https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46ccce1de686c1b437eff43431dc20d20d4687c0
commit r15-9518-g46ccce1de686c1b437eff43431dc20d20d4687c0
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa99720e9f3447565d274baaa81e23c2ddab4a67
commit r15-9519-gfa99720e9f3447565d274baaa81e23c2ddab4a67
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #46 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61133
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61133&action=edit
updated patch
The problem in previous patch was that ipa-prop streams 0 to the end of block
of summary section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #47 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 61134
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61134&action=edit
patch w/o forgotten debug output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119829
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aef87975224b0a4b5b103f241fd366b0e3a21360
commit r15-9520-gaef87975224b0a4b5b103f241fd366b0e3a21360
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, if even that is too large, guess just
grep -C50 'clrmem_short' hb-subset.cc.*[0-9]r.*
might be good enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? (Wondering
what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #52 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61137
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61137&action=edit
q.ii.xz
This is a lot smaller but still pretty gross. Not reducing it further, but
including in case it's of some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression][x64] |[14 Regression] [x64]
|Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I get one test failure:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_all_clauses.f90 -O (test for errors, line
21)
from:
! { dg-do compile }
program do_concurrent_all_clauses
implicit none
integer :: i, arr(10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
--- Comment #4 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #1)
> Created attachment 61135 [details]
> 0001-RISC-V-Implement-TARGET_MODE_CONFLUENCE.patch
>
> My working patch for this bug
I think TARGET_MODE_CONFLUENCE should be a bett
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119840
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
I'm also seeing warnings from this file in build log.
Probably, this warning was introduced in the following commit:
473dde525248a694c0f4e62b31a7fc24b238c5b0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224
Neil Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neilb at protonmail dot ch
--- Comment #38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97640
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119234
Jeevitha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeevitha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
Aaron Ballman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaron at aaronballman dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
N3220 does have those 3 in there too, but dunno if that is a post C23 or pre
C23 draft.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I was looking at N3096 and that one doesn't have that. I see it in N3467.
Does official C23 have that change? Or is it C2Y?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2025-03-25 00:00:00 |2025-4-16
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518
Bug 118518 depends on bug 117010, which changed state.
Bug 117010 Summary: [nvptx] Incorrect ptx code-gen for C++ code with templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
--- Comment #17 from Aaron Ballman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> N3220 does have those 3 in there too, but dunno if that is a post C23 or pre
> C23 draft.
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3124.pdf was adopt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #53 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eabba7be040e81690332070873d59d23e8c93e11
commit r15-9522-geabba7be040e81690332070873d59d23e8c93e11
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
--- Comment #41 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #38)
> The testcase from comment 14 fails for me still with Martin's last patch as
> well as Honza's.
Though it works with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94ef80629a5f808ff165d28f87f39021881ed5f4
commit r14-11638-g94ef80629a5f808ff165d28f87f39021881ed5f4
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14fe427ab5eec008e12e7aa275caf046c0588c68
commit r14-11634-g14fe427ab5eec008e12e7aa275caf046c0588c68
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119133
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #9 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> (In reply to lfoldy from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > > Created attachment 61136 [details]
> > > gcc15-pr119834.patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118501
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119399
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b079728cf34d050a1e7eec6e2a50cf8ce10b15cc
commit r14-11632-gb079728cf34d050a1e7eec6e2a50cf8ce10b15cc
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Use xz -9e to compress it afterwards. And remove the vartrack one, there is
nothing interesting in there for this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116125
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a4b0a1d02e992a64db39a2b8d5b69ad5db58eeb
commit r14-11636-g2a4b0a1d02e992a64db39a2b8d5b69ad5db58eeb
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
*** Bug 106445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
--- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Visagan Ravindran from comment #2)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> > Perhaps, a review of the Fortran standard is in order.
> >
> >F2023, 9.4.1
> >
> >R910 substrin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, I'm afraid my bootstrap/regtest will take until tomorrow,
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1218/131601218/build.log it is
only make -j3 (and eventhough I've disabled LTO bootstrap, it wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #18 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 61139
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61139&action=edit
dump part2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #19 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 61140
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61140&action=edit
dump part3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source?
So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be a
P1) or not?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #17 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 61138
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61138&action=edit
dump part1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116954
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119572
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52c1f60bea3f2ec589a694c3a0bf4f1c4666fa5b
commit r14-11639-g52c1f60bea3f2ec589a694c3a0bf4f1c4666fa5b
Author: Robin Dapp
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119830
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-16
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e3060ee17e6eb8bab718d320199f713533dbbd6
commit r15-9528-g4e3060ee17e6eb8bab718d320199f713533dbbd6
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119833
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
Bug ID: 119836
Summary: [15 Regression] Elemental intrinsic treated as IMPURE
within BLOCK within DO CONCURRENT
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119485
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I suspect that we'll need for OpenACC something like
'gcc/omp-offload.cc:omp_discover_implicit_declare_target', and commit
r11-3505-g2a10a2c0689db280ee3a94164504b7196b8370f4 "OpenMP: Handle
cpp_implicit_al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
tl;dr:
> The remaining regressions in the number of allocations and temporaries
> should be addressed separately, with more conservative optimizations
> specific to std::string. That is not pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329
commit r15-9525-g61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329
commit r15-9525-g61dfb0747afcece3b7a690807b83b366ff34f329
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119796
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497
commit r15-9526-g34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101075
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497
commit r15-9526-g34fe8e90007afbc87941df9b01ffcf8747c11497
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114772
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|12.5
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks, confirmed it is late_combine that changes
(insn 1817 227 1735 42 (set (reg:DI 2 %r2 [orig:250 _176 ] [250])
(const_int 4 [0x4])) "../src/hb-algs.hh":996:17 1811 {*movdi_64}
(nil))
(note
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119835
Bug ID: 119835
Summary: GCN, nvptx offloading: '
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b2a2490bebd29acc4da18562eec7464601cbb05
commit r15-9524-g0b2a2490bebd29acc4da18562eec7464601cbb05
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100638
Spencer Abson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Spencer.Abson at arm dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119614
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca9cffe737d20953082333dacebb65d4261e0d0c
commit r15-9523-gca9cffe737d20953082333dacebb65d4261e0d0c
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #14 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`?
> (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.)
[alma8 build]$ fl_gcc -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102012
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106447
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518
Bug 118518 depends on bug 106445, which changed state.
Bug 106445 Summary: nvptx offloading: C++ constructor symbol alias getting lost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106445
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119832
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan ---
More details.
7 --- mode change from 10 -> 7 // NONE => DYN <<<
8 --- restore mode is dyn and prev is not call
9 --- mode change from 7 -> 9 // DYN => CALL
10 --- mode change from 10 -> 9 // NONE =>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #20 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Created attachment 61141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61141&action=edit
preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #22 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I started a bootstrap+regtest, too, for targets z900,z10,z13,z16. Each run
will take around 5 hours. I will report back once they finished or if some
fail on the go.
I have attached a prep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #21 from lfoldy at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source?
> So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61142
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61142&action=edit
gcc15-pr110343-c.patch
So far lightly tested patch for allowing those in C23/C2Y.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
--- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
Well, that's weird. It appears that I'm the guilty person.
'git blame resolve.cc' leads to 7d92901c878c
commit 7d92901c878c6c00ada7f9cee8825f03ad4722f1
Author: Steve Kargl
Date: Sun Nov 24 18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119836
--- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
All intrinsic functions are simple, and therefore pure. The following
patch should fix the issue with functions. A similar fix is needed for
subroutine, but only a few intrinsic subroutine are p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0d805192b0092235b2ef32a184b17a76ebac401
commit r12-11044-gc0d805192b0092235b2ef32a184b17a76ebac401
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116549
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|12.5
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117560
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f3811fd50113571127b849325ab8f6c674158af
commit r12-11040-g5f3811fd50113571127b849325ab8f6c674158af
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117560
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|12.5
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117966
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The error in std::span is fixed for 12.5, 13.4 and 14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119838
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-16
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113841
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The std::vector problem is fixed for 12.5 and 13.3 and 14.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116922
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5929ef809558a3117e7a6e2e66316a828b50f29
commit r12-11048-ga5929ef809558a3117e7a6e2e66316a828b50f29
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116749
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3
commit r12-11047-g5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106212
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The std::array problem is fixed for 12.5, 13.4 and 14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df76d7b05693dc511a114cb6ece2cbc5eef25dea
commit r12-11049-gdf76d7b05693dc511a114cb6ece2cbc5eef25dea
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117243
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3
commit r12-11047-g5347b382a38d664216bd7484dd5438a1863d02a3
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118922
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d0c2f769553c65a39c12df3c2d0891c53fafd6a
commit r12-11050-g9d0c2f769553c65a39c12df3c2d0891c53fafd6a
Author: Andrew Pinski
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo