https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116917
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] raised |[13/14 Regression] raised
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119355
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117088
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Did r15-6657-g405c99c17210a5 help bring back the performance?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116545
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116731
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9f88741a99ba09b29cc0021499c63ca445393f0
commit r14-11415-ga9f88741a99ba09b29cc0021499c63ca445393f0
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116706
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119357
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
[...]
> Or perhaps better just force it into REG:
Just force it into REG. Combine has more freedom this way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118104
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cf6e652bebc47c0e2cdb605172837595e14cdf8
commit r13-9435-g0cf6e652bebc47c0e2cdb605172837595e14cdf8
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119360
Bug ID: 119360
Summary: incomplete folding of initializers leads to dynamic
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fc1f70f0b7b50fd85aa58a0f29dd1e17f2113d1
commit r15-8280-g6fc1f70f0b7b50fd85aa58a0f29dd1e17f2113d1
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119355
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16065b6239aab2eecfd7a50f58d38324ee6478ba
commit r15-8281-g16065b6239aab2eecfd7a50f58d38324ee6478ba
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0910ebacff1ef3401ee578d947c91e348feb3465
commit r14-11417-g0910ebacff1ef3401ee578d947c91e348feb3465
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 119344, which changed state.
Bug 119344 Summary: [14/15 Regression] internal compiler error related to
template parameters and pointers to member functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119311
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> // Update the list of compiler-maintained enabled exceptions.
> extern "C"
> void
> __gg__stash_exceptions( size_t nec, cbl_enabled_exception_t *ecs )
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> More important than the missing self-assignment check and the missing copy
> constructor, there's no destructor.
>
> The missing check and copy ctor only ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119358
Bug ID: 119358
Summary: _M_rehash_insert of unordered sets/maps misses casting
of difference_type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119194
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49ccf5238b82f8bfc9d60c963710081f78fad6e9
commit r14-11418-g49ccf5238b82f8bfc9d60c963710081f78fad6e9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119194
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119316
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114169
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For my reduced testcase we get at optimized:
```
void func_1 ()
{
[local count: 1073741824]:
g_4 = g_2;
g_4.f0 = 0;
return;
}
void func_2 ()
{
[local count: 1073741824]:
g_4 = g_2;
g_4.f0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119352
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Stubbs ---
The libm vector routines are pretty much just the scalar routine translated
into vector extension statements wrapped in preprocessor macros.
They should be unaffected by the vectorizer (and most of the opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119356
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60805&action=edit
build.log.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119358
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #12)
> > BTW, I added some diagnostic to the 'if' clause showing:
> >
> > v64sf_fmod.c:147:109: warning: ‘__from’ (‘
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Oops, that has __to and __from backwards ... you get the idea.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
maybe
#define RESIZE_VECTOR(to_t, from) \
({ \
__auto_type __from = (from); \
to_t __to;
memcpy (&__to, &__from, MIN (sizeof (to_t), sizeof (from))); \
__to; \
})
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #12)
> BTW, I added some diagnostic to the 'if' clause showing:
>
> v64sf_fmod.c:147:109: warning: ‘__from’ (‘v2sf’ {aka ‘__vector(2) float’}):
> size = 8, align =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119307
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 119285, which changed state.
Bug 119285 Summary: [15 Regression] 5% slowdown of 519.lbm_r on Zen2 and Zen4
since r15-7932-ge355fe414aa3aa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119285
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119348
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119307
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ded45b72aaa43bbd8aa7c67f26a874cea8a18492
commit r15-8253-gded45b72aaa43bbd8aa7c67f26a874cea8a18492
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119286
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs ---
The RDNA consumer devices, such as gfx1100, support permute for V32 and
smaller, but not V64. Gather/scatter should be able to load from arbitrary
addresses, but synthesising a vector with those addresses ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119237
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
the transformation for GCOBOL_INSTALL_NAME is now fixed in trunk, I didn't
touch the cross case yet.
Is there a rationale, why GCOBOL_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME should be used, together
with that logic in the ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119312
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Indeed at IPA level we track if address of a symbol is taken, but we do not
keep any extra info about how it may be used. It would be useful to track
1) if address is used only to read (to figure out readon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
> Can you attach preprocessed source of the libm function?
BTW: The relevant newlib source files are (newlib/libm/machine/amdgcn/) the
following; looking at those is much more readable:
* amdgcn_veclib.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119354
Bug ID: 119354
Summary: ICE: error reporting routines re-entered. with
-mfunction-return=thunk -mindirect-branch=thunk-inline
-fcf-protection
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119312
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
And forgot to write. In case of strcmp I think we can use fnspec info we
already have at the time constructing callgraph to represent it as a read
rather than taking address. This would make things go bit sm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Summary|build failure:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> maybe
>
> #define RESIZE_VECTOR(to_t, from) \
> ({ \
>__auto_type __from = (from); \
>to_t __to;
>memcpy (&__to, &__from, MIN (sizeof (to_t), si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c2c0155385d8a9ed23bf5d754481e7f945b9702
commit r15-8252-g5c2c0155385d8a9ed23bf5d754481e7f945b9702
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:453d42046c461a8aa8ed68a88b94dac2d4dde73b
commit r15-8255-g453d42046c461a8aa8ed68a88b94dac2d4dde73b
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
Bug ID: 119351
Summary: [15 Regression] Wrong code in GROMACS for AArch64
generic SVE VLS target
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 60801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60801&action=edit
libm_a-v64sf_fmod.i - as requested in comment 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #3 from Pierre-Emmanuel Patry ---
This version of polonius is built with a nightly feature but we backported it
to stable in another commit. As we didn't want to send too many patches at once
we split the upstream process in four bat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Perhaps:
asm ("mov %0, %1" : "=v"(__from), "v"(__to));
or maybe
asm ("; no-op cast %0" : "=v"(__from), "0"(__to));
Is there a downside to that in the optimizer(s)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119357
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 60808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60808&action=edit
mask_test.ii.notrait.xz
Preprocessed source from -D_GLIBCXX_DO_NOT_USE_BUILTIN_TRAITS, sorry for
forgetting that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119312
--- Comment #14 from Joseph S. Myers ---
I think an object declared with a structure type with only const fields and no
padding can be considered const (no valid way to modify it), yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119237
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211
Bug 119211 depends on bug 119237, which changed state.
Bug 119237 Summary: building a cobol cross compiler fails to build the compiler
fully
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119237
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101533
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119012
--- Comment #21 from Levi Zim ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #18)
> (In reply to Levi Zim from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Sam James from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to Levi Zim from comment #15)
> > >
> > > As long as the flag is p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Bug ID: 119353
Summary: build failure: error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be
used on the stable release channel
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119355
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák ---
Created attachment 60804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60804&action=edit
config script
Uses binutils-avr32-linux-gnu package from Fedora for the binutils.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8744d53db1b6816586dac102942c00c105524172
commit r15-8251-g8744d53db1b6816586dac102942c00c105524172
Author: Tomasz KamiÅski
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114932
Tianyang Chou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tianyang.chou at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119355
Bug ID: 119355
Summary: ICE / assertion in "during RTL pass: avr-fuse-move"
for avr-linux cross-compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target|x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119270
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #2)
> Thank you for reporting this. I am working on analogous PR119285. I think
> the fix will be ready on this week.
Unfortunately, the patch for PR119285 di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119356
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-03-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119356
Bug ID: 119356
Summary: [15 regression] libsanitizer fails to build on riscv
musl
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119356
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120036 but that is for ppc musl.
That might be fix after all reading the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119344
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119356
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119347
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119345
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de ---
I ran rustup update stable.
$ rustc --version
rustc 1.85.0 (4d91de4e4 2025-02-17)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
What version of rustc? (rustc --version)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Arthur Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cohenarthur at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119353
Arthur Cohen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Confirmed, able to reproduce it now.
Taking a look. -march=armv8-a+sve is enough FFIW.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
BTW, I added some diagnostic to the 'if' clause showing:
v64sf_fmod.c:147:109: warning: ‘__from’ (‘v2sf’ {aka ‘__vector(2) float’}):
size = 8, align = 64
v64sf_fmod.c:147:198: warning: ‘__from’ (‘v2sf’ {ak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119187
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
>
> for (...)
>a[32*i] = ..;
>a[32*i+1] = ..;
> ...
>a[32*i + 31] = ...;
>
> to match the number of lanes in a HW vector. It shares some of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119325
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Can you attach preprocessed source of the libm function? The rev in question
had some followup fixes for other corner-cases, but given it only changes
+ /* When the access is fully outside of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119187
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> >
> > for (...)
> >a[32*i] = ..;
> >a[32*i+1] = ..;
> > ...
> >a[32*i + 31] = ...;
> >
> > to ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
I will take a look and try to reproduce/reduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119222
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Gwen Fu from comment #13)
>warning_at(loc, OPT_Wfloat_conversion,
> "conversion from %qT to %qT changes infinity to maximum or minimum integer
> value", expr_type , type) ;
The mess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118957
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91526
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The difference between GCC 12 and 13 is:
GCC 12:
```
;; = result;
(insn 12 11 13 (set (reg:TI 91)
(mem/c:TI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 77 virtual-stack-vars)
(const_int -32 [0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 119168, which changed state.
Bug 119168 Summary: [15 Regression] 5% 477.dealII slowdown since
r15-7605-gc5752c1f01316a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119168
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91526
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> here is an example where the C++ front-end produces IR which causes the
> opposite effect and the C front-end is better:
> struct Vec { float v[8]; };
>
> struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105848
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51b1c0a2dde8ada0856c8a8cf2c1d26ac1657787
commit r15-8259-g51b1c0a2dde8ada0856c8a8cf2c1d26ac1657787
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51b1c0a2dde8ada0856c8a8cf2c1d26ac1657787
commit r15-8259-g51b1c0a2dde8ada0856c8a8cf2c1d26ac1657787
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119314
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Priority|P3
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
