[Bug target/119371] [15/16 Regression][OpenMP] accel/nvptx-none/lto1: ICE for expand_GOMP_SIMT_XCHG_IDX in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119371 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|15.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/119918] formattable returns true for types other than char and wchar_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119918 Tomasz Kamiński changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/109162] C++23 improvements to std::format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b6cc2064306ba506b61f3e224829219033a9373 commit r16-136-g8b6cc2064306ba506b61f3e224829219033a9373 Author: Tomasz KamiÅski Date:

[Bug target/113949] Switch vax to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113949 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|15.0|15.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/119919] 7% exchange2 regression between g:6390fc86995fbd5239497cb9e1797a3af51d3936 and g:f72a2d221539cede358f2487b94bc370c6fc44b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119919 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug libstdc++/109162] C++23 improvements to std::format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162 --- Comment #24 from Tomasz Kamiński --- > Although it doesn't seem to be in the upcoming GCC-15 release. GCC 15.1 has everything expect formatters for adaptors. So ranges, debug presentation, pair, tuple and std::vector::reference will be in.

[Bug rtl-optimization/116479] [15/16 Regression] wrong code with -O -funroll-loops -finline-stringops -fmodulo-sched --param=max-iterations-computation-cost=637924876 on aarch64 since r15-1447-g5d0c1b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116479 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8073fa147248aa67c11227f922d91d784659077e commit r16-140-g8073fa147248aa67c11227f922d91d784659077e Author: Andre Vieira

[Bug libstdc++/109162] C++23 improvements to std::format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162 --- Comment #23 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to Tomasz Kamiński from comment #22) > > That is highly intentional to fix incorrect formatting when the container > > is a string. See https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3881 > > I am well aware of thi

[Bug c/119878] __builtin_has_attribute(VAR, nonstring) does not work on multidimensional arrays marked with nonstring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119878 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the current behavior is correct. nonstring attribute is a declaration attribute. So __builtin_has_attribute returns true if passed a declaration which has one. multi2[1] (like say single + 0) is s

[Bug c++/119930] [16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 --- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I noticed this too. It was working at r16-89-g0650ea627399a0 . for risc-v, our postcommit has it starting within this range https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/compa

[Bug c++/119930] [16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3 since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 regression] |[16 regression] |g++.dg/c

[Bug c/119943] New: -O3 forgets trivial code shift. causing significant slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943 Bug ID: 119943 Summary: -O3 forgets trivial code shift. causing significant slowdown Product: gcc Version: 12.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/119930] [16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/119944] [16] RISC-V: g++.dg/torture/pr119610.C "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944 Edwin Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16] RISC-V:|[16] RISC-V: |

[Bug target/119942] [16 Regression] RISC-V: Segmentation fault in pr103953.exe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119942 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE See Also|

[Bug middle-end/119943] -O3 forgets trivial code shift. causing significant slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/119944] [16] RISC-V: g++.dg/torture/pr119610.C "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug target/119942] New: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Segmentation fault in pr103953.exe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119942 Bug ID: 119942 Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Segmentation fault in pr103953.exe Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/119930] [16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug target/119944] New: [16] RISC-V:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944 Bug ID: 119944 Summary: [16] RISC-V: Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassign

[Bug target/118280] [14/15/16 Regression] __atomic_test_and_set in Microblaze are broken (exposed by r14-4286)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Petazzoni --- Now that GCC 15.1 is out, I was wondering if this issue has somehow been resolved?

[Bug rtl-optimization/119884] [16 Regression] ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636 with -O2 -fno-dse -favoid-store-forwarding since r16-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119884 --- Comment #2 from Konstantinos Eleftheriou --- We have submitted a fix https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681886.html

[Bug tree-optimization/119945] [14/15/16 Regression] missed tail call due to IPA-VRP and different type but same mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/119945] [14/15/16 Regression] missed tail call due to IPA-VRP and different type but same mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119945 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/119943] -O3 forgets trivial code shift. causing significant slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kleinsorge --- I dont think this is the a vectorization issue here! Moving a struct initialization around, seems not related to the duplicate you mentioned, for me. Could you please check again?

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > But it seems to pass for me with the grep with GCC 14 as well? This ended up being because it is discovered in another pass and my grep was inaccurate.

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The xfail was added with r0-128999-gd74db8ff1c8f12 .

[Bug c/116082] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should not warn about strings that end with "\0" but should warn still for -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082 --- Comment #5 from Steffen Nurpmeso --- different to some other comments i think this is plain a bug in gcc. C99, 6.7.8 p21, and C23 is not different (here 6.7.10 p22; disclaimer: i have not truly read any standard beyond C99, though!!) want ``

[Bug fortran/119948] New: Source allocation of pure function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Bug ID: 119948 Summary: Source allocation of pure function result Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortra

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Seen at https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-testresults/20250425213822.d51602cc...@gnu-skx-1.sc.intel.com/T/#u too. But it seems to pass for me with the grep with GCC 14 as well?

[Bug testsuite/119947] New: [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 Bug ID: 119947 Summary: [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fail Severity: normal P

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/60674] missed devirtualization in function called by destructor (g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > devirt-23.C started to pass with r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6 . > > So just need to update the testcase removing the xfail and close this bug as > fixed. The reason

[Bug ipa/60674] missed devirtualization in function called by destructor (g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- devirt-23.C started to pass with r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6 . So just need to update the testcase removing the xfail and close this bug as fixed.

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (Paste got mangled, my grep was just "Discovered")

[Bug testsuite/119947] [16 regression] XPASS g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119947 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/60674] missed devirtualization in function called by destructor (g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/116082] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should not warn about strings that end with "\0" but should warn still for -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082 Steffen Nurpmeso changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steffen at sdaoden dot eu --- Commen

[Bug c/116082] -Wunterminated-string-initialization should not warn about strings that end with "\0" but should warn still for -Wc++-compat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082 --- Comment #6 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is not about padding. The string literal has a final NUL character and yours then has two. The warning is about truncation of the final NUL character in the string literal. So I think the wa

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --

[Bug tree-optimization/112307] Segmentation fault with -O1 -fcode-hoisting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112307 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61179|0 |1 is obsolete|

<    1   2   3