https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119371
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a13dc48a3ac3282aaf9a77516b4f02faa60e393
commit r15-8297-g9a13dc48a3ac3282aaf9a77516b4f02faa60e393
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 119272, which changed state.
Bug 119272 Summary: Function misidentified as non-function in associate
statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Still have one to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
We can see this without constraints in this adjusted testcase:
template struct A { };
template
auto foo(unsigned n) -> A
{ return {}; }
int main() { foo(5); }
The regression for the original testcase happ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #9 from Arthur Cohen ---
This should now be fixed by our latest patch upload. If anyone would like to
try again and report back please do, and I'll close this out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119371
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Bisecting points at the following commit - but that seems to rather reveal the
issue and not causing it: r15-3135-gcb51e0b236c7d4
lto: Don't check obj.found for offload section
obj.found is the num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Bug ID: 119372
Summary: Aarch64: Compiling with -march=armv8-a+pauth
-mbranch-protection=standard produces autiasp and
retaa in the function epilogue
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Andrew, any progress on bisecting the bootstrap failure?
In any case, looking at the patch:
+ if (call_save_p && latest_call_insn != NULL)
+/* PR116028: If original_regno is a pseudo that has been ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #6 from Pengcheng Wang ---
Ping.
I can't find the fix on master branch, what is the status now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
--- Comment #24 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi,
Yeah vectorization was one of the reasons for the slowdown.
Do note however it's not entirely safe to backport that patch, as it exposes
another bug which has a large fix.
At least the top two comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115842
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #6)
> > > I noticed some double-counting of cost in group-candidate (reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119358
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b32473d3e40d816e4ba280f8a58f44957219681
commit r15-8291-g3b32473d3e40d816e4ba280f8a58f44957219681
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The *power_of_ten stuff is purely integral, so in the PR119242 patch I've used
FIXED_WIDE_INT(128) type for it.
So it is just about the case when that needs to be converted to floating point,
and we have re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Bug ID: 119378
Summary: Nested template class friend of template class
produces "internal compiler error: unexpected
expression ‘T’ of kind template_parm_index"
Product: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2dcdbfa34fe0212b827344ee22f2c9039921f5c
commit r14-11423-ga2dcdbfa34fe0212b827344ee22f2c9039921f5c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 119316, which changed state.
Bug 119316 Summary: [14/15 Regression] new expression incorrectly required to
have constant expression size inside a requires constraint of a template
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #13 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60826
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60826&action=edit
Patch which seems to work
I have no way to test this patch for arm so it would be a good idea if someone
else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
I can regtest it for you (and check it fixes the testcases) at least.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
Bug ID: 119379
Summary: [15 regression] ICE on CTAD for alias template with
type constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-20
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119379
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 60827
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60827&action=edit
Semi reduced
The concept for the type alias does not need to be depedent.
เพราะธุรกิจรอไม่ได้
สินเชื่อสำหรับเจ้าของบริษัท เจ้าของกิจการ
✅สินเชื่อเจ้าของธุรกิจ
✅วงเงินกู้สูงสุด10 ล้านบาท
✅รู้ผลอนุมัติไวใน 30 นาที
✅ไม่ต้องมีคนค้ำ
✅ดอกเบี้ยต่ำ ตลอดสัญญา
...นี่ไม่ใช่ทางเลือก...แต่เป็นทางรอด👏👏
LINE : 0968582917
โทร : 096-858-2917 (คุณ.ไอซ์)
พร้อมยินดีให้บริการ.💸🙏
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
For the gcc 15 release we could just drop the clang:: support, so it becomes
opt-in? (have to use gnu::musttail)
g='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-lto'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.1 20250319 (experimental)
be671ec1f30ecd55aaff09048afb2a619018cb8a (Gentoo Hardened 15.0. p, commit
e36bfd9d8fde238e78a3ea7aacac14d2953f25ce)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Overall, I see:
```
+ === cobol tests ===
+
+Running cobol:/gcc/testsuite/cobol.dg/dg.exp ...
+FAIL: cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob -O0 (internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault)
+FAIL: cobo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119376
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
For completeness for searching etc: this shows up with Firefox when building
Skia too:
```
gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkRasterPipeline_opts.h:1603:31: error: cannot
tail-call: other reasons
```
amonakov gave:
```
v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119360
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80e1dac3849b134ebd5e0151e9c9e4b8b091de72
commit r15-8452-g80e1dac3849b134ebd5e0151e9c9e4b8b091de72
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3292ca9b0818c3e55102413c2407711d0755d280
commit r15-8453-g3292ca9b0818c3e55102413c2407711d0755d280
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380
Bug ID: 119380
Summary: [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with
allocatable and procedure pointer components
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
--- Comment #2 from Haochen Jiang ---
I have got the upcoming target in thread test fail:
...failed updating 18 targets...
testing.capture-output
../../../bin.v2/libs/thread/test/ex_executor.test/gcc-15/dbg/thrd-mlt/vsblt-hdn/ex_executor.run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #4 from Jeevitha ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Oh this is just a testsuite issue.
>
>
> `-fno-ipa-icf` is needed as now insert_di_0_v2 and insert_di_0 can figure
> out are the same function so insert_di_0_v2 bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
Bug ID: 119381
Summary: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern fails on
libnetfilter_conntrack-1.1.0 (sorry, unimplemented:
__builtin_clear_padding not supported for variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
int main() {
const int size = 4096;
union {
char buffer[size];
bool req;
} u;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(Why doesn't size get folded?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24b6d2014035073870d9d8dae9152fc16fc319fd
commit r15-8447-g24b6d2014035073870d9d8dae9152fc16fc319fd
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117811
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> I am going to at least regtest it for aarch64 and x86_64. and I did check we
> get the correct code now too.
I did a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu and th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Bug ID: 119383
Summary: [15 Regression] Boost 1.85 lib build fail after commit
r15-8011
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117452
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a6cafd7f55c6e88a9780b91039257572038535
commit r15-8461-g62a6cafd7f55c6e88a9780b91039257572038535
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
Bug ID: 119382
Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c fail starting with
r15-7961-gdc47161c1f32c3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see how that alias patch could cause this failure since the testcase
does not have any structs in it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-buil |[15 Regression]
|tin-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117452
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119382
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The reason is before:
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3978)[_2] = x_6(D);
and:
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3983)[_2] = x_6(D);
Could not figure out was doing the same access. Fixing the bug in
ao_compare::compare_ao_refs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103374
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119270
--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang ---
>From my run, it should have fixed the regression. Thx!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
So as I mentioned on IRC, clang implements a slightly different extension
compared to GCC. clang decides that size is a constant integer expression
handles it that way and gives a warning about it:
```
:5:22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119381
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> (Why doesn't size get folded?)
Because it is not a const integer expression in C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60806|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119368
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or if the problem is somehow specific to gcn (except for not having as
support), perhaps the backend could just disable variable location views or
something similar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The diff for a.xamdgcn-amdhsa.mkoffload.270r.expand shows identical output.
When glancing at the diff for a.xamdgcn-amdhsa.mkoffload.1.s, I noticed a large
increase in the 'local vars size':
- ; loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
mentioned on irc, #gcc:
https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/commit/1bd6cdbd8d2a6e0bfaaf5c8ef61ca453f09899cf
that works for me on x86_64-linux-gnu at least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119369
Bug ID: 119369
Summary: GCN: weak undefined symbols -> execution test FAIL,
'HSA_STATUS_ERROR_VARIABLE_UNDEFINED'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/dwarf2out.cc;
> h=a2acfd1d35654827492b69ec35b571accf2263a4;hb=HEAD#l12994
Namely, output_one_line_info_table:
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Quoted too few lines:
13001 dw2_asm_output_delta (2, line_label, prev_label,
13002 "from %s to %s", prev_label,
line_label);
which calls
dw2_asm_output_delta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119368
Bug ID: 119368
Summary: immintrin code running slower with gcc than clang
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119361
--- Comment #1 from Robin Dapp ---
The issue is due to:
_279 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_480, 64, 0>;
_330 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_480, 64, 64>;
_340 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_481, 64, 0>;
_350 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_481, 64, 64>;
Ideally they expand to simple sl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119365
Bug ID: 119365
Summary: -fprofile-correction not covered by test suite
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118068
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acdf8105a7fcead27bd4924bf8dc7f76c9273943
commit r15-8289-gacdf8105a7fcead27bd4924bf8dc7f76c9273943
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118765
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1636e85270d918a84d57bb521c22c42abf42a47c
commit r15-8287-g1636e85270d918a84d57bb521c22c42abf42a47c
Author: Martin Uecker
Date:
ble-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250319113901-r15-8284-gd0110185eb78f1-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.0.1 20250319 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] |[14 Regression]
|_mm2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
Bug ID: 119367
Summary: [15 Regression][gcn] libgomp.fortran/target1.f90 with
'-O2 -g': '.2byte .LM6-.LM5' – error: ... out of range
– since r15-8047-gadb14c7625178b
Produc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/dwarf2out.cc;h=a2acfd1d35654827492b69ec35b571accf2263a4;hb=HEAD#l12994
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118061
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9e834958e82219f836577da4ef8176aca2c7c9f
commit r15-8286-gd9e834958e82219f836577da4ef8176aca2c7c9f
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119364
Bug ID: 119364
Summary: building a cobol crocc compiler on i686-linux-gnu
targeting x86_64-linux-gnu fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
Bug ID: 119370
Summary: [15 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at
gimplify.cc:834 for omptest's xt-declare-target-ctors
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119371
Bug ID: 119371
Summary: [15 Regression][OpenMP] accel/nvptx-none/lto1: ICE in
in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4636
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I tried the memcpy solution with the following testcase:
v2sf
smaller (v64sf in)
{
v2sf out = RESIZE_VECTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28a5efd15695250003534abf91af3210e7a88921
commit r15-8294-g28a5efd15695250003534abf91af3210e7a88921
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-19
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119367
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or final.cc could arrange through length attributes if supported by the target
to emit artificial debug_hooks->source_line calls if the length since the last
source_line change is longer than say 16384 bytes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119372
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-19
Version|14.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119366
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119241
--- Comment #14 from Robert Dubner ---
"Wait for me! I am your leader!"
I am not *used* to this.
What I *am* used to is people telling me there's a problem in my code, and then
standing around tapping their feet impatiently until I fix it.
O
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
