[Bug testsuite/119286] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: delay checking for alignment to load [PR118464]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Schwinge --- Tamar, thanks! I confirm all fixed -- but one: (In reply to myself from comment #1) > ..., and similarly -- but not identical! -- for '-march=gfx1100': > PASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_38.c (tes

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/119818] FAIL: cobol.dg/group2/FUNCTION_DATE___TIME_OMNIBUS.cob -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119818 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/119160] wrong code with -O2 -finstrument-functions-once -favoid-store-forwarding -fnon-call-exceptions -fschedule-insns -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119160 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Philipp Tomsich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e628ff49f7f890d5337369d7b4f8e21a1f17029 commit r16-15-g7e628ff49f7f890d5337369d7b4f8e21a1f17029 Author: kelefth Date: Thu Mar

[Bug libstdc++/119840] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840 --- Comment #4 from Tomasz Kamiński --- I would like to get confirmation from John David Anglin, that warnings no longer appear on the target.

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #10) > Hi Folks, > > Is it worth reverting or fixing this before the 15-branch release? After > all, the bug made its way into the Fedora 42 release? > > C

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] New: [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 Bug ID: 119858 Summary: [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]" Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgomp/119857] New: GCN offloading: occasional 'libgomp.c-c++-common/declare-target-indirect-2.c' execution test FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119857 Bug ID: 119857 Summary: GCN offloading: occasional 'libgomp.c-c++-common/declare-target-indirect-2.c' execution test FAIL Product: gcc Version: 15.0

[Bug testsuite/119286] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: delay checking for alignment to load [PR118464]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286 --- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #8) > Tamar, thanks! I confirm all fixed -- but one: > > (In reply to myself from comment #1) > > ..., and similarly -- but not identical! -- for '-march=gfx1100

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f7ac78efa622e19f38d6a45e857941b3dea1437 commit r16-19-g1f7ac78efa622e19f38d6a45e857941b3dea1437 Author: Richard Biener Date: F

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88b917325546cee24a544dc05cbfbef0febfe25 commit r15-9557-gd88b917325546cee24a544dc05cbfbef0febfe25 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 4/17/25 23:59, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Is it worth reverting or fixing this before the 15-branch release? After all, > the bug made its way into the Fedora 42 release? I'll submi

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression?] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression?] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression?] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Another example: ``` struct A { template const A& f(); const A& g(); }; struct B : public A { using A::f; using A::g; template const int f(); const int g(); }; int main() { B b; b.g();

[Bug libstdc++/119861] New: formatter specialization of formatter for map class scope has set_separator/set_brackets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119861 Bug ID: 119861 Summary: formatter specialization of formatter for map class scope has set_separator/set_brackets Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/119861] formatter specialization for map-like range has set_separator/set_brackets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119861 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- ..which should not: #include struct Map { std::pair* begin(); std::pair* end(); }; template<> constexpr auto std::format_kind = std::range_format::map; int main() { std::formatter fmt; fmt.set_separator("

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargls from comment #12) > On 4/17/25 23:59, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Is it worth reverting or fixing this before the 15-branch release? After > > all, > > the bug made its way

[Bug testsuite/119862] New: gcc.dg/pr119160.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119862 Bug ID: 119862 Summary: gcc.dg/pr119160.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assi

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Another example: ``` struct A { template const A& f(T); const A& g(int); template const A& h(); }; struct B : public A { using A::f; using A::g; using A::h; template const int f(T); co

[Bug testsuite/119862] gcc.dg/pr119160.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119862 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > GCC trunk seemly only rejects the template member function as being > ambigious though. Yes, because https://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#11 says "The set of

[Bug c++/119859] [15 Regression] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Another example: ... > template > const A& h(); ... > b.h(); T cannot be deduced in this call, so A::h is not a viable candidate, so it's not ambiguous.

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug testsuite/119818] FAIL: cobol.dg/group2/FUNCTION_DATE___TIME_OMNIBUS.cob -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119818 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed8761241ac529ccddb2b76a1895c124c67c132c commit r16-30-ged8761241ac529ccddb2b76a1895c124c67c132c Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug libfortran/119502] Runtime segfault when closing invalid unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119502 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Building with Steve's latest patch now. If all passes here I will commit to 16 and request to backport to 15. Thanks Steve.

[Bug c++/119863] New: [modules] Bogus conflicting friend template declaration

-linux-gnu Configurado con: ../gcc-15.1.0-RC-20250418/configure --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/home/pililatiesa/gcc-15/ Modelo de hilos: posix Algoritmos de compresión LTO admitidos: zlib zstd gcc versión 15.0.1 20250418 (prerelease) (GCC)

[Bug target/119865] New: [15/16 regression] RISC-V: ICE in g++.target/riscv/mv(c)-symbols[1-5].C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865 Bug ID: 119865 Summary: [15/16 regression] RISC-V: ICE in g++.target/riscv/mv(c)-symbols[1-5].C Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/119867] New: Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 Bug ID: 119867 Summary: Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 Yichao Yu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|88443 | Component|tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 61157 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61157&action=edit Patch to fix issue Here are Changelog entries for fortran/ and testsuite/. 2025-04-18 Steven G.

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||88443 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be another dup of this bug too ...

[Bug libstdc++/119840] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/108016] RISC-V：Bad codegen in scalar code comparing to LLVM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108016 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:529a43109fcd93f5aafda345da14679f538ada86 commit r16-17-g529a43109fcd93f5aafda345da14679f538ada86 Author: Alexey Merzlyakov Date: Fri

[Bug tree-optimization/119351] [14 Regression] Incorrect forall masking for AND reduction in early break

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351 Bug 119351 depends on bug 119858, which changed state. Bug 119858 Summary: [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 What|Remove

[Bug tree-optimization/119858] [15/16 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: Fix incorrect codegen with PFA and VLS [PR119351]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119858 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/119860] New: needless vector unrolling causes less profitable vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119860 Bug ID: 119860 Summary: needless vector unrolling causes less profitable vectorization Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optim

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yichao Yu from comment #5) > Yeah adding explicit bounds check do work but I still don't think the > compiler should be warning about this type of possible out-of-bound access. The problem is

[Bug middle-end/80328] With -ffloat-store std::array operator[] no longer cost-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #5 from Yichao Yu --- Yeah adding explicit bounds check do work but I still don't think the compiler should be warning about this type of possible out-of-bound access. FWIW, this code originate from a bigger project where the bounds

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yichao Yu from comment #1) > As a meta bug, should the ''result_decl' not supported by > dump_expr' in the error message be reported anywhere? Both > the fact that it couldn't print and that it

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #6 from Yichao Yu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Yichao Yu from comment #1) > > As a meta bug, should the ''result_decl' not supported by > > dump_expr' in the error message be reported anywhere? Both

[Bug tree-optimization/119868] New: `'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr` is printed instead of ` res` in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119868 Bug ID: 119868 Summary: `'result_decl' not supported by dump_expr` is printed instead of ` res` in some cases Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Ke

[Bug tree-optimization/119867] Spurious warning about out-of-bound write with -O3 and -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119867 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Yichao Yu from comment #1) > > As a meta bug, should the ''result_decl' not supported by > > dump_expr' in the error message be reported anywhere? B

[Bug c++/119859] New: [15 Regression?] template member function overload with base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119859 Bug ID: 119859 Summary: [15 Regression?] template member function overload with base class Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/119864] New: [modules] ICE -fmodules and omp reduction of UDT

ión de segmento 8 | T s = sum(v, 3u); | ^~~ 0x22373d6 internal_error(char const*, ...) ../../gcc-15.1.0-RC-20250418/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517 0xf8a223 crash_signal ../../gcc-15.1.0-RC-20250418/gcc/toplev.cc:322 0x77463624532f ??? ./signal/../sy

[Bug tree-optimization/83022] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] malloc & memset -> calloc is not always an optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61156 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61156&action=edit Full patch which I will be submitting once testing is finished It does not do the probability but does handle

[Bug fortran/119836] [15/16 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9ea46d946887a05d7ecbca5aeeb99fd868f6e70 commit r16-32-gf9ea46d946887a05d7ecbca5aeeb99fd868f6e70 Author: Steven G. Kargl Date:

[Bug c++/119863] [15/16 Regression][modules] Bogus conflicting friend template declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/119863] [15/16 Regression][modules] Bogus conflicting friend template declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119863 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug driver/110522] `-fdiagnostics-format=sarif-file`: file name conflicts / races

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110522 --- Comment #6 from Roman Lebedev --- Somewhat relevant: i've looked into feeding such compiler SARIF's into already-existing Github SARIF upload tooling, and it almost works, consider upvoting: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/1571

[Bug tree-optimization/83022] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] malloc & memset -> calloc is not always an optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681439.html

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used (+=, ++)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 --- Comment #19 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18) > *** Bug 119544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The example in this bug was extern char* str; void foo(void) { int i = 0; while (*s

[Bug c/47781] warnings from custom printf format specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781 Luke Shumaker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lukeshu at lukeshu dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/119865] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: ICE in g++.target/riscv/mv(c)-symbols[1-5].C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 See Also|

[Bug target/119865] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: ICE in g++.target/riscv/mv(c)-symbols[1-5].C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119865 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from Sam J

[Bug rtl-optimization/119160] wrong code with -O2 -finstrument-functions-once -favoid-store-forwarding -fnon-call-exceptions -fschedule-insns -mgeneral-regs-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119160 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/119507] only the comdat functions before normal functions get their own gcc_except_table section (unless using -ffunction-sections)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119507 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- (I

[Bug target/119869] New: copysign(0, x) code could be better

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119869 Bug ID: 119869 Summary: copysign(0, x) code could be better Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/119291] [12/13/14 regression] wrong code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119291 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7381ea8fc4d6dc12af287c20caa3b2019b2f6567 commit r14-11653-g7381ea8fc4d6dc12af287c20caa3b2019b2f6567 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/119582] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:18708 with -fsanitize=pointer-subtract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119582 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0946fe4d216829e96bf2cd64faf5e4630dd8cc2 commit r14-11654-gc0946fe4d216829e96bf2cd64faf5e4630dd8cc2 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgcc/101075] libatomic's libat_lock_n can deadlock from inconsistent locking order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50bd360f9270e6656368a5bdf9426b4022780609 commit r14-11663-g50bd360f9270e6656368a5bdf9426b4022780609 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/119722] wrong code with _BitInt(), __builtin_stdc_rotate_left() at -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119722 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:056a01f9fa85c584ed97533e75b50160d5993613 commit r14-11658-g056a01f9fa85c584ed97533e75b50160d5993613 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/119808] wrong code with _BitInt() and -ftree-coalesce-vars -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40c50659569f9d50db9108a5a9847518a5bcec66 commit r14-11662-g40c50659569f9d50db9108a5a9847518a5bcec66 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/119707] wrong code with _BitInt() mask and shift at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119707 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:008ba21711a4aef3b6d6e7d3dbbe2f2265e29ff8 commit r14-11657-g008ba21711a4aef3b6d6e7d3dbbe2f2265e29ff8 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/119785] [12/13/14 Regression] UBSAN errors in machmode.h on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119785 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efb22612f98c79f38c9e9c7ace3bc681dbcecc03 commit r14-11661-gefb22612f98c79f38c9e9c7ace3bc681dbcecc03 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug lto/119625] lto1: fatal error: open failed: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119625 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:293a95b87c5676ff04c6511e900c3d127692d664 commit r14-11655-g293a95b87c5676ff04c6511e900c3d127692d664 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgcc/101075] libatomic's libat_lock_n can deadlock from inconsistent locking order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d490c5884bf0e5b8d8752969d2ee4dacea700be0 commit r14-11664-gd490c5884bf0e5b8d8752969d2ee4dacea700be0 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug driver/119727] -freport-bug vs. ASLR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119727 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:438c4df22217280df3f141bd0b1df0523b4de6d3 commit r14-11660-g438c4df22217280df3f141bd0b1df0523b4de6d3 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug driver/119727] -freport-bug vs. ASLR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119727 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2aa812386ad5950283f800257c37bdb78691e770 commit r14-11659-g2aa812386ad5950283f800257c37bdb78691e770 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libgcc/119796] Atomic Operations Can Deadlock Without Hardware Support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50bd360f9270e6656368a5bdf9426b4022780609 commit r14-11663-g50bd360f9270e6656368a5bdf9426b4022780609 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/119870] New: `(vector8 unsigned) {0,0x80000000}` and `-0.0` constant formation could be better

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119870 Bug ID: 119870 Summary: `(vector8 unsigned) {0,0x8000}` and `-0.0` constant formation could be better Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug libgcc/119796] Atomic Operations Can Deadlock Without Hardware Support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d490c5884bf0e5b8d8752969d2ee4dacea700be0 commit r14-11664-gd490c5884bf0e5b8d8752969d2ee4dacea700be0 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/119871] New: Function parameters should never be name-independent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119871 Bug ID: 119871 Summary: Function parameters should never be name-independent Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 commit r16-22-g94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/87901] partial DSE of memset doesn't work for other kind of stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87901 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:800b3977031dd4f14d09ced975276e09457dfff7 commit r16-25-g800b3977031dd4f14d09ced975276e09457dfff7 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon A

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b4849ec79873fa6de98436deda47e19cbac32ef commit r16-23-g7b4849ec79873fa6de98436deda47e19cbac32ef Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon

[Bug tree-optimization/87901] partial DSE of memset doesn't work for other kind of stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87901 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d693c1ffd849e0c1df9cc6610a69a63ffcb2956 commit r16-26-g2d693c1ffd849e0c1df9cc6610a69a63ffcb2956 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon A

[Bug tree-optimization/36602] memset should be optimized into an empty CONSTRUCTOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36602 Bug 36602 depends on bug 87901, which changed state. Bug 87901 Summary: partial DSE of memset doesn't work for other kind of stores https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87901 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/118947] Missed optimization: GCC forgets stack buffer contents across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118947 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87901] partial DSE of memset doesn't work for other kind of stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/78408] C loop initial declarations generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78408 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 commit r16-22-g94f275432f7ea4781ec7c05fa9d1d81ef6cb3fc1 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/118902] missing predicated VN due to Canonical order of comparison with invariant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118902 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16082bdc6beef1ca1485ed5ccdc0c52aabbe0f4c commit r16-24-g16082bdc6beef1ca1485ed5ccdc0c52aabbe0f4c Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/118902] missing predicated VN due to Canonical order of comparison with invariant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118902 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/119866] New: constant evaluation failure with trivial function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 Bug ID: 119866 Summary: constant evaluation failure with trivial function Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/119866] constant evaluation failure with trivial function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I am not sure if __builtin_strlen is supposed to be callable from constexpr at all.

[Bug c++/119866] constant evaluation failure with trivial function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Though __builtin_strlen might not be the issue here...

[Bug c++/119866] constant evaluation failure with trivial function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin --- Well even gcc 4.7.1 accepted this int main() { static_assert(__builtin_strlen("hi") == 2, "!"); } At this point lots of code relies on that working.

[Bug c++/119866] constexpr with __builtin_strlen does not always work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61155 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61155&action=edit Reduced testcase without templates

[Bug c++/119866] constexpr with __builtin_strlen does not always work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- And yes it is due to __builtin_strlen in some cases.

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 119866, which changed state. Bug 119866 Summary: constexpr with __builtin_strlen does not always work https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/106889] __builtin_strlen fails for some constexpr constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106889 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/119866] constexpr with __builtin_strlen does not always work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/119866] constexpr with __builtin_strlen does not always work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119866 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Dup. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 106889 *** I should say bug 106889 is exactly the same as this one and yes it is __builtin_strlen a

[Bug fortran/119856] Missing commas in I/O formats not diagnosed by default at compile time.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119856 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Depends on|