https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #17 from
specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250430/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120045
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120046
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |15.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120046
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120046
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120040
Bug ID: 120040
Summary: Module ICE when constexpr function calls new on class
withe empty destructor.
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07
--- Comment #35 from Gabriel Ivăncescu ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #34)
>
> My experience is that _sometimes_ (how often?) GCC assumes the stack is
> aligned. Yes, in theory it shouldn't, but in practice that's not the case.
> Maybe w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119712
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f685d317738524dc837dee94bb762f71ff30fb23
commit r15-9607-gf685d317738524dc837dee94bb762f71ff30fb23
Author: Andrew MacLeo
--prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250430 (experimental) (GCC)
[519] %
[519] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out
[520] %
[520
th: ../gcc-trunk/configure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250430 (experime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120045
Bug ID: 120045
Summary: analyzer: False positive with guarded NULL dereference
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250430 (experimental) (GCC)
[554] %
[554] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
0
[555] % gcctk -O2 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre
-fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-gcse small.c
[556] % ./a.out
0
Aborted
[557] %
[557] % cat small.c
int printf(const char *, ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Workaround: add
contiguous :: u, v
to force generation of a proper temporary.
The dump-tree looks really fishy for the subroutine:
{
integer(kind=8) D.4689;
struct array01_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Forgot to add: the main has
struct array01_complex(kind=4) parm.12;
so there needs to be a conversion to a real array (with the right stride etc.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120009
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Interaction with optional bitfield parts is interesting though.
struct X {
unsigned a : 1;
T b : 1;
unsigned b : 1;
};
if 'T' is optional, would 'void b : 1' still take up 1 bit? Dependent
on what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120021
Bug ID: 120021
Summary: Offloading vs. C++ 'std::valarray'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119989
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e268cb27332a1c39a5fc8426ae368c9878f3f241
commit r15-9602-ge268cb27332a1c39a5fc8426ae368c9878f3f241
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Optimization opportunity] |[Optimization opportunity]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120022
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
And this is unrelated to PR 119917 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120024
Bug ID: 120024
Summary: ICE (Segmentation fault) in expand_call when casting
malloc to void (*)(void) and calling it
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
Bug ID: 120025
Summary: rfe: split assignable temporaries from -fpermissive
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not even sure what assignable temporaries is. Do you have an example?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120030
Bug ID: 120030
Summary: ICE in set_init_priority when applying multiple
__attribute__((constructor)) declarations in C
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
So the big problem with this extension is that it will not work with concepts
(and SFINAE) in a decent form. This is why the extension was removed in the
first place.
An example is:
```
template
T f();
tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Bug ID: 120032
Summary: Fails to pattern match clz from DeBruijn
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120031
Bug ID: 120031
Summary: Fails to pattern match ctz from DeBruijn
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120033
Bug ID: 120033
Summary: ICE in c_parser_consume_token when using macro with
malformed #pragma message
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
--- Comment #7 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> So the big problem with this extension is that it will not work with
> concepts (and SFINAE) in a decent form. This is why the extension was
> removed in the firs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120034
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
This is related to having multiple uses of btMask I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120034
Bug ID: 120034
Summary: Fails to recognize bzhi consistently
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120019
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119989
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67d13d11edd070b57d9166e828dc0b734f4e524b
commit r13-9625-g67d13d11edd070b57d9166e828dc0b734f4e524b
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 61250
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61250&action=edit
Tentative fix
Please give it a try on FreeBSD.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120022
Bug ID: 120022
Summary: [Optimization opportunity] Related with Bug 119917 and
120020
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120022
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jin Haobo from comment #4)
> Thank you, but the "correct" code still generate suboptimal assembly code
> for myDivMod1, while Clang is optimal.
> GCC: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/cvadddsz3
> Clan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120023
Bug ID: 120023
Summary: When using c++ modules, put deduction guide in a
separate module unit file, the deduction will be
ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> This seems to be the issue?
>
>[local count: 350791453]:
> _1 = g (i_3);
> if (_1 != 0)
> goto ; [50.00%]
> else
> goto ; [50.00%]
>
>[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5d1f538bb7d2c7a7a4acf4a4516fa8933dc2888
commit r16-300-ge5d1f538bb7d2c7a7a4acf4a4516fa8933dc2888
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You don't need to use the steady_clock, overflows are possible with any clock
:-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120028
Bug ID: 120028
Summary: SIGSEGV at runtime from large static array
initialization accepted silently by GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
--- Comment #5 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> >I've got on clang forum
>
> I tried looking for that but I don't see it on discourse.llvm.org at all nor
> on as an issue at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std::chrono;
int main()
{
std::mutex mx;
std::condition_variable cv;
std::thread sleepy_abs([&] {
time_point end_of_time(minutes::max());
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102266
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #5)
> (I'm asking because of our is far enough back then we can convert the kernel
> code immediately.)
I think I already converted to %a in d689863c1a60b9.
https://g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120029
Bug ID: 120029
Summary: Dangling iterator usage in
std::filesystem::path::operator+=(const
std::filesystem::path &p) when this == p
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120029
Haoxiang Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61253|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a13684dfc7286139064f7d7341462c9995cbd1c
commit r16-303-g1a13684dfc7286139064f7d7341462c9995cbd1c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression] |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120029
--- Comment #2 from Haoxiang Yu ---
Created attachment 61255
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61255&action=edit
The source code that causes the crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119960
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51ba233fe2db562390a6e0a3618420889761bc77
commit r16-305-g51ba233fe2db562390a6e0a3618420889761bc77
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119960
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f44fcdfe18e72f2900d2757375843e88d32c535
commit r16-308-g5f44fcdfe18e72f2900d2757375843e88d32c535
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101670
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120003
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120020
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>performance-critical applications using inline assembly for specialized
>operations like cryptography, multimedia processing,
There are intrinsics for those instead of inline-asm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120020
--- Comment #3 from Jin Haobo ---
The code in my reproduction is wrong. I will re-show the C++ code.
Reproduction C++ code (64-bit variable):
#include
using U = uint64_t;
struct A { U quo; U rem; };
U myDiv(U const& a, U const& b)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120020
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
--- Comment #6 from Richard Sandiford ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> validate_subreg allows the paradoxical subreg even in the case of hard
> register:
> ```
> /* Paradoxical subregs must have offset zero. */
> if (maybe_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120021
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am 99% sure this decl comes from the gimplifier.
>
> gimplify.cc:6415
And it can also show up with some C code too in some cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
--- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am not even sure what assignable temporaries is. Do you have an example?
```
#include
struct A {
int a;
~A() { std::cout << "a=" << a << std::endl; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120024
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120026
Bug ID: 120026
Summary: ICE (Segmentation fault) with -O3 when using ternary
operator to assign strdup to function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119974
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120027
Bug ID: 120027
Summary: Missing simplifications of SVE uxtb intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: aarch64-sve, missed-optimization
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120024
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119989
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
The issue was introduced by the cc0 -> CCmode conversion in r12-226
3ba781d3b5c8efadb60866c9743b657e8f0eb222
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120006
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a85b89e26b1f50997701eb428c2dd71668f216ff
commit r16-304-ga85b89e26b1f50997701eb428c2dd71668f216ff
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Known to fail|16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #11 from Alexey Merzlyakov
---
> So I'd first look at why we created an explicit store through memory rather
> than simple x.y assignment like we see for D.19566.first.
For the examples from "Item1" and "Item2", GCC does not gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120023
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90484ea24e7886f01200619a55c2343728362fc6
commit r15-9612-g90484ea24e7886f01200619a55c2343728362fc6
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 119996, which changed state.
Bug 119996 Summary: [modules] Inline reference to a TU-local entity is nulled
when used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119996
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119938
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa49bb9deb7e040679f184009f38c5027f1a8dc4
commit r15-9611-gaa49bb9deb7e040679f184009f38c5027f1a8dc4
Author: Nathaniel She
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120040
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120023
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 120023, which changed state.
Bug 120023 Summary: When using c++ modules, put deduction guide in a separate
module unit file, the deduction will be ignored
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435
Maxim Egorushkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.yegorushkin at gmail dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435
--- Comment #12 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
gcc-13 and gcc-14 no longer align the last byte of a loop to the last byte of a
L1i-cache-line, when compiled with `-march=native -mtune=native` on Zen3 and
Zen4 CPUs.
I remember gcc-11 or gcc-12 aligni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
Bug ID: 120050
Summary: [15/16 Regression] Fail to bootstrap on mips64el with
--with-arch=gs464 --with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Hmm, the ICE with trunk is from gcc_checking_assert. Thus maybe the difference
between 15 and 16 comes from the different --enable-checking setting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I'd start with inspecting things like binutils version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexey Merzlyakov from comment #11)
> Stack usage for this code is being generated later on the "expand" stage
> when we are addressing local D.2333 variable. It means, that probably there
> mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
binutils is the same binary as for the last successful gcc-12 upload on
2025-03-17.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120018
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|internal compiler e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83161
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.2|16.0
Version|15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
101 - 200 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
