [16 Regression] ICE on highway-1.2.0: during RTL pass: rrvl: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.cc:1032 since r16-271-gd1cada7481420a

2025-05-01 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > A patch is posted at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/682360.html The change fixes both build and tests for highway-1.2.0 for me on x86_

[Bug ipa/120048] [16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

2025-05-01 Thread mcccs at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/119044] [15 regression] 5-16% slowdown of 436.cactusADM since r15-7665-gee30e2586a3142

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119044 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #5) > Nice. From the graph it looks like this helped a lot. Must be sth else, the rev was before the last bad run (r16-292).

[Bug tree-optimization/120003] [12/13/14/15 Regression] missed optimization around a loop with a checker

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa6f1df4ec46a20d2292291b192d3331e51b59f8 commit r16-324-gaa6f1df4ec46a20d2292291b192d3331e51b59f8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

2025-05-01 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- It is trapping when asking for the type() of an UNDEFINED range. Looking up the call chain: Breakpoint 2, ipcp_store_vr_results () at /gcc/master/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.cc:6366 6366 tmp.update

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61261|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/120048] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{s,2} with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in type, at value-range.h:982

2025-05-01 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #5) > 6358value_range tmp = plats->m_value_range.m_vr; > 6359tree type = ipa_get_type (info, i); > 6360i

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #14 from John David Anglin --- I installed Debian gcc and gnat 12.3.0-14. With it, gen_il-main doesn't fault. I'm building 12.4.0-5 and I'll see if I can find issue with Debian build.

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose --- buildability: gcc-13 cannot build anymore gcc-13, seeing the same gnat error. gnat-12 tests: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=hppa&ver=12.4.0-5&stamp=1742217185&raw=1 (search fo

[Bug target/120036] [16 Regression] ICE on highway-1.2.0: during RTL pass: rrvl: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.cc:1032 since r16-271-gd1cada7481420a

2025-05-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120036 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target|

[Bug c++/115906] [coroutines] missing diagnostic and ICE when co_await used as default argument in function declaration

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1 commit r14-11718-g7b4cb031cf7de0ac350197e4ae869df9fe1d08a1 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/110872] coroutine postcondition is not evaluated

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/115906] [coroutines] missing diagnostic and ICE when co_await used as default argument in function declaration

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115906 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9 commit r14-11717-gee0736f665971446f8665a94ef597f683f8128e9 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/111728] C++ 20 coroutine segmentation fault in generic lambda

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111728 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6 commit r14-11716-g074a89e4c5f9b237176626d464fcc494389905f6 Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/115434] Post contracts are ignored on functions with no return statement.

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c commit r14-11715-gfbe351c9fa344cc53bff8a4e03068c7121af0d0c Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug c++/112341] error: insufficient contextual information to determine type on co_await result in function template

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112341 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc commit r14-11719-gad4c136b906c7658d6e800b3a5241a6dac2e0bdc Author: Arsen Arsenovi

[Bug c++/110871] coroutine precondition should be evaluated before the initial suspend

2025-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110871 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/115434] Post contracts are ignored on functions with no return statement.

2025-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115434 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/110872] coroutine postcondition is not evaluated

2025-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110872 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #40 from LIU Hao --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #39) > > What's the difference between the `-mstackrealign` option and the > > `force_align_arg_pointer` attribute? > > -mstackrealign (ix86_force_align_arg_pointer) is on

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 07:45, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) >> T

[Bug c++/119162] missing error with constexpr new

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119162 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25fe59805029e164bfbe347adbdf62856d1b1b1e commit r16-325-g25fe59805029e164bfbe347adbdf62856d1b1b1e Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue

[Bug ada/119698] gen_il-main: raised PROGRAM_ERROR : finalize/adjust raised exception

2025-05-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin --- gnat-12 tests: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=hppa&ver=12.4.0-5&stamp=1742217185&raw=1 (search for test-summary) === acats Summary === # of expected passes

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a commit r16-329-g0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a Author: Paul Thomas Date: Thu M

[Bug middle-end/120052] [13/14/15/16 Regression] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- HI Paul, The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name while latter does not use result-name so the function-name is the resul

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

2025-05-01 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou --- > This reads to me like `-mstackrealign` usually decreases > `incoming_stack_boundary` from 128 to 32; realignment is actually a result > of that, right? Yes, both -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointe

[Bug c/119950] __builtin_constant_p warning with -Wdeprecated-non-prototype inconsistent

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc commit r16-334-gb6d37ec1dd2a228d94e7b5b438f3aa53684316bc Author: Florian Weimer Date: T

[Bug target/119172] [12/13/14 regression] macOS SDK version is not set by gcc

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119172 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a commit r14-11711-g86b51d7287e9e12e9f9936f376537545e31ee03a Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : I will close as fixed if no appetite for backporting is expressed in the next week. Paul

[Bug target/116809] Failure to build GCC on macOS 15 / Xcode 16 for Intel

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116809 --- Comment #33 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e commit r14-11709-gcae584bddd0e348d9ac6f9bd917b47255a26458e Author: Mark Mentovai

[Bug target/116827] New C++ failures in macOS 15

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116827 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e commit r14-11713-g623aaebc7d755ef8696834bebd14f8eddd88200e Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/119034] Nested using-declaration doesn't do ADL or uses wrong associated namespace (overly strict use of deleted function before ADL)

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/119034] Nested using-declaration doesn't do ADL or uses wrong associated namespace (overly strict use of deleted function before ADL)

2025-05-01 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119034 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68942] overly strict use of deleted function before argument-dependent lookup (ADL)

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 commit r16-330-g1fb5abc3919f376f3dedccad636eba4a4ad7e4a7 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/105475] coroutines: ICE in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9183

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392 commit r14-11720-gd3389c96234eb3c259867edc91876571b5254392 Author: Iain Sandoe D

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 11:55, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to kargls from comment #14) >> HI Pau

[Bug c++/107022] error: use of deleted function 'std::unordered_map

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107022 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/103923] is_invocable inexplicably fails

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||piersh at hotmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/105475] coroutines: ICE in coerce_template_parms, at cp/pt.cc:9183

2025-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105475 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on unreachable code with -O0

2025-05-01 Thread christian at zeek dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 Christian Kreibich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christian at zeek dot org --- Comme

[Bug tree-optimization/118659] get_known_nonzero_bits_1 should use wi::bit_and_not instead of `a & ~b`

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118659 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/118617] the auto_vec converts variable that gets passed into supportable_indirect_convert_operation could use internal storage

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 commit r16-342-g69bcf1d6aa52a531f7bc4976e407325fe9742cf6 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/118617] the auto_vec converts variable that gets passed into supportable_indirect_convert_operation could use internal storage

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/120059] [16 regression] ICE when building mesa in vartrack since r16-286

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120059 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/118090] unsignedp argument get_compare_parts is unused by callers

2025-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118090 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Status|ASSIGNED

  1   2   >