[Bug tree-optimization/119351] [15 Regression] Wrong code in GROMACS for AArch64 generic SVE VLS target since r15-6807-g68326d5d1a593d

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351 --- Comment #20 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46ccce1de686c1b437eff43431dc20d20d4687c0 commit r15-9518-g46ccce1de686c1b437eff43431dc20d20d4687c0 Author: Tamar Christina Date

[Bug testsuite/119286] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: delay checking for alignment to load [PR118464]"

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa99720e9f3447565d274baaa81e23c2ddab4a67 commit r15-9519-gfa99720e9f3447565d274baaa81e23c2ddab4a67 Author: Tamar Christina Date:

[Bug testsuite/119286] [15 Regression] GCN vs. "middle-end: delay checking for alignment to load [PR118464]"

2025-04-16 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #46 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 61133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61133&action=edit updated patch The problem in previous patch was that ipa-prop streams 0 to the end of block of summary section

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #47 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 61134 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61134&action=edit patch w/o forgotten debug output

[Bug c++/119829] Internal Compiler Error with braced initialization and designated initializers

2025-04-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119829 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug libstdc++/109162] C++23 improvements to std::format

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef87975224b0a4b5b103f241fd366b0e3a21360 commit r15-9520-gaef87975224b0a4b5b103f241fd366b0e3a21360 Author: Tomasz KamiÅski Date

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, if even that is too large, guess just grep -C50 'clrmem_short' hb-subset.cc.*[0-9]r.* might be good enough.

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.)

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #52 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61137 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61137&action=edit q.ii.xz This is a lot smaller but still pretty gross. Not reducing it further, but including in case it's of some

[Bug rust/119508] Hundreds of rust tests XPASS

2025-04-16 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org See Als

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug target/119386] [14 Regression] [x64] Shared libraries can no longer be compiled with profiling

2025-04-16 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14/15 Regression][x64] |[14 Regression] [x64] |Sh

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- I get one test failure: FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_all_clauses.f90 -O (test for errors, line 21) from: ! { dg-do compile } program do_concurrent_all_clauses implicit none integer :: i, arr(10

[Bug target/119832] RISC-V: Redundant floating point rounding mode store/restore

2025-04-16 Thread pan2.li at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832 --- Comment #4 from Li Pan --- (In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #1) > Created attachment 61135 [details] > 0001-RISC-V-Implement-TARGET_MODE_CONFLUENCE.patch > > My working patch for this bug I think TARGET_MODE_CONFLUENCE should be a bett

[Bug libstdc++/119840] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb73.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

2025-04-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- I'm also seeing warnings from this file in build log. Probably, this warning was introduced in the following commit: 473dde525248a694c0f4e62b31a7fc24b238c5b0

[Bug libstdc++/119742] [C++26] Implement P2697R1, Interfacing bitset with string_view

2025-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119742 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67224] UTF-8 support for identifier names in GCC

2025-04-16 Thread neilb at protonmail dot ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224 Neil Booth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neilb at protonmail dot ch --- Comment #38

[Bug tree-optimization/97640] GCC doesn't optimize-out outside-affecting lambdas within y-combinator while clang does.

2025-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97640 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/119234] openblas miscompiled with -mcpu=power8

2025-04-16 Thread jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119234 Jeevitha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/110343] [C++26] P2558R2 - Add @, $, and ` to the basic character set

2025-04-16 Thread aaron at aaronballman dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343 Aaron Ballman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron at aaronballman dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/110343] [C++26] P2558R2 - Add @, $, and ` to the basic character set

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- N3220 does have those 3 in there too, but dunno if that is a post C23 or pre C23 draft.

[Bug middle-end/119831] Missed pointer compare folding

2025-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119831 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/110343] [C++26] P2558R2 - Add @, $, and ` to the basic character set

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- I was looking at N3096 and that one doesn't have that. I see it in N3467. Does official C23 have that change? Or is it C2Y?

[Bug target/117010] [nvptx] Incorrect ptx code-gen for C++ code with templates

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2025-03-25 00:00:00 |2025-4-16 Resolution|---

[Bug target/118518] gcc 14.2.1 nvptx cross compiler complains about alias definitions in a struct with two constructors that are not aliases

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518 Bug 118518 depends on bug 117010, which changed state. Bug 117010 Summary: [nvptx] Incorrect ptx code-gen for C++ code with templates https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/97106] [nvptx] Issues with weak aliases introduced by C++

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/110343] [C++26] P2558R2 - Add @, $, and ` to the basic character set

2025-04-16 Thread aaron at aaronballman dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343 --- Comment #17 from Aaron Ballman --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > N3220 does have those 3 in there too, but dunno if that is a post C23 or pre > C23 draft. https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3124.pdf was adopt

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #53 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eabba7be040e81690332070873d59d23e8c93e11 commit r15-9522-geabba7be040e81690332070873d59d23e8c93e11 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Wed

[Bug middle-end/119808] wrong code with _BitInt() and -ftree-coalesce-vars -fstack-protector-strong

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 --- Comment #41 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #38) > The testcase from comment 14 fails for me still with Martin's last patch as > well as Honza's. Though it works with the https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug target/115258] [14 Regression] register swaps for vector perm in some cases after r14-6290

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94ef80629a5f808ff165d28f87f39021881ed5f4 commit r14-11638-g94ef80629a5f808ff165d28f87f39021881ed5f4 Author: Richard Sa

[Bug target/118501] [14 regression] aarch64: ICE in simplify_context::simplify_subreg

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14fe427ab5eec008e12e7aa275caf046c0588c68 commit r14-11634-g14fe427ab5eec008e12e7aa275caf046c0588c68 Author: Richard S

[Bug target/119133] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in mark_label_nuses (emit-rtl.cc:3896) with -O -fno-tree-ter and _Float16 since r14-1131

2025-04-16 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119133 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #9 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > (In reply to lfoldy from comment #7) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > > Created attachment 61136 [details] > > > gcc15-pr119834.patch

[Bug target/118501] [14 regression] aarch64: ICE in simplify_context::simplify_subreg

2025-04-16 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/115258] [14 Regression] register swaps for vector perm in some cases after r14-6290

2025-04-16 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/119399] [12/13/14 Backport] Overlap check in vectorized code may invoke UB

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b079728cf34d050a1e7eec6e2a50cf8ce10b15cc commit r14-11632-gb079728cf34d050a1e7eec6e2a50cf8ce10b15cc Author: Richard Sa

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Use xz -9e to compress it afterwards. And remove the vartrack one, there is nothing interesting in there for this PR.

[Bug tree-optimization/116125] [12/13/14 Regression] Does not fully checking for overlapping memory regions with the vectorizer

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a4b0a1d02e992a64db39a2b8d5b69ad5db58eeb commit r14-11636-g2a4b0a1d02e992a64db39a2b8d5b69ad5db58eeb Author: Richard S

[Bug target/97106] [nvptx] Issues with weak aliases introduced by C++

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge --- *** Bug 106445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/106445] nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting lost

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119827] Out of bounds check fails on substrings for upper bound

2025-04-16 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827 --- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Visagan Ravindran from comment #2) > (In reply to kargls from comment #1) > > Perhaps, a review of the Fortran standard is in order. > > > >F2023, 9.4.1 > > > >R910 substrin

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, I'm afraid my bootstrap/regtest will take until tomorrow, https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1218/131601218/build.log it is only make -j3 (and eventhough I've disabled LTO bootstrap, it wi

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #18 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61139&action=edit dump part2

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #19 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61140 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61140&action=edit dump part3

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source? So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be a P1) or not?

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #17 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61138&action=edit dump part1

[Bug c++/116954] [13/14/15 Regression] format attribute is being lost for function template with a depedent type argument and decl merging since r13-4160-g2efb237ffc68ec

2025-04-16 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/119572] [15 Regression] Recent change triggers regression on RISC-V vector test since r15-9062

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52c1f60bea3f2ec589a694c3a0bf4f1c4666fa5b commit r14-11639-g52c1f60bea3f2ec589a694c3a0bf4f1c4666fa5b Author: Robin Dapp Date:

[Bug target/119830] RISC-V:Internal Compiler Error on RISC-V Windows Toolchain (32-bit program) with -march=rv64gc_zbb_zbs

2025-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119830 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-16 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/106948] pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e3060ee17e6eb8bab718d320199f713533dbbd6 commit r15-9528-g4e3060ee17e6eb8bab718d320199f713533dbbd6 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug middle-end/119833] Clarify which semantics offloading compilation does (not) inherit from using the LTO infrastructure

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119833 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/119836] New: [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 Bug ID: 119836 Summary: [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-16 Thread rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759 Robert Dubner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/106948] pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy

2025-04-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/119485] OpenACC offloading compilation failure/ICE for C++ templated library functions

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119485 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- I suspect that we'll need for OpenACC something like 'gcc/omp-offload.cc:omp_discover_implicit_declare_target', and commit r11-3505-g2a10a2c0689db280ee3a94164504b7196b8370f4 "OpenMP: Handle cpp_implicit_al

[Bug target/119832] RISC-V: Redundant floating point rounding mode store/restore

2025-04-16 Thread rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832 Robin Dapp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/96088] Range insertion into unordered_map is less effective than a loop with insertion

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- tl;dr: > The remaining regressions in the number of allocations and temporaries > should be addressed separately, with more conservative optimizations > specific to std::string. That is not pa

[Bug libgcc/101075] libatomic's libat_lock_n can deadlock from inconsistent locking order

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329 commit r15-9525-g61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug libgcc/119796] Atomic Operations Can Deadlock Without Hardware Support

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329 commit r15-9525-g61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug libgcc/119796] Atomic Operations Can Deadlock Without Hardware Support

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497 commit r15-9526-g34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libgcc/101075] libatomic's libat_lock_n can deadlock from inconsistent locking order

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497 commit r15-9526-g34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/114772] [12/13/14/15 Regression] pragma GCC target applied to earlier template function with __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

2025-04-16 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|12.5 Status|NEW

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks, confirmed it is late_combine that changes (insn 1817 227 1735 42 (set (reg:DI 2 %r2 [orig:250 _176 ] [250]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) "../src/hb-algs.hh":996:17 1811 {*movdi_64} (nil)) (note

[Bug tree-optimization/119835] New: GCN, nvptx offloading: '

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119835 Bug ID: 119835 Summary: GCN, nvptx offloading: ' Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/106445] nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting lost

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b2a2490bebd29acc4da18562eec7464601cbb05 commit r15-9524-g0b2a2490bebd29acc4da18562eec7464601cbb05 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug target/100638] FP16 (vector) compare missed optimization on AArch64

2025-04-16 Thread Spencer.Abson at arm dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100638 Spencer Abson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Spencer.Abson at arm dot com --- Commen

[Bug lto/63215] LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted from object files

2025-04-16 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x since r15-1579

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/119614] [15 regression] protobuf-29.4 fails to build with -O2 (error: cannot tail-call: call and return value are different)

2025-04-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97106] [nvptx] Issues with weak aliases introduced by C++

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca9cffe737d20953082333dacebb65d4261e0d0c commit r15-9523-gca9cffe737d20953082333dacebb65d4261e0d0c Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #14 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #12) > Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? > (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.) [alma8 build]$ fl_gcc -v

[Bug c++/102012] GCC accepts any non-bool atomic constraint type

2025-04-16 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102012 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/106447] nvptx offloading: C++ '__iterator_category' 'return' ICE

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118518] gcc 14.2.1 nvptx cross compiler complains about alias definitions in a struct with two constructors that are not aliases

2025-04-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518 Bug 118518 depends on bug 106445, which changed state. Bug 106445 Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting lost https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/119832] RISC-V: Redundant floating point rounding mode store/restore

2025-04-16 Thread pan2.li at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832 --- Comment #2 from Li Pan --- More details. 7 --- mode change from 10 -> 7 // NONE => DYN <<< 8 --- restore mode is dyn and prev is not call 9 --- mode change from 7 -> 9 // DYN => CALL 10 --- mode change from 10 -> 9 // NONE =>

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #20 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Created attachment 61141 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61141&action=edit preprocessed

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #22 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- I started a bootstrap+regtest, too, for targets z900,z10,z13,z16. Each run will take around 5 hours. I will report back once they finished or if some fail on the go. I have attached a prep

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

2025-04-16 Thread lfoldy at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #21 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source? > So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be > a

[Bug c++/110343] [C++26] P2558R2 - Add @, $, and ` to the basic character set

2025-04-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 61142 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61142&action=edit gcc15-pr110343-c.patch So far lightly tested patch for allowing those in C23/C2Y.

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net --- Well, that's weird. It appears that I'm the guilty person. 'git blame resolve.cc' leads to 7d92901c878c commit 7d92901c878c6c00ada7f9cee8825f03ad4722f1 Author: Steve Kargl Date: Sun Nov 24 18

[Bug fortran/119836] [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT

2025-04-16 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836 --- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net --- All intrinsic functions are simple, and therefore pure. The following patch should fix the issue with functions. A similar fix is needed for subroutine, but only a few intrinsic subroutine are p

[Bug c++/106212] Code becomes non-constexpr with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0d805192b0092235b2ef32a184b17a76ebac401 commit r12-11044-gc0d805192b0092235b2ef32a184b17a76ebac401 Author: Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/116549] std::disable_sized_sentinel_for is missing specialisation for std::move_iterator

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|12.5 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug libstdc++/117560] std::views::zip incompatible with std::filesystem::directory_iterator & std::views::transform

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117560 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f3811fd50113571127b849325ab8f6c674158af commit r12-11040-g5f3811fd50113571127b849325ab8f6c674158af Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/117560] std::views::zip incompatible with std::filesystem::directory_iterator & std::views::transform

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|12.5 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c++/117966] [12/13/14/15 regression] constexpr std::span construction fails to compile with D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117966 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely --- The error in std::span is fixed for 12.5, 13.4 and 14.3

[Bug c++/119838] optional template keyword with global namespace causing error

2025-04-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119838 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-16 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug libstdc++/113841] Can't swap two std::hash

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113841 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- The std::vector problem is fixed for 12.5 and 13.3 and 14.1

[Bug tree-optimization/116922] [12 Regression] ICE: in op_iter_init, at ssa-iterators.h:604 with -Ofast

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116922 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5929ef809558a3117e7a6e2e66316a828b50f29 commit r12-11048-ga5929ef809558a3117e7a6e2e66316a828b50f29 Author: Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/116749] [12/13/14/15 Regression] program crash under -O3 optimization since r12-5300-gf98f373dd822b3

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3 commit r12-11047-g5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3 Author: Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/106212] Code becomes non-constexpr with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2025-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- The std::array problem is fixed for 12.5, 13.4 and 14.3

[Bug tree-optimization/111285] [12 Regression] vector ABSU is lowered incorrectly

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df76d7b05693dc511a114cb6ece2cbc5eef25dea commit r12-11049-gdf76d7b05693dc511a114cb6ece2cbc5eef25dea Author: Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/117243] [12 regression] program crash under -O3 optimization or higher since r12-5300-gf98f373dd822b3

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117243 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3 commit r12-11047-g5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3 Author: Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/118922] [12 regression] Miscompile at -O2/3

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118922 --- Comment #29 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d0c2f769553c65a39c12df3c2d0891c53fafd6a commit r12-11050-g9d0c2f769553c65a39c12df3c2d0891c53fafd6a Author: Andrew Pinski

  1   2   3   >